「intake」の検索結果

intake 全 JSON を統合したいとき、intake.md と intake.json を Jinja2 で render して quality_gate と cross_check を通したいときに使う。

This skill should be used when handling issue intake rotation duties for the Positron repository. It provides workflows for reviewing and organizing new issues, responding to discussions, handling support tickets, and searching for related content. Use this skill when on intake rotation duty, when helping someone with intake tasks, or when learning the intake rotation process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a multi-channel DSAR intake system supporting web form, email, phone, and in-person requests with identity verification tiers, automated routing logic, SLA tracking, and response generation. Activate for DSAR intake, rights request portal, multi-channel intake, SLA tracking, request management queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start a new prospect's intake, with or without their files in hand — a request naming a new prospect and attaching no documents is a normal starting point, because Step 1 searches the connected tools or asks the advisor to upload. Cleans and normalizes their account files (statements, exports, screenshots) into a consolidated view, then hands back a plain-English prospect summary, a detailed analyst handoff the full proposal gets built from, and a friendly "what to expect" memo, offered as a Gmail draft on approval. Does not produce the proposal, recommend an allocation, or quote fees. Triggers on "prospect intake", "/prospect-intake", "new prospect intake", "clean up [prospect]'s statements", "process [prospect]'s files", "what to expect note for [prospect]" — and on how an advisor raises a new prospect before any file exists: "I met with a potential client/customer", "[name] is interested in becoming a client", "I have a new prospect", "how should I proceed with [name]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use on any core for first-run planning intake — Phase 0 runs the vendored BMAD-METHOD planning shelf, shared by every core, and Phase 1 (mining `04-prd.md` into intent records plus the Add-ons/sync-and-remote-entities decision) is full-stack-app's and pwa-app's shared procedure — identical mechanics, a different decision at step 5/8. Phase 0 also defines compressed intake, the path a user's explicit "just build it" choice takes on full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored, and copywriting cores: one batched round of questions in place of the shelf, writing a thinned archive at the same paths so Phase 1 (or, on copywriting, that core's own mining step), `ux-planner`, and the Re-entry pass all keep their documented source. Also use for the Re-entry pass, which mines new scope into additional intents without re-running the shelf, on any core with a module axis to add an intent to (full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored) — landing-page has none, so its own new-scope path runs through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s Correction Protocol instead. Invoked by the `planner` agent, which decides the path; don't run standalone. landing-page runs this skill's Phase 0 on first run, then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s own planning-intake section, that core's counterpart to this skill's Phase 1. copywriting runs this skill's Phase 0 the same way (full or compressed), then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-copywriting-loop`'s own planning-intake section into a what/audience/register brief — no module axis, so its own new-scope path runs through that loop's Correction Protocol rather than the Re-entry pass below. An authored core runs this skill's Phase 0, then `hedgehog-core-design`, then this skill's Phase 1 mining against the designed layer sequence. A brownfield adoption (`hedgehog-adopt`) never runs this skill's shelf at all — the drivers BMAD elicits are already settled facts of a repo that already exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-review intake closing skill. After an intake is resolved (whether accepted via review/meta PR merge or rejected/deferred at triage/evidence review), run this skill to post standardized, personalized closing comments on the PR (if any) and each intake issue. Comments include: evidence pipeline findings with /trust-appraise TM output, per-row artifact scores, decisions rationale, path-to-promotion/acceptance guidance, and a mandatory badge status note including the universal Powered by Gaia badge. Use after curation completes, before or immediately after merge for accepted intakes, or immediately upon rejection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a recruiter-hiring manager intake meeting to kick off a search. Use when the user says "I need to kick off hiring", "run the intake call", "prepare for the intake meeting", "align with the hiring manager on this role", "we're opening a req", or wants to define hiring criteria and process before sourcing begins - even if they don't explicitly say "intake meeting". Also use when a recruiter needs to get a hiring manager aligned on what "great" looks like before anyone talks to a single candidate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

intake セッション起動直後にパターン・深度・痛点 3 軸を確定したいとき、run-skill-intake から phase 1 として呼ばれて kickoff.json を生成したいときに使う。

Structured intake — practice-area templates, cross-area issue spotting, conflict flags, and triage classification. Produces a formatted case summary the student analyzes and the professor reviews. Does NOT decide case acceptance. Use when starting a new client intake, running an intake interview, or writing up a new client's situation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Chat report that should become a GitHub issue: turn a public chat report into a confirmed, verified issue package. Use when the user says: github-issue-intake, github issue intake, issue intake, file this as an issue, file a github issue, open a github issue, create a github issue, submit a github issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

