「n-tier」の検索結果

Assists in designing and implementing secure n-tier serverless web applications and microservices on Google Cloud. Use when users need architecture designs, security checklists, Terraform code, or deployment guidance for multi-tier serverless apps, regional data residency / European sovereignty compliance, zero-trust private VPC networking, or Private Service Connect. Don't use for VM, GKE, or non-Google Cloud architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies layered n-tier architecture with enforced boundaries. Use when designing moderate systems needing clear presentation, domain, and persistence layers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in designing and implementing secure n-tier serverless web applications and microservices on Google Cloud. Use when users need architecture designs, security checklists, Terraform code, or deployment guidance for multi-tier serverless apps, regional data residency / European sovereignty compliance, zero-trust private VPC networking, or Private Service Connect. Don't use for VM, GKE, or non-Google Cloud architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build a preference center", "set up a frequency opt-down ladder", "give people a step-down instead of unsubscribe", or "design a topic/cadence preference page"; produces a preference-center field spec, a frequency/topic opt-down ladder (down-tier paths that substitute for a hard unsubscribe), a preference-to-suppression mapping, and a SEND N-dimension sub-item note on preference-center / frequency options offered. Not for the lifecycle flow map or cadence governance — use email-sequence-designer; not for the consent/suppression record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing EQS or ruling the N1 unsubscribe veto — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件偏好中心/降频阶梯设计/退订替代降档

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run fable-mode execution discipline on Claude Fable 5.1 — the top of the escalation ladder and the strongest staged run available. Routes the task to the @fable-orchestrator agent with its model overridden to Fable (`model: "fable"`), which stages the work, delegates artifact production to @fable-worker-sonnet / @fable-worker-haiku, and cold-checks deliverables with @fable-verifier. Trigger when the user explicitly asks for thorough/systematic/"deep work" handling on the strongest model ("fable on fable", "stage this on fable", "deep work mode, fable", "run this on 5.1"), or when a fable-opus run reports the task exceeds Opus's ceiling. Benchmarked 2026-09-02: zero correctness delta on Fable 5.1 at ~1.1× tokens, ~2× wall — a provenance runner, not an accuracy runner. Do NOT use for ordinary single-pass tasks — prefer fable-opus, fable-sonnet, or fable-haiku when the task doesn't need peak reasoning. Fable is plan-included; bulk work still routes down-tier.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-funnel paid advertising operations for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for PPC strategy, Google Ads optimization, LinkedIn Ads, social media advertising, programmatic buying, creative strategy, attribution modeling, budget allocation, budget pacing and planned-vs-delivered reconciliation, audience overlap and campaign self-competition audits, suppression lists, ROAS improvement, media spend optimization, and the media no auction sells — newsletter and podcast sponsorships, community and industry-publication placements, paid review-site listings on G2 and Capterra, and pay-per-lead content syndication. It also covers buying on the AI answer surface — ads inside Google AI Overviews and AI Mode that existing Search, Shopping and Performance Max campaigns already serve into with no opt-out, no placement targeting and no segmented reporting, and ChatGPT Ads and Microsoft Copilot as separate opt-in platforms with their own plan-tier reach limits, no negative keywords, and a landing-page crawler gate. It also owns the conversion signal the bidding algorithms learn from — CRM pipeline stages (SQL, opportunity, closed-won) sent back to Google Ads, LinkedIn, Meta and Microsoft Ads through offline conversion import, enhanced conversions for leads, the Google Data Manager API and the LinkedIn Conversions API, with click-ID capture, stage values, dedupe, EEA consent signals and retractions. It also gates connected TV (CTV) and streaming video for B2B — whether a reach medium belongs in the plan, how a vendor ties a TV household to a target account (member data, IP-to-account graph or contextual), the server-side ad insertion (SSAI) fraud questions, Programmatic Guaranteed deals, and a holdout lift test because CTV has no click. It also runs person-led paid social — LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads and Meta partnership ads that put spend behind an employee's or creator's post — on a paid-usage term, an in-post disclosure check and an end-date register, because the platform approval carries no term. Also triggers on: CTV, connected TV, OTT, streaming TV ads, should we run CTV, LinkedIn CTV, B2B CTV, account-based CTV, SSAI fraud, thought leader ads, boost an employee's post, sponsor a creator's post, partnership ads, whitelisting, creator usage rights, PPC, Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, social ads, programmatic, ad creative, attribution, media budget, paid campaigns, ROAS, CPA, ad spend, newsletter sponsorship, podcast sponsorship, community sponsorship, sponsor a newsletter, content syndication, pay-per-lead, cost per lead vendor, media kit, rate card, insertion order, direct buy, publisher partnership, make-good, G2 paid listing, Capterra ads, review site advertising, sponsorship ROI, budget pacing, we underspent our budget, are our campaigns competing with each other, audience overlap, self-competition, campaign cannibalization, suppression list, exclusion list, ad frequency across channels, how many ad accounts do we have, ads in AI Overviews, AI Mode ads, ChatGPT Ads, OpenAI Ads Manager, Copilot ads, conversational ads, should we advertise on ChatGPT, can we buy our way into the AI answer, our ads are showing in AI Overviews and we cannot report on it, context hints, OAI-AdsBot, our ad landing page fails review, robots.txt is blocking our ads, our paid leads are junk, Google Ads is optimizing for the wrong leads, offline conversion import, OCI, enhanced conversions for leads, send CRM stages back to Google Ads, upload SQLs to LinkedIn, LinkedIn Conversions API, LinkedIn CAPI, Meta conversion leads, CRM to ad platform, gclid, li_fat_id, msclkid, value-based bidding, optimize for pipeline not form fills, low match rate, conversion lag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Documenting As-Is and To-Be business processes for a Salesforce project as swim-lane diagrams — one lane per actor, explicit decision points, parallel and exception/sad paths, and per-step automation-tier annotations that drive downstream build decisions. Trigger keywords: As-Is To-Be salesforce process, swim lane salesforce, business process map, automation candidate identification, sad path documentation, process actor mapping, manual residue. NOT for Opportunity stage and exit-criteria design — use admin/sales-process-mapping. NOT for picking Flow vs Apex for one requirement — use admin/process-automation-selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Domain-aware complexity routing. Scans task description for domain keywords, matches against domain-complexity.csv, returns complexity level, workflow intensity, and execution tier. Extends Phase 0 orchestration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build a preference center", "set up a frequency opt-down ladder", "give people a step-down instead of unsubscribe", or "design a topic/cadence preference page"; produces a preference-center field spec, a frequency/topic opt-down ladder (down-tier paths that substitute for a hard unsubscribe), a preference-to-suppression mapping, and a SEND N-dimension sub-item note on preference-center / frequency options offered. Not for the lifecycle flow map or cadence governance — use email-sequence-designer; not for the consent/suppression record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing EQS or ruling the N1 unsubscribe veto — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件偏好中心/降频阶梯设计/退订替代降档

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Layered Architecture knowledge base. Provides patterns, antipatterns, and PHP-specific guidelines for traditional N-tier/Layered Architecture audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。