「multi-llm」の検索結果

Convenes a multi-LLM expert panel to pressure-test hard-to-reverse decisions. Use when reversibility score is low and adversarial review is warranted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates detailed, sectionized implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review. Use when planning features that need thorough pre-implementation analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a configurable multi-LLM council with personas, budget caps, synthesis, veto gates, and optional implementation handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing native or multi-LLM handling for init, review, or security requests

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-agnostic multi-LLM deliberation. Three phases — independent responses, cross-model anonymized ranking, chairman synthesis. Credentials come from explicit plugin configuration or pro-workflow-specific CLI variables. Persists transcript to a wiki page when --wiki <slug> is passed. Use when the user wants multiple AI perspectives, consensus-building, or the "LLM Council" approach for high-stakes reviews, plan critique, or contested learning rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates detailed, sectionized implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review. Use when planning features that need thorough pre-implementation analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-LLM collaborative brainstorming and planning. Use when user explicitly requests consultation with multiple AI models (ChatGPT, Gemini, other LLMs) before presenting an implementation plan, or asks to "consult the council", "ask other models", or "get perspectives from other AIs". Queries external LLM APIs, synthesizes their perspectives, and presents an adapted implementation plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured idea generation + multi-LLM debate for the product-owner stage. Diverge (generate genuinely different bets), debate (a 4-persona panel on 4 models argues over 2 rounds), converge (synthesize a recommendation). Used by product-owner before architect; available to architect for design-space exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end research workflow skill for investment analysts and policy researchers. Three scope modes the user picks at trigger time — light (4-5 page decision memo, ~15 min, 0 charts), medium (12-15 page topic brief, ~1 h, 6-10 charts), heavy (flagship report 30-40 pages / 15k+ words, ~2-3 h, 25-35+ charts, multi-stage workflow, multi-LLM, PDF + Word + WeChat + HTML derivations). Reports default to English; the AI replies in the user's chat language. Battle-tested on real macro/policy/equity reports (e.g. Saudi Vision 2030 deep-dive). Triggers when user types /analyst-research, /flagship-research, or describes needs like "research report", "topic analysis", "investment research", "做研报", "投研报告", "主题分析", "深度分析", "policy assessment", "industry deep-dive". Not for: pure news commentary (use topic-brief), slide decks (use deckster-slide-generator), one-shot Q&A.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate multi-LLM parallel debate and synthesis. Dispatches prompts to available omega CLI wrappers in parallel, collects independent responses, runs anonymized peer review ranking, and synthesizes via a chairman model. Supports collaboration templates, idle watchdog, inter-agent messaging, worktree isolation, and multi-turn sessions. No server required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates detailed, sectionized implementation plans through research, stakeholder interviews, and multi-LLM review. Use when planning features that need thorough pre-implementation analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-LLM adversarial consensus loop — 3+ LLMs compete to find flaws in designs/specs until unanimous agreement is reached

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cria planos de implementação detalhados e segmentados através de pesquisa, entrevistas com stakeholders e revisão multi-LLM. Use quando planejar features que precisam de análise pré-implementação aprofundada.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。