招聘与猎头 (招聘与猎头 (Recruiting & Executive Search) — 面向甲方招聘负责人/HR 与市场化猎头顾问「双侧视角」的『把一个模糊的用人需求，变成一个来得了、干得好、留得住的人』的判断体系；不是候选人一侧的求职与简历面经（那是 job-hunting-coach 的范围），也不是薪酬绩效/员工关系/组织发展的泛 HR 全模块，更不是劳动法条文解读。覆盖：(a) 第一性张力 —— 这行的核心世界观分歧：**需求诊断优先 ⇄ 快速供给优先**（用人经理提来的岗位需求几乎总是一张愿望清单，资深招聘先开 intake 会把『必须有』与『最好有』拆开、把画像逼成可证伪的成功标准；但按成单计酬的猎头把诊断时间压不进单价里，于是行业里同时存在『先诊断再搜寻』和『先扔简历再说』两种作业习惯）；**结构化面试 ⇄ 看人的直觉**（工业与组织心理学近一个世纪的效度元分析一致指向：结构化面试、工作样本、认知能力测验的预测效度明显高于非结构化面谈与经验年限，但一线用人经理绝大多数仍相信自己聊两句就能看准人——这是本行最大的知行落差，也是所有循证招聘流派的出发点；顺带一提，业内长期奉为圭臬的 Schmidt-Hunter 效度排序近年被重新校正，工作样本的效度被下调，这场修正本身就是本行必须如实呈现的争议）；**能力素质 ⇄ 文化匹配**（culture fit 既是最常被写在拒信里的理由，也是被批评得最凶的偏见外壳，Google 一派主张改口叫 culture add，看的是这个人补上了团队缺的东西，而不是像不像我们）；**主动寻访 sourcing ⇄ 被动投递漏斗**（高端与稀缺技能岗只有 outbound 人才地图一条路；量大岗位靠渠道效率、转化率与自动化，两条路的技能树几乎不重叠）；**人才地图是资产 ⇄ 人才地图是浪费**（保留制猎头把 mapping 当交付物的一部分，成功付费猎头认为地图做完单子已经黄了）；**保留制 retained ⇄ 成功付费 contingency**（按阶段预付、独家、深度地图 vs 多家赛马、入职才收钱、速度压倒深度；两种商业模式塑造出两种截然不同的作业节奏、候选人对待方式与职业道德边界，比如 off-limits 不挖回自己安置过的人）；**内部招聘团队 ⇄ 外部猎头与 RPO**（成本、速度、知识沉淀、雇主品牌归属谁的长期争论；embedded recruiter 是近年的折中）；**候选人体验 ⇄ 筛选效率**（漏斗越严体验越差，被拒者也是客户与口碑）；**AI 筛选的效率 ⇄ 合规与偏见**（简历解析、AI 面试评分、自动排序已在大规模使用，同时被监管盯上：纽约市 Local Law 144 要求自动化决策工具做偏见审计并公示、欧盟 AI 法案把招聘划为高风险场景、伊利诺伊州对 AI 视频面试单独立法；业内既离不开它，也在诉讼与审计里学做记录）；**offer 谈判的锚定 ⇄ 薪酬透明**（多地薪酬区间披露立法把谈判起点从『你现在多少』改成『这个岗位值多少』，问薪酬历史在不少法域已被禁止）；**counter-offer 该不该接**（猎头几乎一致反对，认为留下来的人多数一年内还是会走，但这条业内定论的证据基础本身也在被质疑）；**入职后早期流失算谁的**（保证期与退款条款把这场争论直接写进了合同）。(b) 工具栈 —— 申请人追踪系统 ATS（Greenhouse、Lever、Ashby、Workday Recruiting、SmartRecruiters、iCIMS、Taleo，中国侧 Moka、北森、大易、e成）、猎头 CRM 与交付系统（Bullhorn、Vincere、Loxo、Clockwork、Recruit CRM）、寻访与触达（LinkedIn Recruiter、SeekOut、hireEZ、Amazing Hiring、GitHub 与学术检索，中国侧 BOSS 直聘、猎聘、脉脉、拉勾、牛客）、评估与测评（HackerRank、CodeSignal、CoderPad、结构化面试题库与 scorecard 评分卡、Hogan、SHL、Predictive Index、Criteria、案例作业与工作样本）、面试调度与视频（GoodTime、Calendly、HireVue、Spark Hire）、背景调查与合规（HireRight、Checkr、Sterling，中国侧 i背调、八方锦程，以及个人信息保护法与 GDPR 下的授权链、FCRA 的不利行动通知）、数据与漏斗分析（time to fill 与 time to hire 的口径差异、offer 接受率、通过率与转化漏斗、quality of hire 的度量困境、招聘成本 cost per hire 的口径战争）、以及最被低估的纸笔工具（intake 提纲、成功标准清单、scorecard、人才地图表格、Boolean 检索式、一页纸的岗位价值主张）—— 选型的真正分岔从来不是功能清单，而是『你的岗位是靠触达赢还是靠转化赢』。