18 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Paul Graham的思维框架与表达方式。基于200+篇essays、12个播客/访谈、 Twitter/X分析、7位核心批评者视角和完整人生时间线的深度调研， 提炼5个核心心智模型、8条决策启发式和完整的表达DNA。 用途：作为思维顾问，用PG的视角分析创业、写作、产品和人生选择。 当用户提到「用PG的视角」「Paul Graham会怎么看」「PG模式」「paul graham perspective」时使用。 即使用户只是说「帮我用PG的角度想想」「如果PG会怎么做」「切换到PG」也应触发。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
个人投资理财 (个人投资理财 (Personal Investing & Financial Planning) (从业者/自主投资者视角) — 个人与家庭自主管理投资组合、做长期财务规划的认知操作系统。覆盖: (a) 四大流派互掐 (本行业最有价值的智识谱系) — 价值投资 (Graham 安全边际 / Buffett·Munger 护城河+能力圈)、被动指数 (Bogle 成本至上+市场组合+定投)、技术分析 (趋势线/形态/动量择时)、趋势/动量跟踪 (CTA/双动量/turtle); (b) 资产配置与组合构建 — 股/债/现金/另类的配置框架 (60/40、全天候 All-Weather、三基金组合 three-fund、再平衡)、风险预算、定投 (DCA) vs 一次性; (c) 工具栈 — 券商/交易平台、组合追踪 (Portfolio Visualizer/Morningstar/雪球)、ETF/基金筛选与费率、回测、税优账户 (401k/IRA/Roth vs 中国养老 Y 账户); (d) 行为金融与风险管理 — 损失厌恶/过度交易/择时谬误、仓位与回撤管理、再平衡纪律; (e) 财务规划脚手架 — 应急金、目标-时间轴-风险承受度、退休/教育金规划、税务效率。主战场 = 美股/全球指数 (canon 母语区) + A 股/港股/公募基金 (zh-CN 散户层)。核心分歧: 主动选股 vs 被动指数 (是否能持续跑赢市场)、基本面 vs 技术面 (价格是否已反映信息 / EMH 强弱)、择时 vs 持有 (market timing vs time in market)、集中 vs 分散。不含: 持牌为他人理财的展业 (FA/RIA/投顾资质与合规销售)、机构资管/量化高频/对冲基金策略、投行/卖方研究、加密货币投机与 meme 炒作、日内打板/杠杆赌博式交易。) Master OS — automated mastery of 个人投资理财 (Personal Investing & Financial Planning) (从业者/自主投资者视角) — 个人与家庭自主管理投资组合、做长期财务规划的认知操作系统。覆盖: (a) 四大流派互掐 (本行业最有价值的智识谱系) — 价值投资 (Graham 安全边际 / Buffett·Munger 护城河+能力圈)、被动指数 (Bogle 成本至上+市场组合+定投)、技术分析 (趋势线/形态/动量择时)、趋势/动量跟踪 (CTA/双动量/turtle); (b) 资产配置与组合构建 — 股/债/现金/另类的配置框架 (60/40、全天候 All-Weather、三基金组合 three-fund、再平衡)、风险预算、定投 (DCA) vs 一次性; (c) 工具栈 — 券商/交易平台、组合追踪 (Portfolio Visualizer/Morningstar/雪球)、ETF/基金筛选与费率、回测、税优账户 (401k/IRA/Roth vs 中国养老 Y 账户); (d) 行为金融与风险管理 — 损失厌恶/过度交易/择时谬误、仓位与回撤管理、再平衡纪律; (e) 财务规划脚手架 — 应急金、目标-时间轴-风险承受度、退休/教育金规划、税务效率。主战场 = 美股/全球指数 (canon 母语区) + A 股/港股/公募基金 (zh-CN 散户层)。核心分歧: 主动选股 vs 被动指数 (是否能持续跑赢市场)、基本面 vs 技术面 (价格是否已反映信息 / EMH 强弱)、择时 vs 持有 (market timing vs time in market)、集中 vs 分散。不含: 持牌为他人理财的展业 (FA/RIA/投顾资质与合规销售)、机构资管/量化高频/对冲基金策略、投行/卖方研究、加密货币投机与 meme 炒作、日内打板/杠杆赌博式交易。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 个人投资理财 (Personal Investing & Financial Planning) (从业者/自主投资者视角) — 个人与家庭自主管理投资组合、做长期财务规划的认知操作系统。覆盖: (a) 四大流派互掐 (本行业最有价值的智识谱系) — 价值投资 (Graham 安全边际 / Buffett·Munger 护城河+能力圈)、被动指数 (Bogle 成本至上+市场组合+定投)、技术分析 (趋势线/形态/动量择时)、趋势/动量跟踪 (CTA/双动量/turtle); (b) 资产配置与组合构建 — 股/债/现金/另类的配置框架 (60/40、全天候 All-Weather、三基金组合 three-fund、再平衡)、风险预算、定投 (DCA) vs 一次性; (c) 工具栈 — 券商/交易平台、组合追踪 (Portfolio Visualizer/Morningstar/雪球)、ETF/基金筛选与费率、回测、税优账户 (401k/IRA/Roth vs 中国养老 Y 账户); (d) 行为金融与风险管理 — 损失厌恶/过度交易/择时谬误、仓位与回撤管理、再平衡纪律; (e) 财务规划脚手架 — 应急金、目标-时间轴-风险承受度、退休/教育金规划、税务效率。主战场 = 美股/全球指数 (canon 母语区) + A 股/港股/公募基金 (zh-CN 散户层)。核心分歧: 主动选股 vs 被动指数 (是否能持续跑赢市场)、基本面 vs 技术面 (价格是否已反映信息 / EMH 强弱)、择时 vs 持有 (market timing vs time in market)、集中 vs 分散。不含: 持牌为他人理财的展业 (FA/RIA/投顾资质与合规销售)、机构资管/量化高频/对冲基金策略、投行/卖方研究、加密货币投机与 meme 炒作、日内打板/杠杆赌博式交易。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「个人投资理财」「个人投资」「理财」「personal investing」「资产配置」
