「redline」の検索結果

An annotated / redline lo-fi wireframe — a desktop landing/marketing page drawn as flat greyboxes inside a browser chrome frame, overlaid with numbered annotation pins (①②③④⑤) in a single accent color, paired with a right-hand SPEC PANEL that lists each numbered pin with a short engineering / UX note. This is the "wireframe + redline spec" style — clean, flat, low-fidelity, NOT hand-drawn. Use when the brief asks for "annotated wireframe", "redline wireframe", "wireframe with spec", "lo-fi landing wireframe", "low fidelity", "线框图", "标注线框", or "redline".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a specific inbound deal before close — when sales has asked for a discount that exceeds AE authority, when the customer has redlined the MSA, when per-deal economics (margin after discount, multi-year payment shape, indemnity exposure) need to be quantified, or when discount approval needs to be routed to a named human approver (Sales Director, VP Sales, CFO, CRO, General Counsel). Covers deal review, discount approval routing, per-deal margin scoring, deal exception handling, MSA redline triage, contract landmine detection (uncapped indemnity, MFN, perpetual license-back, missing DPA), and named-approver chain assembly. NEVER auto-approves — every output is a numeric scorecard plus a routing recommendation to a named human.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a contract and generates redline suggestions with replacement language. Identifies unfavorable terms, missing protections, ambiguous language, liability exposure, IP risks, termination traps, and auto-renewal gotchas. Produces a contract-review.md with clause-by-clause analysis, risk ratings, tracked changes format, and negotiation talking points. Use when the user wants redline markup, contract markup, or suggested contract edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a contract against your organization's negotiation playbook — flag deviations, generate redlines, provide business impact analysis. Use when reviewing vendor or customer agreements, when you need clause-by-clause analysis against standard positions, or when preparing a negotiation strategy with prioritized redlines and fallback positions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast first-pass NDA review for {{nda_label}}. Saves a new inbound NDA into {{nda_folder}}, checks it clause-by-clause against our standard NDA positions, drafts redlines on what deviates, and drafts a flag summary for counsel — holding every redline and flag for counsel's sign-off. Never signs or sends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-pass contract review for {{contracts_folder}}. Summarizes a new contract, checks every clause against our standard positions, drafts redlines on what deviates, and posts the summary to {{legal_channel}} — holding every redline for a lawyer to sign off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Business contract, NDA, or policy with legal risk: surface contract and compliance risks, questions, and escalation points before a legal decision or action. Use when the user says: contract review, contract liability clause, regulatory analysis, compliance review, contract redline, redline the contract, negotiation preparation, negotiation strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A comprehensive auditor for any agent skill — including Manus, OpenClaw/ClawHub, Claude, LobeHub, or custom SKILL.md-based skills. Use this skill whenever a user wants to evaluate, audit, review, score, or quality-check an agent skill before publishing, updating, or deploying. Covers two hard veto gates (structural redlines + research integrity redlines), static quality scoring across 25 criteria (ISO 25010 + OpenSSF + Agent), dynamic test input generation, multi-mode execution testing, multi-layer output evaluation with five specialized category rubrics (Evidence Insight / Protocol Design / Data Analysis / Academic Writing / Other), a Research Veto that applies to all four research categories, human eval viewer generation, actionable P0/P1/P2 optimization recommendations, and automatic skill improvement that outputs a polished, production-ready SKILL.md. Also use whenever a user says "audit my skill", "evaluate my skill", "improve my skill", or wants a corrected version after evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Für Redline Kommentar AGB: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Für Legal Note Redline Output: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Contract review assistant analyzing agreements against playbooks. GREEN/YELLOW/RED severity. Use when reviewing vendor contracts, SaaS agreements, service agreements, or generating redline suggestions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep clause-by-clause NDA review from Recipient or Discloser perspective. Produces issue log with redlines, fallbacks, rationales, owners, deadlines. Use when reviewing NDAs for negotiation or approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT REVIEW — reviewing an existing agreement for risk, deviations from standard, missing protections, and internal contradictions, and proposing redlines. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 legal benchmarks. Contract review is a COMPOSITE skill (extraction + reasoning + redlining + conflict-detection), so this routes by the dominant sub-task. Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/ language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model to review this contract / NDA / MSA", "best AI to redline", "route this contract review", or is about to review an agreement without a fixed model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read, edit, redline, comment on, and create Microsoft Word .docx files. Use to fill out or edit a Word doc, redline a contract with tracked changes, add/resolve comments, replace text keeping its formatting, restyle headings/fonts, edit tables, or read/extract a .docx as Markdown or text. Also BUILD a new .docx — from Markdown or programmatically (code that outputs a Word report with headings, tables, images). Not for PDF, Google Docs, Excel, PowerPoint, or .doc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and redline a contract — flag risk, missing clauses, one-sided terms. Use when asked to "review this contract", "redline this agreement", or "is this contract risky".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A crisp greybox / blueprint lo-fi wireframe — neutral grey blocks on a pale page, image placeholders drawn as a rectangle with a diagonal X, text shown as solid "lorem bars" of varying widths, sharp 1.5–2px borders, and a single monospace redline accent for annotations. Reads like a structural blueprint before any visual design is applied. Use when the brief asks for "greybox", "blueprint wireframe", "lo-fi dashboard", "low fidelity", "线框图", or "灰盒原型".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx) and Word templates (.dotx). Use whenever a build task's artifact kind is document with the default docx output, or the task mentions a Word doc, .docx, or .dotx, extracts or reorganizes content from one, inserts or replaces images, does find-and-replace in one, or works with tracked changes (redlines) or comments. Covers python-docx generation, raw OOXML editing of existing files, document structure and formatting, and render verification. Not for PDFs, spreadsheets, or Google Docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read, create, or edit Microsoft Word .docx files — extract/summarize text and tables, generate reports/letters/memos with headings, tables, images, TOC and page numbers, do find-and-replace, or apply tracked changes (redlines) and comments. Use whenever the user has a .docx or wants a Word deliverable. Not for PDF, .xlsx, .pptx, or Google Docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a publication-grade 8-part deep-dive series on a single company (~120k words total): cognitive reset / moat / profit engine / hidden assets / era variable (e.g. AI) / financials Buffett-style / management / valuation+redlines. The core IP is NOT writing but REVISING — a strict fact-check checklist catches pseudo-precision (probability-weighted expectations, third-party MAU discrepancies, linear extrapolation), absolute language, and cross-article number inconsistencies that most finance long-forms violate. Each piece stands alone but shares one valuation/management/price framework. Use when the user wants textbook-level depth on one company for public publishing (a single research report or earnings note is NOT this — use investment-research / earnings-review instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight NDA, MSA, and vendor contract review for SMBs without legal on staff. Reads contracts from local files, mail attachments (Gmail or M365), a connected file store (Google Drive or M365), or DocuSign envelopes; flags non-standard terms; explains risks in plain English; and outputs a marked-up redline as a separate DOCX. Use when the user says "review this contract," "what am I signing," "red flags," "flag any concerns," "check the payment terms," or uploads/forwards a contract or legal agreement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an RFP, RFI, RFQ, security questionnaire, vendor questionnaire, or proposal request arrives and the team needs a structured response — parsing multi-section buyer-dictated requirements (MANDATORY vs WEIGHTED vs NICE-TO-HAVE), building a Shipley-method proof-point matrix mapping each requirement to a verifiable proof point, articulating 3-5 win-themes that ladder up across requirements, and producing a Shipley-derived winrate estimate that informs a bid / no-bid / partner-bid recommendation. For Bid Managers, Proposal Leads, Directors of Sales, and Sales Engineers at the response-strategy moment. Surfaces GAP requirements explicitly — never invents claims. NOT free-form proposal narrative authoring, NOT contract redline, NOT marketing collateral.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference: review of an inbound vendor agreement against the team playbook in `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/commercial-legal/CLAUDE.md`. Flags deviations, assesses risk, generates specific redline language, and routes to the right approver. Loaded by /commercial-legal:review when a vendor MSA, services agreement, or similar is detected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when users ask for a hand-drawn or illustrated image prompt, name one of the repository's 20 numbered styles or the 3.1 stable variant, or mention triggers such as 亲子手绘、家庭蜡笔画、蜡笔、吉卜力、水墨、像素、淡彩速写、动画概念、水粉、北欧绘本、纸雕、软胶潮玩、墨线绘本、暖色扁平绘本、圆头红线、暖黄墨线、family-crayon-card、warm-flat-storybook、roundhead-redline、warm-yellow-ink-story. Produces prompt text or a formal reference-bearing call bundle and does not generate images.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, read, edit, review, redline, comment on, merge, audit, render, and verify .docx Word documents, including layout-sensitive and OOXML-level work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。