(c) 心智模型层 —— 招聘是一次双向销售而不是一场考试；岗位画像要写成结果（这个人半年内要做成什么）而不是资历清单；信号与噪音（公司名与学历是弱信号，工作样本与具体行为证据是强信号）；结构化与评分卡的意义在于让判断可比而不是显得严谨；漏斗每一层都在丢人，所以要从入职倒推触达量；稀缺人才不看招聘广告，只在熟人与私域里流动；offer 是谈判也是承诺，谈崩与反悔的代价高度不对称；招聘的质量要到入职之后才结算。(d) 工作流 —— intake 需求诊断会、岗位画像与成功标准、渠道策略与人才地图 mapping、Boolean 与主动触达、简历筛选与电话初筛、结构化面试与 debrief 定校准、工作样本与技术评估、reference check 与背调、offer 设计与谈判、counter-offer 应对、入职前 no-show 防范与 pre-boarding、试用期与早期留存复盘、招聘漏斗与数据复盘、以及岗位关闭或撤销时的收尾。(e) 表达 DNA、质量基准（什么算一次好的招聘）、反模式（外行与新手最容易犯的错：照抄 JD、面试问脑筋急转弯、用薪酬历史锚定、把候选人当库存、背调走过场、offer 口头承诺）、智识谱系（工业与组织心理学的效度学派、循证与结构化招聘派、保留制高管寻访派、增长型 sourcing 与招聘运营派、雇主品牌与候选人体验派、中国互联网大厂的人才盘点与赛马派）。) Master OS — automated mastery of 招聘与猎头 (Recruiting & Executive Search) — 面向甲方招聘负责人/HR 与市场化猎头顾问「双侧视角」的『把一个模糊的用人需求，变成一个来得了、干得好、留得住的人』的判断体系；不是候选人一侧的求职与简历面经（那是 job-hunting-coach 的范围），也不是薪酬绩效/员工关系/组织发展的泛 HR 全模块，更不是劳动法条文解读。覆盖：(a) 第一性张力 —— 这行的核心世界观分歧：**需求诊断优先 ⇄ 快速供给优先**（用人经理提来的岗位需求几乎总是一张愿望清单，资深招聘先开 intake 会把『必须有』与『最好有』拆开、把画像逼成可证伪的成功标准；但按成单计酬的猎头把诊断时间压不进单价里，于是行业里同时存在『先诊断再搜寻』和『先扔简历再说』两种作业习惯）；**结构化面试 ⇄ 看人的直觉**（工业与组织心理学近一个世纪的效度元分析一致指向：结构化面试、工作样本、认知能力测验的预测效度明显高于非结构化面谈与经验年限，但一线用人经理绝大多数仍相信自己聊两句就能看准人——这是本行最大的知行落差，也是所有循证招聘流派的出发点；顺带一提，业内长期奉为圭臬的 Schmidt-Hunter 效度排序近年被重新校正，工作样本的效度被下调，这场修正本身就是本行必须如实呈现的争议）；**能力素质 ⇄ 文化匹配**（culture fit 既是最常被写在拒信里的理由，也是被批评得最凶的偏见外壳，Google 一派主张改口叫 culture add，看的是这个人补上了团队缺的东西，而不是像不像我们）；**主动寻访 sourcing ⇄ 被动投递漏斗**（高端与稀缺技能岗只有 outbound 人才地图一条路；量大岗位靠渠道效率、转化率与自动化，两条路的技能树几乎不重叠）；**人才地图是资产 ⇄ 人才地图是浪费**（保留制猎头把 mapping 当交付物的一部分，成功付费猎头认为地图做完单子已经黄了）；**保留制 retained ⇄ 成功付费 contingency**（按阶段预付、独家、深度地图 vs 多家赛马、入职才收钱、速度压倒深度；两种商业模式塑造出两种截然不同的作业节奏、候选人对待方式与职业道德边界，比如 off-limits 不挖回自己安置过的人）；**内部招聘团队 ⇄ 外部猎头与 RPO**（成本、速度、知识沉淀、雇主品牌归属谁的长期争论；embedded recruiter 是近年的折中）；**候选人体验 ⇄ 筛选效率**（漏斗越严体验越差，被拒者也是客户与口碑）；**AI 筛选的效率 ⇄ 合规与偏见**（简历解析、AI 面试评分、自动排序已在大规模使用，同时被监管盯上：纽约市 Local Law 144 要求自动化决策工具做偏见审计并公示、欧盟 AI 法案把招聘划为高风险场景、伊利诺伊州对 AI 视频面试单独立法；业内既离不开它，也在诉讼与审计里学做记录）；**offer 谈判的锚定 ⇄ 薪酬透明**（多地