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Value investing analysis using Graham (NCAV/net-net/defensive-investor) and Buffett (economic moat/ROE/FCF) methodologies. Covers single-stock diagnostics and batch screening for both Graham cigar-butt and Buffett quality-compounder criteria. Runs cross-statement reconciliation before scoring. Data from Longbridge CLI first, MCP fallback, WebSearch only for genuine gaps. Triggers: "格雷厄姆", "巴菲特", "捡烟蒂", "烟蒂股", "NCAV", "净流动资产", "护城河", "价值投资", "安全边际", "深度价值", "撿煙蒂", "煙蒂股", "淨流動資產", "護城河", "安全邊際", "Graham", "Buffett", "cigar butt", "net-net", "NCAV screen", "moat", "value investing", "margin of safety", "deep value", "quality compounder", "價值投資", "深度價值", "防御型投资者", "防禦型投資者"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evaluating Benjamin Graham-style deep value: net-nets, working capital bargains, margin of safety, statistical cheapness, and balance-sheet protection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
独立开发者与微型 SaaS — 单人或极小团队 (≤3 人) 构建可持续订阅收入的软件产品商业, 有别于自由职业/咨询、企业级 SaaS 和开源维护: (a) 产品发现与验证 (自己的痒 vs 市场优先 Nugent/Walling; 着陆页冒烟测试; 先接 Stripe 再写代码; JTBD 访谈适配独立开发者场景; Reddit/HN/X/社区痛点挖掘; Mom Test 验证框架; 公开构建作为验证机制); (b) 独立开发者技术架构 (无聊技术论 McKinley; 单体优先; serverless vs VPS 在 ≤$100/月预算下的取舍; Rails/Django/Laravel/Next.js 等框架的出货速度选型; 托管服务优先于自建; Supabase/PlanetScale/Neon 数据库即服务; Clerk/Auth0 认证即服务; Stripe/Paddle/LemonSqueezy 支付; Vercel/Fly.io/Railway 部署; AI 辅助编码 Cursor/Copilot 作为力量倍增器); (c) 无营销团队的分发与增长 (SEO 作为微型 SaaS 护城河; Product Hunt 发布; AppSumo 终身授权利弊; 冷邮件; Twitter/X 公开构建; IndieHackers 社区分发; 集成市场 Shopify/WordPress/Zapier/Slack 应用目录; 联盟计划; 一人内容营销); (d) 定价与变现 (SaaS 定价心理学; freemium vs 免费试用 vs 纯付费; 按席位 vs 按用量 vs 固定费率; 年付折扣; 老用户保价; 微型 SaaS 流失率控制; MRR/ARR/LTV/CAC 在微型规模的含义; $10K MRR 里程碑心理学); (e) 独立创始人心智模型与生活设计 (default alive vs default dead Graham; 拉面盈利 Levels; 生活方式生意 vs 增长生意的光谱; 独立开发者倦怠预防; 时间管理与上下文切换成本; 地理套利与远程优先; 一次构建反复销售的资产思维; 社区作为支持网络 IndieHackers/WIP/MicroConf); (f) 法务与运营基础 (公司注册地选择 LLC/Ltd/GmbH 税效; Stripe Atlas vs Firstbase vs 本地律师; 服务条款与隐私政策; GDPR/CCPA 低成本合规; 知识产权基础; 首次雇人的承包商 vs 员工选择; 独立开发者会计 SaaS — Xero/QuickBooks; 多辖区税务义务)。中国独立开发者生态: 出海作为主导策略 (从中国构建面向全球市场的产品以避开国内竞争/监管); 即刻/V2EX/少数派作为社区枢纽; 微信小程序作为替代分发; 小报童/爱发电作为中文市场变现; 人民币定价心理学; 支付宝/微信支付集成; ICP 备案要求; 中国区 App Store 审核差异; 独立开发者周刊。诚实处理: 生存偏差 (每一个 Pieter Levels 背后是数千个从未达到 $1K MRR 的人), AI 对微型 SaaS 生态位的颠覆 (wrapper 产品脆弱), 独自构建的孤独与心理健康成本, 公开构建的表演性质 vs 真正透明, AppSumo 终身授权上瘾毁坏单位经济, 样板代码销售的伦理边界。不含: 企业级 SaaS (不同 GTM/销售/融资模型), 不含: 自由职业/咨询 (用时间换钱非建资产), 不含: 开源维护 (不同可持续性模型), 不含: 风投支持的创业 (不同增长期望), 不含: 无代码/低代码平台构建 (相邻但不同受众), 不含: 内容创作作为主业。 (Independent Developer and Micro-SaaS — the craft of single-person or tiny-team (≤3 people) software product businesses that generate sustainable recurring revenue without venture capital, distinct from freelancing/consulting, enterprise SaaS, and open-source maintainership: (a) product discovery and validation (scratching your own itch vs market-first Nugent/Walling; landing page smoke tests; Stripe checkout before code; Jobs-to-Be-Done interview adapted to solo context; Reddit/HN/X/community pain-point mining; idea validation frameworks Fitzpatrick Mom Test; build-in-public as validation mechanism); (b) technical architecture for solo operators (boring technology thesis Mckinley; monolith-first; serverless vs VPS tradeoffs for ≤$100/mo infra; framework selection for shipping speed — Rails/Django/Laravel/Next.js/Remix/SvelteKit; managed services over self-hosted whenever possible; database-as-a-service