473 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Investigate a GitHub issue by fetching details, analyzing the codebase, researching documentation, and presenting an actionable implementation plan with test guidance. Use when asked to investigate, analyze, triage, or plan work for a GitHub issue. Invoked with /investigate-issue <ISSUE_ID> or /investigate-issue (prompts for ID).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Node.jsの処理を途中で止め、変数や実行経路を調べるスキル。非同期処理の停止、不安定なテスト、メモリ増加、CPU負荷の原因調査に使えます。
Runs an evidence-based investigation of a bug, failure, or unexpected behavior with investigate and publishes the resulting investigation report to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants something debugged, diagnosed, or root-caused AND the findings posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not investigate to a local file only — use investigate. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user says "minimize this ty ecosystem change", "reproduce this ecosystem result", "investigate a primer difference", "investigate a mypy_primer difference", "investigate a mypy-primer difference", or asks to reproduce, investigate, or minimize behavior changes in ty ecosystem/primer/mypy_primer/mypy-primer projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHubの公開ソフトウェアに不正な変更がないか、履歴やアーカイブを照合して調査します。削除された情報の回収を試み、侵害の手がかりと根拠付きの報告書をまとめます。
Systematically investigate bugs, test failures, build errors, performance issues, or unexpected behavior by cycling through characterize-isolate-hypothesize-test steps. Use when the user asks to "investigate this bug", "debug this", "figure out why this fails", "find the root cause", "why is this broken", "troubleshoot this", "diagnose the issue", "what's causing this error", "look into this failure", "why is this test failing", or "track down this bug".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal — for Boundless team members only. Cross-reference Boundless indexer API data, broker telemetry, and service logs to investigate production and staging operational issues. Use when the user wants to understand why slashings happened on prod/staging, diagnose prover or service failures in deployed environments, correlate market events with broker behavior, investigate fulfillment rate drops, look at prover/service logs, or perform any analysis that requires combining on-chain indexer data with off-chain broker telemetry and CloudWatch logs. Also use when the user asks to "investigate", "diagnose", or "find root cause" for prover, service, or market issues on live networks. Do NOT use for debugging local code changes, reviewing PRs, or investigating issues in the codebase itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate merkle root mismatch alerts between relayer and validators. Use when alerts mention "merkle root mismatch", "checkpoint root does not match canonical root", or when asked to debug relayer merkle tree issues for a chain. This skill only investigates - use /fix-merkle-root-mismatch to apply fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate an alert, page, or production symptom in an incident channel or a team's oncall / monitoring channel, and report findings a human can verify. Ordinary conversation and chatter are not alerts; leave those alone. Use when an alert or page lands, when error rate, latency or saturation is up, when someone asks "why is X broken", "investigate", "what changed", "root cause this", pastes a monitor, dashboard, trace or error-tracker link, or reports production trouble; also by default when an alert lands in a covered channel unasked. Feed-level asks land here too ("which alerts matter", "triage today's alerts"), plus the scheduled alert-review routine and the ticket path ("customer X can't check out"). Runs a fast first pass posted as a short interim update with a TL;DR, every finding carrying the query or link to verify it, then proposes the fix and — with connector access and confirmation — carries it out, never unattended. Afterwards `incident-postmortem` writes it up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Mileva Method (CRISP) — Phase 3: Investigate. Process mapping for existing or greenfield processes, user journey mapping, UX discovery, project goals, system architecture (integration map + data flow). Use after outcome alignment. Triggers on "investigate", "phase 3", "map the process", "process mapping", "user journey", "as-is process", or after Phase R exit checklist is complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Produces a diagnostic report; mk:fix owns remediation and mk:build-fix owns compile/build failures. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively suggest when the user reports errors, unexpected behavior, or is troubleshooting why something stopped working. NOT for applying fixes without investigation (see mk:fix); NOT for step-by-step evidence-based reasoning (see mk:sequential-thinking).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub Actions の CI 失敗を調査するスキル。失敗した run / PR / job の URL（例: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/actions/runs/RUNID、…/pull/PR、…/job/JOBID）や run_id・PR 番号を貼られて「このCIが失敗している、原因を調査して」「ビルド/テストがコケた、なぜ落ちたか調べて」「workflow が failed、修正案を出して」「job のログを見て」と頼まれたら必ず使う。WebFetch では github.com のログは取れない（PreToolUse hook が差し戻し、HTML しか返らない）ため、gh（`gh run view --log-failed` / `gh run view --job` / `gh pr checks` / `gh api`）で失敗ジョブ・ステップと失敗ステップのログだけを決定論スクリプトで収集し、失敗原因を特定して修正案を提示する。GitHub Actions 以外（GitLab CI 等）や、URL がログではなくソース閲覧目的のときは対象外。GitHub(gh) 前提。`/gh-ci-investigate` で明示起動も可。
Investigate errors, incidents, or product ideas using both internet research and repo-wide codebase research, then propose a concrete changeset plan with clarifying questions before any implementation. Use when a user asks to investigate, root-cause, or plan changes, or when an Issue or PR is referenced and needs a plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT debug directly) when the user reports errors, 500 errors, stack traces, unexpected behavior, "it was working yesterday", or is troubleshooting why something stopped working. (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
status:investigated な issue の調査結果コメントを読み、実装可能なら status:ready に昇格させる
status:needs-investigation な issue を並列調査し、結果をコメントして status:investigated に更新する
OpenClawのテスト中に起きるメモリ増加や不足を調べます。測定結果やメモリ内の記録を比較し、実際の解放漏れとテスト実行側の保持を見分け、修正を検証します。
OpenClawのCIで処理待ちや実行環境の不足を調べ、ランナー登録数・並列実行数・ジョブの分割や配置を、計測結果に基づいて調整するスキル。
OpenClawの管理画面でセッションや画面配置を整理し、ダッシュボードを作るスキル。接続先の確認や、遠隔公開時の表示・通信不具合の調査も扱います。
公式文書・ソースコード・仕様などの一次資料で疑問を調べ、各主張の出典を添えた調査メモをMarkdownにまとめてリポジトリへ保存するスキル。
ネットワーク間で経路を交換するBGPの接続断や経路不足を、接続状態・到達性・経路の制御設定から調べ、設定を変えずに診断材料を集めるスキル。
Kubernetesの設定ファイル作成・レビューと障害調査を支援します。稼働確認、権限、リソース制限、自動スケールの設定例と調査コマンドを参照できます。
ECC ToolsのGitHub Appで起きるPRの過剰作成や利用上限の抜け、高額モデルの意図しない使用をコードから追い、費用増加の原因と修正を検証するスキル。
Use when asked to debug, fix a bug, investigate an error, or do root cause analysis, and when users report errors, stack traces, unexpected behavior, or say something stopped working.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。