39 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python. Use for detecting harmful content in text and images with multi-severity classification. Triggers: "azure-ai-contentsafety", "ContentSafetyClient", "content moderation", "harmful content", "text analysis", "image analysis".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure AI Content Safety REST SDK for TypeScript workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Analyze text and images for harmful content with customizable blocklists and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure AI Content Safety REST SDK for TypeScript workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Analyze text and images for harmful content with customizable blocklists and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python. Use for detecting harmful content in text and images with multi-severity classification. Triggers: "azure-ai-contentsafety", "ContentSafetyClient", "content moderation", "harmful content", "text analysis", "image analysis".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze text and images for harmful content with customizable blocklists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python. Use for detecting harmful content in text and images with multi-severity classification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run structured AI red team exercises for jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration risk, harmful output controls, and agent tool abuse resilience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Anthropic's method for training harmless AI through self-improvement. Two-phase approach - supervised learning with self-critique/revision, then RLAIF (RL from AI Feedback). Use for safety alignment, reducing harmful outputs without human labels. Powers Claude's safety system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Anthropic's method for training harmless AI through self-improvement. Two-phase approach - supervised learning with self-critique/revision, then RLAIF (RL from AI Feedback). Use for safety alignment, reducing harmful outputs without human labels. Powers Claude's safety system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit websites, apps, screenshots, mockups, and design code for harmful AI-design clichés, generic generated defaults, and established UI defects. Use when the user wants evidence-backed design feedback, an anti-slop review, or a removal-first cleanup plan without a speculative redesign.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze text and images for harmful content using Azure AI Content Safety (@azure-rest/ai-content-safety). Use when moderating user-generated content, detecting hate speech, violence, sexual content, or self-harm, or managing custom blocklists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the reflex is to add a feature, layer, or process. Prefer removing harmful or nonessential elements first, with an irreversibility guard before deletion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authors Vally conformance tests for prompts, instructions, agents, and skills, and refuses jailbreak, prompt-injection, harmful-elicitation, TOS, CoC, and PII-extraction stimuli
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run structured AI red team exercises for jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration risk, harmful output controls, and agent tool abuse resilience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to test their LLM/agent application for safety and security vulnerabilities — jailbreaks, prompt injection, PII extraction, harmful content generation, or evaluator gaming. Also use when the user mentions security testing, adversarial testing, red teaming, safety evaluation, ASR (Attack Success Rate), or "is my app safe to deploy." Outputs ASR paired with over-refusal rate and an audit document.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (NIST AI 100-1 + the NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile) to a specific AI system, governance question, or impact assessment. Three modes — consult, governance plan, full assessment — all cite Subcategories (`GOVERN 1.1`) and Profile Action IDs (`GV-1.2-001`) verbatim. Use when the user mentions the AI RMF, NIST RMF, NIST AI 100-1, NIST AI 600-1, GenAI Profile, the four functions (Govern / Map / Measure / Manage), the trustworthy AI characteristics, the 12 GAI risks (confabulation, harmful bias, information integrity, CBRN, data privacy, etc.), or asks "what does NIST say about X" for an AI system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run structured AI red team exercises for jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration risk, harmful output controls, and agent tool abuse resilience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement safety guardrails for AI systems — content filtering, prompt injection detection, output validation, bias mitigation, and responsible AI practices. Use when tasks involve adding safety layers to LLM applications, detecting prompt injection attacks, filtering harmful content, implementing rate limiting for AI APIs, validating LLM outputs against schemas, building moderation pipelines, or ensuring AI systems comply with safety policies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python. Use for detecting harmful content in text and images with multi-severity classification and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python. Use for detecting harmful content in text and images with multi-severity classification and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Field identification of fungi using morphological features, spore prints, habitat analysis, and seasonal context with a safety-first approach. Covers cap, gill, stem, and spore characteristics, look-alike differentiation, toxicity risk assessment, and the critical rule of absolute certainty before consumption. Use when encountering an unknown fungus, foraging for edible mushrooms and needing to confirm species before consumption, assessing whether fungi in a garden or property are harmful, or differentiating an edible species from a dangerous look-alike.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design reliable, safe, and trustworthy agent systems that fail gracefully and operate within bounds. Use when building guardrails, handling edge cases, preventing harmful outputs, monitoring for failures, implementing safety constraints, or designing error recovery. Covers failure modes, constraint systems, oversight mechanisms, and safety validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python. Use for detecting harmful content in text and images with multi-severity classification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze text and images for harmful content with customizable blocklists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。