本文へ移動
cccskills

「naturalist」の検索結果

14 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

observe

無料

Sustained neutral pattern recognition across systems without urgency or intervention. Maps naturalist field study methodology to AI reasoning: framing the observation target, witnessing with sustained attention, recording patterns, categorizing findings, generating hypotheses, and archiving a pattern library for future reference. Use when a system's behavior is unclear and action would be premature, when debugging an unknown root cause, when a codebase change needs its effects witnessed before further changes, or when auditing own reasoning patterns for biases or recurring errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pjt222/agent-almanac372026年10月12日 更新

Record insect sightings with location, date, habitat, photography, behavior notes, preliminary identification, and citizen science submission. Covers GPS coordinates, weather conditions, microhabitat description, macro photography techniques, behavioral observations, preliminary identification to order using body plan, and submission to citizen science platforms such as iNaturalist. Use when encountering an insect you want to document, contributing to citizen science biodiversity databases, building a personal observation journal, or supporting ecological surveys with georeferenced photographic records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pjt222/agent-almanac372026年10月12日 更新

Naturalistic decision-making research showing how experts make decisions through recognition-primed processes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Think and work like an expert Entomologist. Use when a task calls for Entomologist judgment. Reasons from tagmata, Comstock-Needham venation, and tarsal formula through trap-guild sampling (Malaise, pitfall, pan, light), host–parasitoid ecology, ICZN vouchers and genitalia keys, BOLD/GBIF/COL/iNaturalist triage, IUCN invertebrate caveats, CITES/COSE permits, Taylor/GLMM on the correct EU, and EIL/ET with IRAC MoA rotation while treating teneral, dimorphic, and cryptic mis-IDs as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agents2052026年10月3日 更新

ecologist

無料

Think and work like an expert Ecologist. Use when a task calls for Ecologist judgment. Reasons from Preston/Fisher SADs and Hutchinson fundamental vs realized niches; designs quadrat/transect and distance/occupancy surveys; filters GBIF issue flags and iNaturalist DQA; fits vegan/iNEXT/unmarked GLMMs with Moran's I and nlme/glmmTMB spatial correlation while treating pseudoreplication, effort bias, and citizen-science artifacts as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agents2052026年10月3日 更新

license: Apache-2.0 NOT for unrelated tasks outside this domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Apply recognition-primed decision making to agents operating under time pressure, uncertainty, and ambiguous cues. Use for situation assessment, RPD-style action selection, and decision-support design in operational settings. NOT for batch optimization, static planning with full information, or tasks where exhaustive search is cheap and harmless.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Apply recognition-primed decision making to agents operating under time pressure, uncertainty, and ambiguous cues. Use for situation assessment, RPD-style action selection, and decision-support design in operational settings. NOT for batch optimization, static planning with full information, or tasks where exhaustive search is cheap and harmless.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Apply recognition-primed decision making to agents operating under time pressure, uncertainty, and ambiguous cues. Use for situation assessment, RPD-style action selection, and decision-support design in operational settings. NOT for batch optimization, static planning with full information, or tasks where exhaustive search is cheap and harmless.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新