「line-by-line」の検索結果

Deep Context Builder Skill (Ultra-Granular Pure Context Mode) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Enables ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability or bug finding and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep Context Builder Skill (Ultra-Granular Pure Context Mode) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Enables ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability or bug finding and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enables ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability or bug finding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A 1970s European editorial poster in motion — a red rule draws across, a giant tilted figure drops in, a three-line headline rises line-by-line, an italic serif standfirst fades.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 把这段黑话翻译成人话, 这句话到底什么意思, 帮我把周报去黑话, 用大厂黑话改写这段, 互联网黑话词典, 对齐抓手闭环是什么意思, or translate Chinese internet-company jargon (互联网黑话) into plain words and back. Produces a line-by-line translation of 黑话 into plain Chinese with what each sentence actually commits to (who, what, by when), a rewrite at the chosen tone (白话, 得体职场, or 满分大厂味 parody), a 40-plus term glossary with plain meanings, and a 周报去黑话 mode that turns a jargon-heavy weekly report into one a reader can act on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decode an auto repair estimate — what each line actually is, which items are urgent vs upsell, and the questions that separate a fair shop from a fishing expedition. Use when someone asks 'is this repair quote fair', 'decode my mechanic's estimate', 'do I really need all this', or 'is the shop ripping me off'. Produces a line-by-line decode with urgency triage, parts/labor sanity checks, ranked red flags, and the exact questions to ask the shop before authorizing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render a 'mosaic-grid-reveal' video from a config — a real-DOM FULL-BLEED N×N mosaic of real product tiles that pops in one tile at a time (scatter order, ease-out-back overshoot), the grid clears, then the brand wordmark builds line-by-line followed by a sub-label, tagline, and CTA; frame-stepped via Playwright and encoded with FFmpeg — deterministic assembly, FREE (the music bed comes from create-music-elevenlabs), so the wordmark, tile captions, and CTA stay pixel-crisp. Use for the mosaic-grid-reveal format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-first development — surround the implementation with an executable spec and a gauntlet of constraints (tests, types, coverage, mutation) so line-by-line review becomes optional. Use when the user explicitly asks for high-assurance or evidence-first work ("reliable", "TDD", "prove it works", "I won't read the code"), or when the change touches high-stakes domains (money, auth, data loss, concurrency, public API). For routine changes where the user just wants normal tests, write good tests directly instead of invoking this loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Line-by-line copy editing and improvement for marketing content. Polish existing copy for clarity, conciseness, impact, and conversion. Trigger phrases: "edit my copy", "improve this copy", "polish this text", "copy edit", "make this clearer", "tighten this up", "proofread", "review my copy", "make this more persuasive", "fix my writing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when reviewing or editing copy to ensure adherence to Every's style guide. It provides a systematic line-by-line review process for grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and style guide compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enables ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability or bug finding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enables ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability or bug finding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive code simulation engine that spawns ghost personas to review your code before it ships. Each ghost walks through your code line-by-line from a different failure perspective: The Adversary (race conditions, double-submit, idempotency), The Enterprise Edge (business logic gaps, multi-currency, B2B tax exemptions, locale), Chaos Monkey (timeouts, partial failures, network partitions, OOM). Produces a chaos timeline, structured bug report with severity ratings, and three resolution tiers (quick fix, robust architecture, generated test suite). Use this skill whenever the user mentions code review, PR review, "find bugs", "what could go wrong", "will this break", "is this safe", "stress test", "edge cases", design review, pre-merge check, dry run, chaos test, or wants a second opinion on any code — even if they don't explicitly ask for "ghost personas" or "simulation". Also trigger when someone pastes a code snippet with any question about its correctness or safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply MCAF human-review-planning guidance for a large AI-generated code drop by reading the target area, tracing the natural user and system flows, identifying the riskiest boundaries, and prioritizing the files a human should inspect first. Use when the codebase is too large to review line-by-line and you need a practical review sequence plus a prioritized file list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ultra-granular code analysis for deep architectural context building. Line-by-line and block-by-block analysis using First Principles, 5 Whys, 5 Hows methodology at micro scale. Builds mental models, tracks invariants and assumptions, and maps cross-function call flows for security audit preparation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove telltale AI-writing patterns from README, docs, and user-facing text. Must be done line-by-line, manually. No regex. Use after agents write any user-visible prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI-writing tells from README, docs, and user-facing text. Must be done line-by-line, no regex. Use after agents write any user-visible prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enables ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability or bug finding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enables ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability or bug finding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。