「rfp」の検索結果

RFP creation, distribution, evaluation, and shortlisting for in-house legal teams selecting outside counsel. Draft a new legal services RFP from scratch, evaluate firm responses against weighted criteria, produce a shortlist recommendation with selection rationale for GC sign-off, or design the end-to-end RFP process from scratch. Trigger on: 'draft an RFP', 'run an RFP process', 'evaluate firm responses', 'score the RFP submissions', 'which firms should we shortlist', 'selection recommendation', 'how do we run a panel RFP', 'RFP for legal services', 'pitch process', 'firm selection process', 'compare the proposals', 'we're reviewing our panel', 'panel refresh RFP', 'we need to go to market', 'request for proposal', 'evaluate the pitches', 'which firm won the RFP', 'write a legal RFP', 'RFP evaluation criteria', 'design the RFP process', 'how do we weight the criteria'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts answers to the questions in a received RFP, RFQ or tender from the organisation's past responses, answer library, case studies, policies and other documents provided: one row per buyer question with a draft answer marked Reused, Adapted or Missing, its source and date, and a legal or pricing review flag on every answer touching terms, liability, warranties, insurance, data protection or price. Use when the user asks to "draft our RFP response", "answer this tender from our past proposals", "pre-fill the bid questions", "first pass at the RFQ answers" or "reuse our previous bid content". Do not use for writing the buyer's own RFP or requirements, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for security or due diligence questionnaires use vendor-security-questionnaire-prefill; for scoring received supplier responses use rfp-comparison-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, approving, or designing commercial motion — pricing models, deal review, discount approval, partnership economics, channel mix, commercial policy, RFP/RFI response, bookings forecast. Triggers on "review this deal", "should we discount", "pricing model", "partner economics", "RFP response", "bookings forecast", "channel mix". Forks context to route to one of seven Commercial sub-skills (pricing-strategist, deal-desk, partnerships-architect, channel-economics, commercial-policy, rfp-responder, commercial-forecaster) and returns a digest. Distinct from business-growth (sales execution) and c-level-advisor/cro-advisor (strategic CRO judgment).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fresh-session RFP and proposal-questionnaire response for {{projectName}}. Parses a new inbound RFP from {{rfp_label}} in Gmail and its attached document in Google Drive, matches each question to our vetted past-answers library and product docs, drafts the full response in a new Google Doc inside {{drafts_folder}}, flags anything it can't answer confidently, and leaves an unsent Gmail draft linking it — holding the completed response for a human to review and submit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Génération de sujets d'entraînement complets pour l'épreuve de NOTE DE SYNTHÈSE (5 heures, coefficient 3) de l'examen d'accès au CRFPA : choix du sujet, dossier documentaire de 16 à 20 documents assemblé à partir de sources réelles vérifiées (textes, jurisprudence, travaux parlementaires, doctrine) avec contrôle du verbatim, puis grille de notation au modèle de la Commission nationale (résumé de chaque document, problématique, thèmes cotés sur 20, plan). Livraison en deux fichiers .docx distincts, le sujet et la grille. Si l'utilisateur n'impose pas de sujet, en chercher un dans l'actualité juridique. Mode aveugle pour l'étudiant qui compose sans rien voir du corrigé. Déclencher dès que l'utilisateur demande un sujet de note de synthèse, un dossier documentaire, une note de synthèse blanche, un entraînement à l'épreuve de 5 heures du CRFPA ou de l'IEJ, ou une grille de note de synthèse. NE PAS déclencher pour les épreuves de 3 heures (sujet-crfpa-toutes-matieres) ni pour la correction de copies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a business need and its constraints into a DRAFT RFP requirements pack: traced functional and non-functional requirements with priorities, mandatory gates, evaluation criteria with weights left to the business owner, and fact-seeking supplier questions. Solution-neutral; never names a supplier or product. Use when the user asks to "write the RFP requirements", "turn this business case into tender requirements", "draft the supplier questionnaire", "structure our RFQ from this brief" or "set up evaluation criteria before we go to market". Do not use for responses already received, use rfp-comparison-pack to compare them or supplier-evaluation-matrix to score them instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