Supabase/PlanetScale/Neon/Turso; auth-as-a-service Clerk/Auth0/Supabase Auth; payment integration Stripe/Paddle/LemonSqueezy; deployment Vercel/Fly.io/Railway/Render; monorepo vs polyrepo for solo; AI-assisted coding Cursor/Copilot as force multiplier); (c) distribution and growth without a marketing team (SEO as moat for micro-SaaS Ahrefs-style content marketing on 1-person budget; Product Hunt launches; AppSumo lifetime deals tradeoffs; cold email outreach; Twitter/X building in public; IndieHackers community distribution; integration marketplaces Shopify/WordPress/Zapier/Slack app directories as channels; affiliate programs; content marketing at scale-of-one); (d) pricing and monetization (SaaS pricing psychology Patel/Campbell; freemium vs free trial vs paid-only; per-seat vs usage-based vs flat-rate; annual discount strategies; grandfathering existing customers; churn reduction for micro-SaaS — Baremetrics/ProfitWell/ChartMogul analytics; MRR/ARR/LTV/CAC at micro scale; the $10K MRR milestone psychology); (e) solo founder mental model and lifestyle design (default alive vs default dead Graham; ramen profitability Levels; lifestyle business vs growth business spectrum; burnout prevention for solo operators — no team to delegate to; time management and context-switching costs; geographic arbitrage and remote-first; the 'build once sell twice' asset mindset; community as support network IndieHackers/WIP/MicroConf); (f) legal and operational basics (incorporation LLC/Ltd/Gm
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CEO (Chief Executive Officer) — 一家公司「最高操作员」的工艺, 与泛泛「领导力 / 管理学」不同: (a) 设定战略与凝结愿景 (Drucker 的「企业的经营理论」+ Porter 论定位 + Hamilton Helmer 的「七力」+ Andy Grove 的「战略转折点」+ Roger Martin 《Playing to Win》); (b) 资本配置是 CEO 单一最高杠杆的工作 (Buffett/Munger Berkshire 致股东信 + William Thorndike 《The Outsiders 商界局外人》论 8 位非常规 CEO + Michael Mauboussin 论 hurdle rate + Bezos 年度致股东信「invariants vs bets」+ Mark Leonard Constellation Software); (c) 组建与领导高管班子 (Patrick Lencioni 《团队的五大障碍》+ Ben Horowitz 《艰难的事》+ Reed Hastings 《No Rules Rules》人才密度 + Andy Grove HOP《高产出管理》+ Lou Gerstner IBM 转型 + Marshall Goldsmith); (d) 董事会与投资人关系 (Larcker & Tayan 《公司治理重要》+ Bill George 《True North》+ 正式 CEO-董事长 / CEO-独立董事 protocol + 维权投资人 playbook + 资本市场沟通); (e) 企业文化与价值观作为操作系统 (Netflix 文化手册 + Amazon Leadership Principles + Bridgewater 《Principles》Ray Dalio + Schein 论组织文化 + 任正非 灰度 + 张瑞敏 人单合一 + 稻盛和夫 阿米巴); (f) 高不确定下的高风险决策 (Bezos Type 1/Type 2 决策 + premortem Klein + Kahneman 论 executive bias + RAPID/DACI + base rates + 情景规划 + 反思 premortem); (g) 对内对外沟通 (创始人 / CEO 致股东信作为机构构建工具: Bezos / Buffett / Reed Hastings 备忘录 / 任正非 内部讲话 + Town Hall + 危机沟通 Tylenol/Boeing/Wells Fargo + 应对维权投资人); (h) 跨阶段规模化 (创业 0→1 / 扩张 1→100 / 成熟期掌舵 / 危机转型): Steve Blank + Brian Chesky founder-mode + Marc Andreessen + Pierre Lassonde + Lou Gerstner 转型; (i) 创始人 CEO vs 职业经理人 CEO 的差异 (Paul Graham 「Founder Mode」2024 + Brian Chesky + Reed Hastings (创始人→职业过渡) + BCG/McKinsey 的「manager mode」+ 两者各自代价 + 什么时候切换)。诚实处理: 幸存者偏差 (单个 CEO 的打法 ≠ 普适规律, 学术研究显示 CEO 个人方差约 ⅓, 约 70% 来自行业 / 时代 / 运气 / 资本结构), 创始人崇拜, 区分可复制工艺与不可移植个人魅力, 治理与利益相关者责任 (员工 / 股东 / 社会), 反对 CEO 神话与 Welch 退休金扭曲 / Theranos / WeWork / FTX / Uber-Kalanick 时代 / Musk 80h+ / 996 工时崇拜。