「justification」の検索結果

Translate technical security work into the language of non-security audiences — board, executives, engineering, customer success, customers, legal, procurement, sales. Covers incident communication, post-mortem narrative, audit-findings-for-stakeholders, risk justification, security spend justification, and customer-facing breach disclosure. Use when the user mentions 'security comms,' 'communicate this finding,' 'explain to my boss,' 'board update,' 'executive summary,' 'incident communication,' 'breach notification,' 'customer disclosure,' 'security memo,' 'post-mortem narrative,' 'risk justification,' 'why this matters to the business,' 'translate this finding,' 'stakeholder update,' or has technical security work that needs to land with a non-security audience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upload one Kleros-ecosystem file per paid request to IPFS through the Kleros x402 gateway for $0.01 USDC on Base mainnet. Use for dispute evidence, MetaEvidence JSON, court/dispute/arbitrator policies, Curate item metadata, juror justifications, or any artifact a Kleros contract or subgraph will reference by CID. Trigger when the request mentions Kleros, court, arbitrator, dispute, juror, Curate, Proof of Humanity, evidence, meta-evidence, justification, explicitly names this gateway or skill, or asks to test or validate it. Do NOT use for generic IPFS/CID requests without Kleros context; recommend a general-purpose pinning service. Each request accepts exactly one file: different bytes require separate paid uploads, while identical bytes should reuse one CID.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use grant budget justification for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a single security finding — from a scanner, audit, advisory, or report — to a defensible disposition with a mitigation plan, false-positive justification, or accepted-risk writeup. Use when the user mentions 'triage this finding,' 'is this a real vulnerability,' 'mitigation plan,' 'false positive,' 'accept this risk,' 'compensating controls,' 'risk justification,' 'security ticket,' 'CVSS this,' 'should we fix this,' 'disposition,' 'sign off on,' or has a single security finding and needs to decide what to do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning how many patients or cases a study needs before data collection (power analysis, IRB justification). Walks a decision tree to the right test and returns reproducible R/Python code and IRB-ready justification text. Analyzing collected data is /analyze-stats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Building defensible grant budgets — personnel, equipment, indirect costs, and justifications reviewers believe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Penetration test and red team report writing methodology. Covers executive summary structuring (risk-led narrative for non-technical readers), technical finding format (title, severity, affected scope, narrative, reproduction steps, impact, remediation, references), CVSS v3.1 / v4.0 scoring with vector justification, OWASP risk rating, evidence hygiene (redacting credentials, hashing client data, time-stamping every action), screenshot and PoC artifact management, finding chain narratives, scope/limitations/assumptions documentation, retest evidence and remediation tracking, deliverable formats (PDF, DOCX, HTML, JSON for SIEM ingestion), client-customer-deliverable separation, and common report mistakes (over-CVSSing, undermining the triager, missing the 'so what'). Use at the end of an engagement when authoring a deliverable, when restructuring a draft for executive readability, or when establishing a reusable report template for a consulting practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect a ChatGPT Apps MCP server codebase and generate chatgpt-app-submission.json with app info suggestions, tool hint justifications, test cases, and negative test cases, then report review-check findings and outputSchema warnings for submission review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply plugin knowledge base updates to an existing generated system. Consults the Ars Contexta research graph for methodology improvements, proposes skill upgrades with research justification. Never auto-implements. Triggers on "/upgrade", "upgrade skills", "check for improvements", "update methodology".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research-backed evolution advice for your knowledge system. Analyzes health reports, friction patterns, and derivation history to propose specific changes with research justification. Never auto-implements — proposals require your approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户明确要求“写/生成 NSFC 预算说明书”“写预算说明”“生成 budget.tex / budget.pdf”“写国自然预算 justification”时使用。基于用户标书正文或补充材料，输出一份可提交的预算说明书 LaTeX 项目并渲染 `budget.pdf`。若用户未指定工作目录，必须暂停并先要求其指定。⚠️ 不适用：用户只是想了解预算原则；用户仅要预算表数字而不写说明书；或用户是 2026 青年 A/B/C 默认包干制且无需预算说明书的场景。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户要求写作、重构、审查或润色 NSFC/科研基金申请书的立项依据、研究意义、国内外现状、科学问题或科学假设时使用。以语义论证和可核验性为核心，支持任意文件名、标题命令和 LaTeX 结构；默认全自动完成诊断、成稿、校正、备份和写入，不向用户发起中途确认或审核问题。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate professional prior authorization request letters for insurance companies with proper clinical justification and formatting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft IACUC protocol applications with focus on the 3Rs principles justification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares multiple study-route options for the same biomedical research question and recommends one primary plan, while explicitly explaining why alternative routes are secondary, premature, weaker, or dependency-heavy. Always use this skill when the user already has a reasonably defined question but is unsure which main study route should anchor the project. Focus on plan comparison, route selection, dependency awareness, and primary-plan justification rather than full protocol drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and deliver a raise request that actually works — the evidence, the number, the timing, and the exact words — instead of hoping it gets noticed. Use when asked how do I ask for a raise, I deserve more money, prepare me to ask for a raise, or negotiate a pay increase at my job. Produces a value case built on your actual contributions and market rate, a specific target number with justification, the right timing and person, a script for the conversation, and responses to the likely pushbacks — turning 'I want more' into a business case your manager can say yes to.