運送会社の選定、運賃交渉、入札、実績評価、貨物の割り当てを支援します。米国の輸送実務を基に、費用・配送品質・輸送力を踏まえた契約や更新の判断を整理します。

• 新しい運送会社の審査
• 輸送業務の入札準備
• 運賃や燃料割増を交渉したいとき

Use when an RFP, RFI, RFQ, security questionnaire, vendor questionnaire, or proposal request arrives and the team needs a structured response — parsing multi-section buyer-dictated requirements (MANDATORY vs WEIGHTED vs NICE-TO-HAVE), building a Shipley-method proof-point matrix mapping each requirement to a verifiable proof point, articulating 3-5 win-themes that ladder up across requirements, and producing a Shipley-derived winrate estimate that informs a bid / no-bid / partner-bid recommendation. For Bid Managers, Proposal Leads, Directors of Sales, and Sales Engineers at the response-strategy moment. Surfaces GAP requirements explicitly — never invents claims. NOT free-form proposal narrative authoring, NOT contract redline, NOT marketing collateral.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns whatever came out of a discovery conversation — a call transcript, a voice memo, jobsite photos, an RFP document, a set of drawings, or scrappy notes — into a branded, costed proposal, estimate, or statement of work built on the owner's own templates and historical pricing. Routes it for signature and triggers the deposit invoice once it's accepted. Works entirely from uploaded files when no connector is available, producing DOCX and PDF the owner can send themselves. Use this whenever a quote, bid, estimate, proposal, or SOW is the deliverable — including phrasings like "write this up for them," "put together a quote," "I need to bid this job," "turn my notes into a proposal," "respond to this RFP," or "price this out." Reach for it when the owner describes a job they just looked at, even without saying the word quote.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds grant and solicitation opportunities the organization actually qualifies for, runs a hard go/no-go before anyone starts writing, drafts the application or response from past submissions and real program data, and tracks every deadline and reporting obligation that follows an award. Built for nonprofits, government contractors, and education, and it filters daily feeds like SAM.gov or DIBBS down to the handful worth bidding. Runs on Google Drive or M365 with DocuSign and Calendar deepening it, and works from uploaded past submissions plus web research when nothing is connected. Use this whenever a funding or bidding opportunity is in play — including "find grants we qualify for," "should we bid this," "draft the response to this RFP," "we've got 50 solicitations to filter," "what's due on the federal grant," or "help me write the proposal narrative."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Router/index for the 4 business & growth skills bundled in this plugin: customer-success-manager (health scoring, churn risk, expansion), sales-engineer (RFP analysis, competitive matrices, PoC planning), revenue-operations (pipeline, forecast accuracy, GTM efficiency), and contract-and-proposal-writer. Use when a growth/revenue request doesn't obviously match one skill and you need to pick the right one (e.g., 'which accounts are at risk', 'should we bid on this RFP').