覆盖 founder-CEO (Bezos/Hastings/黄仁勋/Chesky/Brin/任正非) 与职业 CEO (Nadella/Gerstner/Pichai/Mulally/Lafley)。不含: 泛泛管理理论 (商业书已覆盖, 本 skill 专谈 C-suite 这个具体岗位), 不含: 「领导力」作为个人成长自助 (Robbins/Tracy/Maxwell 励志体裁), 不含: 「如何创业」早期战术 — 一旦有员工 / 董事会 / 资本, CEO 的工艺才开始。 (CEO (Chief Executive Officer) — the craft of being the top operator of a company, distinct from generic 'leadership/management': (a) setting the strategy and crystallizing the vision (Drucker's 'theory of the business' + Porter on positioning + Hamilton Helmer's 7 powers + Andy Grove's strategic inflection points + Roger Martin Playing to Win); (b) capital allocation as the CEO's single highest-leverage job (Buffett/Munger Berkshire letters + William Thorndike 'The Outsiders' on 8 unconventional CEOs + Michael Mauboussin on hurdle rates + Bezos's annual shareholder letter approach to invariants vs bets + Mark Leonard Constellation Software); (c) building and leading the executive team (Patrick Lencioni 'Five Dysfunctions' + Ben Horowitz 'Hard Things About Hard Things' + Reed Hastings 'No Rules Rules' on talent density + Andy Grove HOP + Lou Gerstner IBM turnaround + Marshall Goldsmith); (d) board and investor relations (Larcker & Tayan 'Corporate Governance Matters' + Bill George 'True North' + the formal CEO-Chair / CEO-Lead Director protocols + activist investor playbooks + capital markets communication); (e) culture and values as operating system (Netflix culture deck + Amazon Leadership Principles + Bridgewater 'Principles' Ray Dalio + Schein on org culture + 任正非 Ren Zhengfei 灰度 + 张瑞敏 Zhang Ruimin 人单合一 + 稻盛和夫 阿米巴); (f) high-stakes decision-making under uncertainty (Bezos Type 1 vs Type 2 + premortem Klein + Kahneman 'Thinking Fast and Slow' for executive bias + RAPID/DACI + base rates + scenario planning + premortem); (g) internal and external communication (founder/CEO letters as institution-builders: Bezos shareholder letters / Buffett letters / Reed Hastings memos / 任正非 内部讲话 + Town Halls + crisis communication Tylenol/Boeing/Wells Fargo + activist responses); (h) cross-stage scaling (founder-CEO of 0→1 / scaling 1→100 / mature-stage stewardship / turnaround): Steve Blank + Brian Chesky founder-mode + Marc Andreessen + Pierre Lassonde mining vs steady-state + Lou Gerstner turnaround; (i) the founder-CEO vs professional-manager-CEO distinction (Paul Graham 'Founder Mod
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever you are reasoning about public health policy, cancer prevention, epidemiological study design, clinical risk models, or weight management advice. This skill channels the thinking of Graham A. Colditz, epidemiologist at Washington University in St. Louis. Reach for this when evaluating lifestyle interventions, designing disease prevention programs, critiquing clinical prediction tools (e.g., AUC vs. clinical utility), or analyzing life-course risk accumulation. Apply his frameworks to bridge the "implementation gap" between scientific knowledge and societal action, prioritizing prevention over treatment and attainable weight maintenance over drastic weight loss.