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ticket/PRD intake: product area classification, completeness scoring, RCA, technical assessment. Works with Jira (via mk:jira-issue / jira-as), Linear (via MCP), GitHub (via gh CLI), or manual paste. Triggers: 'analyze ticket', 'intake PRD', 'triage issue', 'classify ticket', 'check ticket'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns plain-language requests (emails, chat messages, form submissions, meeting asks, voicemail or call notes) into one intake record per request (what is asked, who asks and for whom, urgency as evidenced, category, suggested owner, missing information with draft clarifying questions) and a triage table sorted for the operations lead to act on. Use when the user asks to "log these requests", "triage this pile of asks", "turn this message into an intake record", "who should own this request", "what is missing before we can start" or "build today's intake list". Do not use for customer support tickets, use ticket-triage-pack instead; for clearing a personal mailbox by reply bucket, use inbox-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Intake a new matter — uniform questions covering identification, conflicts, source, risk triage, materiality, outside counsel, owners, legal hold, and key dates; writes matter.md and history.md and appends a structured row to _log.yaml. Use when the user says "new matter", "intake this matter", or wants to bring a new matter into the portfolio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-drafting context gathering for a demand letter — parties, facts, basis, leverage, BATNA, and privilege filters — written to a structured intake.md the demand-draft skill reads. Use when the user wants to prep a demand letter, run intake before drafting, or capture context for a payment demand, breach/cure notice, cease-and-desist, employment separation, or preservation demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agency or freelancer takes on a NEW client and needs everything up front — an 11-section intake covering business overview, audience, current marketing, goals, budget, timeline, brand assets, approval process, and success criteria, written for the client to fill in and return. Trigger on 'client intake', 'agency brief', 'onboard a new client', 'discovery call template', 'what should I ask a new client', 'kickoff questionnaire'. Also use when the user just signed someone and does not know where to begin. Not for — the internal context file the skills read, see `product-marketing-context-global`; the plan built from the answers, see `00-marketing-plan-global`; briefing an outside vendor, see `67-agency-vendor-brief-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Methods for assessing what people actually eat — 24-hour recall, food frequency questionnaires, diet diaries, biomarkers, duplicate-plate studies, and controlled feeding. Covers the relative strengths and biases of each instrument, how to choose among them for a given question, and how to interpret results in the presence of measurement error. Use when a user wants to estimate population-level intake, individual-level intake, or evaluate the plausibility of a dietary claim that depends on how intake was measured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage the Gaia issue backlog and skill-batch intake queue. Use this skill when someone asks to: "triage issues", "clean up the issue tracker", "review the backlog", "close stale issues", "process the intake queue", "review skill-batches", "evaluate draft skill proposals", "approve or reject pending skills", "is this issue still valid?", "what's clogging the backlog?", "run a triage pass", or /gaia-triage. Covers two workstreams: (1) GitHub issue lifecycle — identifying resolved, stale, or need-more-info issues and acting on them via gh CLI; (2) skill-batch intake — evaluating draft proposals in registry-for-review/skill-batches/ and routing them toward promotion or rejection. This is the gatekeeping step before new skills enter the canonical registry; and (3) a cross-repo triage sweep — sizing, P0-P4 prioritization, umbrella/epic synthesis, and assignment across every gaia-research org repo, on the one headquarters tracker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a Workflow Phase 1 intake document capturing a new request — the problem, the desired outcome, constraints, and testable acceptance criteria. Use when a user brings a new feature, change, or investigation that doesn't yet have a spec. The output lives at `docs/intake/<slug>.md` and feeds `/scout`, `/research`, and `/spec` downstream.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

非エンジニアからスキル要件を引き出したいとき、intake.md と Notion ページを manifest 駆動で生成したいときに使う。

intake 成果物を Notion へ初回公開したいとき、ヒアリングをやり直さず Notion 側だけ更新して再公開したいときに使う。

ユーザーが言語化できない「何を入力し、何をどう出力してほしいか」を深掘って intent_contract と 5 軸ヒアリングシートを再現性高く埋めたいとき、run-skill-intake から phase 4 として呼ばれて sheet.md/sheet.json/interview.json を生成したいときに使う。

既存 intake に追加要望を Claude Code チャット内で対話聞き取りしたいとき、Gate R 承認後に Notion ページを PATCH 上書きしたいときに使う。

進行中のskill intakeのphaseと5軸を確認したいとき、visualとNotion公開状態をread-onlyで確認したいときに使う。