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when strengthening ACM CCS reproducibility evidence, including the artifact-availability posture, threat-model-to-evidence mapping, attack reproduction steps, defense overhead measurement, measurement-dataset provenance, environment and version pinning, and honest justification when artifacts cannot be shared.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimates the minimum biological replicates (or cells/events) for a target power at a target FDR in genomics experiments using ssizeRNA, PROPER, powsimR for scRNA-seq, and pilot-data dispersion estimation from DESeq2/edgeR. Covers the biological-versus-technical replication distinction (technical replicates do not add degrees of freedom for biological inference), replicate-number-versus-sequencing-depth budgeting, scRNA-seq sample-versus-cell allocation under a pseudobulk model, and the critique that "n=3" is a publication convention rather than a power calculation. Use when budgeting a sequencing experiment, writing the sample-size justification in a grant, estimating replicates from pilot data, allocating a fixed budget between samples and depth, or planning scRNA-seq cohort size. For clinical-trial sample size see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the power-given-n direction see experimental-design/power-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantifies biodiversity from species abundance/incidence tables using Hill numbers (iNEXT) with coverage-based rarefaction-extrapolation (Chao & Jost 2012), asymptotic richness via Chao1/ACE/jackknife as a lower bound, Baselga turnover/nestedness partition with the Podani alternative as sensitivity check, mandatory Hellinger transformation before ordination (Legendre & Gallagher 2001), Faith PD and SES_MPD/SES_MNTD with explicit null-model choice, and Maire 2015 functional-diversity dimensionality optimization. Use when comparing diversity across sites with unequal sampling effort, picking the right richness estimator for singleton-heavy amplicon data, partitioning beta diversity into turnover vs nestedness, reporting Hill-number effective species counts rather than raw entropies, computing SES_MPD with explicit null-model justification, or deciding whether to apply standard metrics to compositional amplicon data. Not for clinical 16S microbiome diversity (see microbiome/diversity-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize a Power BI or Analysis Services semantic model end to end so it is ready for report authors, Excel users and Copilot - table groups, display folders, Title Case business names and naming conventions, hierarchies, sort-by columns, hiding, Analyze in Excel (IsAvailableInMDX), descriptions, format strings, data categories, context annotations, DAX formatting and UDFs, calculated-object justification, duplicate removal, perspectives, translations and security roles. Use whenever the user asks to "organize", "tidy", "clean up", "polish", "prepare", "standardize" or "make report-ready" a model or one table in it (for example "organize the date table"), to "fix naming conventions", "rename fields", "make names human readable" or "fix abbreviations", even when they name only one of these aspects, and whenever a model is driven through the Tabular Editor 3 MCP or the te CLI for that purpose. Not for DAX performance tuning (dax skill) or model design and star-schema changes (semantic-model skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits existing table permissions on a Power Pages site by analyzing them against site code and Dataverse metadata, then GRADES the configuration with deterministic 1–5 scores across 3 security/usability/correctness categories (9 dimensions). Detection is anchored by a recurring-issue catalog so findings and severities stay consistent run-to-run. Generates an HTML report with an at-a-glance verdict and per-category scores in the Overview plus a single list of **major/minor** issues (each major issue labelled permissions-only or upstream-caused with a short justification), and suggested fixes. Use when the user wants to review, verify, check, score, or grade table permissions for security issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop a business case for an initiative using costs, benefits, risks and evidence. Use when a sponsor needs budget or timeline justification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope management for legal matters — baseline capture, in-flight change control, OOS documentation, and scope retrospective. Use when asked to review scoping assumptions, assess whether work is in or out of scope, draft a scope change notice, track scope changes, prepare an OOS justification, run an OOS report, prepare a scope call agenda, or review what changed on a matter. Trigger on: 'scope change', 'out of scope', 'OOS', 'scope creep', 'is this in scope', 'the client wants us to also', 'additional work', 'scope review', 'what changed from the original scope', 'we need to revisit the quote', 'the budget assumed', 'OOS report', 'scope call with the client', 'run a scope report'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 3 of the prd-taskmaster pipeline: smart mode selection and user handoff. Detects installed capabilities (superpowers, ralph-loop, task-master-ai, playwright, research providers), recommends ONE execution mode (A/B/C) with reasoned justification, appends the task-execution workflow to CLAUDE.md, surfaces a structured AskUserQuestion multi-option picker for user agency, and dispatches the chosen mode. Mode D (Atlas Fleet) is selectable only when detect_capabilities returns tier=premium (licensed atlas-launcher detected); otherwise it is a locked Atlas Pro teaser. Plan Mode is NOT used (spec section 13.5): AskUserQuestion is the sole user-agency mechanism. Declares HANDOFF complete so EXECUTE can follow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。