「godmode」の検索結果

Selects and composes the Godmode skills for a coding task, explains the activation boundary, keeps workflow skills from being skipped when they materially reduce risk, and identifies the task's current engineering lifecycle state. Use when starting a task with Godmode installed, deciding which skill to invoke, recovering a task after context loss, or checking whether a workflow applies. Not a replacement for the selected skill's instructions or for repository-local rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combines multi-agent brainstorming, the /grill-me slash command, and the 3 Core Godmodes (godmode-engineering, godmode-ui-ux, godmode-shipping) to force a comprehensive, multi-agent ideation and technical design workflow, ending in a plan-canvas review and a hand-off to /startcycle-graph. Use when the user asks to brainstorm, ideate, design, scope or sharpen a plan, idea or product, or when broad exploration before a build is the situation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jailbreak LLMs: Parseltongue, GODMODE, ULTRAPLINIAN.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jailbreak LLMs: Parseltongue, GODMODE, ULTRAPLINIAN.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jailbreak LLMs: Parseltongue, GODMODE, ULTRAPLINIAN.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BDB Engineering Godmode, enforcing strict Domain-Driven Design, TypeScript strictness, and Clean Architecture. Use when implementing backend/fullstack features or running the systematic 5-step debugging triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BDB Shipping Godmode, the final gatekeeper for production releases. Use when running pre-launch checks, feature-flag rollouts, or rollback planning under Spec-Driven Development before a release ships.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jailbreak LLMs: Parseltongue, GODMODE, ULTRAPLINIAN.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jailbreak API-served LLMs using G0DM0D3 techniques — Parseltongue input obfuscation (33 techniques), GODMODE CLASSIC system prompt templates, ULTRAPLINIAN multi-model racing, encoding escalation, and Hermes-native prefill/system prompt integration. Use when a user wants to bypass safety filters, jailbreak a model, or red-team model robustness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a GitHub pull request or focused branch diff for correctness, regressions, security, compatibility, test gaps, and maintainability. Use when an implementation needs an independent source-aware review before merge. Produces prioritized findings with evidence and actionable fixes. Not for architecture-only audits, formatting preferences, or processing existing review feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a focused code review request for a branch, commit, pull request, or substantial working-tree diff by defining the review boundary, contract, risk areas, evidence, and questions for an independent reviewer. Use before merge or when another agent needs to review an implementation. Not for processing feedback already received or for claiming runtime correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates or improves an Agent Skill by defining a precise trigger boundary, concise procedural instructions, progressive-disclosure references, deterministic helpers, routing evals, and validation evidence. Use when authoring or reviewing SKILL.md, skill metadata, bundled references, or skill packaging. Not for ordinary project documentation or application code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates and manages isolated Git worktrees for parallel agents, risky experiments, or long-running feature work while preserving the user's current checkout. Use before concurrent branch edits or when isolation makes rollback safer. Not for a trivial one-file change that is already isolated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits an existing rendered interface or frontend diff for hierarchy, content clarity, interaction states, accessibility, responsive behavior, visual consistency, performance-sensitive UI patterns, and anti-generic design defects. Use for a UI/UX review, redesign audit, screenshot review, pre-release visual check, or design-system consistency pass. Not for building a new interface from scratch or for backend-only review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes an existing implementation plan task by task, preserving its interfaces and constraints, running focused checks after each slice, and stopping when the repository differs from the plan. Use when a written plan or approved checklist already exists. Not for inventing the plan, debugging an unexplained failure, or broad unscoped cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and executes compatibility-preserving migrations across APIs, schemas, frameworks, dependencies, protocols, storage, and infrastructure with baselines, coexistence, staged cutover, rollback or forward-fix paths, and explicit removal criteria. Use for deprecations, upgrades, data moves, contract changes, and replacing live implementations. Not for a local refactor with no external state or compatibility boundary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explores ambiguous product or engineering intent before implementation, clarifies users, constraints, alternatives, risks, and acceptance criteria, and turns the result into an approved design direction. Use for a new feature, subsystem, creative UI, architecture change, or unclear request. Not for an already-scoped bug fix, an existing implementation plan, or a narrow code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares and controls software releases with risk classification, CI quality gates, artifact provenance, feature flags, staged rollout, measurable promotion and rollback thresholds, post-deploy verification, and cleanup. Use for deployment pipelines, launch readiness, canaries, production rollout, release automation, or rollback planning. Not for merely merging a completed development branch or proving one local change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes an approved implementation plan through fresh implementer and reviewer agents for each task, with explicit handoffs, focused tests, and task-by-task integration. Use for multi-task work where independent agent context improves implementation and review quality. Not for a single small edit, an unresolved design, or a failure that still needs root-cause analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Threat-models and hardens an application, API, data flow, dependency, or deployment against authentication and authorization flaws, injection, secrets exposure, unsafe deserialization, SSRF, abuse, privacy loss, and supply-chain risk. Use for security review, threat modeling, hardening, or sensitive changes. Not for generic code style review or an unexplained bug without a security hypothesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grounds version-sensitive engineering decisions in authoritative current sources by detecting the installed stack, retrieving official documentation or source, reconciling conflicts, and recording citations and confidence. Use for framework APIs, dependency behavior, standards, compatibility, migrations, or technical recommendations that may have changed. Not for stable project-local logic or broad product discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates a bug, failing test, build error, regression, flaky behavior, performance symptom, or unexpected result by reproducing it, minimizing the case, testing ranked hypotheses, tracing the first incorrect state, and locking the root cause with a regression check. Use before proposing a fix. Not for planning a new feature or reviewing a healthy diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements behavior changes with a test-first red-green-refactor loop: write one meaningful failing test, watch it fail for the intended reason, make the smallest change, then refactor while green. Use for new behavior, bug fixes, refactors with preserved contracts, and regression tests. Not required for disposable prototypes, generated files, or documentation-only edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans risk-based test coverage for a feature, service, release, or system by mapping user and business risk to test levels, environments, data, failure paths, automation, exploratory checks, and release gates. Use when choosing what to test or how much evidence is enough. Not for writing one test case, applying TDD to a single behavior, or debugging a failing test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。