Bugcrowd-specific reporting tactics complementing report-writing: VRT category search-and-fallback strategy when no exact match exists, manual severity override when VRT defaults underrate impact, severity-request paragraph as first body section, OOS-clause rebuttal templates (rate limiting on auth-flow endpoints, debug-info framing, user-enumeration with sensitive PII, theoretical-issue counter), chained-finding cross-reference patterns, target selection for QA-vs-prod programs, researcher-side hygiene (Bugcrowdninja email alias, account state restoration, friendly-tester posture). Use when filing a Bugcrowd submission, when VRT default seems wrong, when triager closes as OOS or downgrades severity, when chaining linked submissions, or when scope distinguishes production from QA. Pairs with report-writing and triage-validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter☆ 5,0702026年10月12日 更新
Prevent common AI report pitfalls — bug blending, inflated threat models, and generic language. Train Claude with your best past reports for concise, technical submissions. Based on Critical Thinking Bug Bounty Podcast Episode 166.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge☆ 242026年7月11日 更新
Bug bounty report writing for H1/Bugcrowd/Intigriti/Immunefi — report templates, human tone guidelines, impact-first writing, CVSS 3.1 scoring, title formula, impact statement formula, severity decision guide, downgrade counters, pre-submit checklist. Use after validating a finding and before submitting. Never use "could potentially" — prove it or don't report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
awarexone/Agentic-Bug-Hunter☆ 5,3342026年10月10日 更新
Bug bounty report writing for H1/Bugcrowd/Intigriti/Immunefi — report templates, human tone guidelines, impact-first writing, CVSS 3.1 scoring, title formula, impact statement formula, severity decision guide, downgrade counters, pre-submit checklist. Validation gates and the submittability/always-rejected decision are owned by triage-validation; this skill owns the written report itself (templates, tone, formulas). Use after validating a finding and before submitting. Never use "could potentially" — prove it or don't report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter☆ 5,0702026年10月12日 更新
Evidence-capture and PoC-redaction discipline for bug-bounty submissions: cookie redaction protocol (which fields to mask, Preview annotation / Burp panel hiding / DevTools workflow), PII black-bar discipline (what to mask in other-user data — names, emails, phones, faces — vs what is safe to leave — usernames, trace IDs, request bodies), HAR file sanitization (jq filters for Cookie/Set-Cookie/Authorization headers), Burp Repeater/Intruder screenshot hygiene (hide request body, show only Results table for rate-limit attacks), Chrome DevTools Console PoC patterns (credentials include so cookies are not echoed, labeled console.log), screenshot capture order, filename conventions, post-submission rotation hygiene. Use BEFORE any PoC screenshot, BEFORE attaching a HAR, or whenever preparing evidence with session cookies or other-user PII. Pairs with bugcrowd-reporting and report-writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter☆ 5,0702026年10月12日 更新
Guidelines for writing well-structured, cited research reports
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
vstorm-co/pydantic-deepagents☆ 1,0862026年10月6日 更新
Guides privacy audit report writing including executive summary drafting, findings classification (critical, high, medium, low), evidence referencing, root cause analysis documentation, recommendation formulation, management response tracking, and report distribution protocols. Covers report structure from scope definition through appendices and sign-off. Keywords: audit report, findings documentation, executive summary, recommendations, report structure, privacy audit deliverables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills☆ 3032026年3月17日 更新
Use when any case fails or you reject a criterion - what goes in the review_criterion note, the failed case and the numbered need_revision comment, with severity
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
makifbaysal/tasktrooper☆ 1122026年10月12日 更新
Generates structured cyber threat intelligence reports at strategic, operational, and tactical levels tailored to specific audiences including executives, security operations teams, and technical analysts. Use when producing finished intelligence products from raw collection data, creating sector threat briefings, or delivering post-incident intelligence assessments. Activates for requests involving CTI report writing, threat briefings, intelligence products, finished intelligence, or executive security reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
galyarderlabs/galyarder-framework☆ 252026年10月11日 更新
Bug bounty report writing for H1/Bugcrowd/Intigriti/Immunefi — report templates, human tone guidelines, impact-first writing, CVSS 3.1 scoring, title formula, impact statement formula, severity decision guide, downgrade counters, pre-submit checklist. Validation gates and the submittability/always-rejected decision are owned by triage-validation; this skill owns the written report itself (templates, tone, formulas). Use after validating a finding and before submitting. Never use 'could potentially' — prove it or don't report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新
Companion to the generic report-writing skill. Use when working specifically on Bugcrowd submissions where VRT mapping, OOS-clause rebuttals, or per-program target selection matter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新