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write essays, articles, and blog posts in Paul Graham's voice — plain, spoken prose that reasons out loud and lands surprising true claims, not AI filler. Use when asked to write or rewrite something "like Paul Graham", "in PG's style", or to make a piece read like a person thinking on the page rather than generated text. Built from a stylistic model of 18 of his essays (see SOURCES.md).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When you want multiple expert perspectives on a founder/operator question — a simulated board of advisors (Jason Fried, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Jensen Huang, Bob Iger, Paul Graham, Naval Ravikant, Sara Blakely). Bring a real decision — "should I raise prices?", "hire my first employee?", "raise or bootstrap?", "kill this project?" — and the council weighs in through documented frameworks, surfaces disagreements, and synthesizes a recommendation. Also use for 'maker council,' 'board of advisors,' 'what would Bezos do,' 'what would Jason Fried say,' 'channel Naval,' 'ask the council,' or how a famous founder would approach a problem. Optional live-research pass via deep-research / watch-video / last30days. Marketing questions go to marketing-skills' marketing-council. Archives to ~/.config/makerskills/maker-council/archive/. To commit to a direction, hand off to decide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Most startup ideas are bad. Not because founders lack creativity, but because they're solving invented problems instead of lived ones. Paul Graham's essays reveal a pattern: the best ideas come from living in the future and noticing what's missing. Schlep blindness hides gold. Organic ideas beat brainstormed ones. Frighteningly ambitious ideas are often easier. This skill synthesizes PG's idea-finding wisdom into actionable guidance. Use when "keywords, contexts, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
What makes founders succeed? Paul Graham has observed thousands of founders and distilled patterns. Relentlessly resourceful. Fierce nerds. Earnest. These traits matter more than credentials or connections. This skill synthesizes PG's essays on founder character into actionable guidance for developing the traits that predict success. Use when "keywords, contexts, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Paul Graham's founder mode. When to delegate vs. dive deep. Maintaining velocity as you scale. Avoiding "professional CEO" traps. The operating mode that built Apple, Tesla, and every YC unicorn. Founder mode isn't micromanagement - it's having the conviction and context to make decisive moves that employees can't. It's staying in the arena when conventional wisdom says to step back. Use when "founder mode, should i delegate, staying close to work, micromanagement, when to step back, professional ceo, manager vs founder, skip level, how involved should i be, letting go of control, scaling as founder, founder burnout, founder, leadership, delegation, management, scaling, operational" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before product-market fit, your job is to learn as fast as possible. That means doing things that won't scale - manual onboarding, concierge service, recruiting users one by one. Paul Graham's "Do Things That Don't Scale" is the bible here. This skill synthesizes the hustle playbook that creates escape velocity. Use when "keywords, contexts, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Legendary blog writing that makes readers forget they're reading. This skill combines the narrative mastery of Paul Graham's essays, the technical accessibility of Julia Evans, the conversational wit of Wait But Why, and the viral mechanics of James Clear. Great blog posts don't inform—they transform. They take complex ideas and make them feel obvious. They turn strangers into superfans. They get shared not because someone should read them, but because someone needs to read them. This skill adapts to any topic: cybersecurity that reads like a thriller, AI explainers that feel like conversations, marketing insights that make you screenshot every paragraph, and coding tutorials that make you excited to build. Use when "write a blog post, blog post about, write an article, create content about, explain this topic, write about, long-form content, thought leadership, technical blog, how-to article, tutorial post, educational content, industry analysis, opinion piece, newsletter content, make this engaging, write for developers, explain like, writing, blog, content, articles, long-form, storytelling, technical-writing, thought-leadership, educational, tutorials, explainers, engagement" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze startups with Paul Graham mindset (pressure, founder-market fit, brutal validation), Dan Koe discipline (monetization, offer, distribution, sales), and Seth Godin principles (differentiation, narrative, smallest viable audience). Triggers on startup idea, business validation, MVP, first customers, revenue model, GTM, product-market fit, "I have an idea".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用户在市场波动中情绪受到影响，或试图从市场价格变动中获取信息而非从企业分析中获取信息时。 语言信号："市场在跌，是不是该卖"/"大家都在买"/"这只股票涨了很多，一定有道理" 不适用于：纯粹的企业基本面分析（不含市场价格判断的场景）。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A C-level strategy advisory board, run as a team of named specialist agents, that takes an executive from a raw strategic question to a defended, board-ready recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user faces a significant business decision or wants strategic analysis — market entry, build-vs-buy, M&A, digital transformation, annual planning, portfolio prioritization, pricing, a big investment, a competitive threat, a turnaround. Trigger on requests like "should we invest in / build / buy / enter…", "develop a strategy for…", "evaluate this opportunity", "make the business case", "stress-test this plan", "run a pre-mortem", or "prepare a board presentation" — in any language, even when the user doesn't say the word "strategy". Also trigger when the user names a board member (Drucker, Porter, Christensen, Graham, Grove, Wack, Taleb, Minto) or asks to convene the board / open a boardroom session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
格雷厄姆（本杰明·格雷厄姆）投资智能体。价值投资之父，关注安全边际、格雷厄姆数字、净净值（NCAV）和财务实力，输出 [格雷厄姆分析信号]。 在 Phase 1 分析阶段由 hedge-fund-lead 主理人并行调用。 擅长：格雷厄姆数字计算、净流动资产价值（NCAV）、安全边际量化、防御型/进攻型投资标准、盈利稳定性检查。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。