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when user asks to "build a Solana dapp", "write an Anchor program", "create a token", "debug Solana errors", "set up wallet connection", "test my Solana program", "deploy to devnet", or "explain Solana concepts" (rent, accounts, PDAs, CPIs, etc.). Also use for quick on-chain lookups via public RPC + curl — "what's the balance of <wallet>", "look up transaction <sig>", "token balance for <account>", "check this address on mainnet/devnet". End-to-end Solana development playbook covering wallet connection, Anchor/Pinocchio programs, Codama client generation, Surfpool/LiteSVM/Mollusk testing, security checklists, and JSON-RPC curl lookups against public clusters. Prefers @solana/kit v7 plugin clients (createClient + .use()), wallet connection via @solana/kit-plugin-wallet + @solana/react, web3.js v3 (Kit internals, RC) as the migration target for legacy codebases, and Surfpool for local networks and integration testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RF Toolbox and RF Blockset in MATLAB -- S-parameter I/O, network conversions (S/Z/Y/ABCD/T/H/G, mixed-mode), cascade/de-embedding, rfbudget analysis, circuit composition, matching networks, amplifier stability, mixer spurs, rational fitting, SI channels, baseband processing, Circuit Envelope simulation. Trigger: sparameters, Touchstone, .s2p, .s4p, rfplot, smithplot, rfparam, rfwrite, zparameters, yparameters, abcdparameters, s2sdd, cascadesparams, deembedsparams, rfbudget, noise figure, OIP3, IIP3, amplifier, modulator, nport, rffilter, attenuator, seriesRLC, shuntRLC, lcladder, txline, circuit, setports, clone, matchingnetwork, stabilityk, stabilitymu, powergain, gammams, gammaml, mixerIMT, OpenIF, rational, rationalfit, stepresp, txlineWRLGC, rf.Amplifier, rf.Mixer, rf.Filter, rf.Sparameter, rfsystem, RF Blockset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate, select, and contract with vendors and SaaS tools. Use this skill when comparing alternatives, running an RFP, scoring vendors against criteria, negotiating contracts, planning a switch, or assessing a vendor's risk. Triggers on vendor evaluation, RFP, vendor selection, build vs buy, SaaS evaluation, vendor scorecard, vendor comparison, contract negotiation, vendor switch, procurement. Also triggers when a renewal is coming up or when a tool isn't meeting expectations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a client proposal or RFP response: scope, deliverables, KPIs, pricing tiers. "respond to this RFP"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

>Ce skill génère des sujets d'entraînement pour les deux épreuves écrites de consultation du CRFPA : l'épreuve de droit des obligations (tronc commun) et l'épreuve de spécialité (civil, affaires, social, pénal, administratif, international et européen, fiscal). Chaque sujet est accompagné d'une grille de notation détaillée sur 20 points. Vous ciblez un thème précis, ou vous laissez le skill procéder à un tirage au sort couvrant l'ensemble du programme. Connexion aux MCP OpenLegi et GoodLegal requise : toutes les références d'articles et d'arrêts sont vérifiées sur les sources officielles, sans citation inventée

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn an RFP and a folder of your past proposals, case studies, and capability docs into a requirement-by-requirement compliance matrix and a drafted response. Flags disqualifiers and unanswerable requirements before you burn a week writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

분석팀 에이전트. 입찰 제안서(RFP) 또는 마케팅 제안서(마케팅 플랜) 분석. PDF 분석 또는 사용자 브리핑 수집. 프로젝트 메타데이터, Pain Point, 평가기준 배점, 프로젝트 유형을 추출합니다. 트리거: RFP 분석, 제안요청서 분석, PDF 분석, Pain Point, 평가기준, 마케팅 분석, 마케팅 플랜

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RFP(제안요청서) 분석 및 입찰 제안서 자동 생성 (PPTX / HTML+Figma). 사용자가 "제안서", "제안요청서", "RFP", "입찰", "PPTX 생성", "slide_kit", "테스트 폴더", "제안서 만들어", "제안서 제작", "proposal", "HTML 제안서", "Figma 제안서" 등을 언급할 때 활성화.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write structured Requests for Proposal (RFP) or Requests for Quotation (RFQ) aligned with ISO 20400 sustainable procurement principles. Cover scope, technical requirements, evaluation methodology, and commercial terms. Use when sourcing vendors, services, or equipment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire or the AI annex buyers now attach to it, executing sales sequences, coaching qualification, or deciding what the website's AI chat agent is allowed to say. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, reply handling, reply classification, out-of-office replies, auto-replies counted as replies, our reply rate is inflated, prospect replied remove me, opt-out by reply, is this list ready to send, launch readiness, CRM segment outbound, we emailed a current customer, outbound hit an open opportunity, ownerless leads, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, AI security questionnaire, AI annex, AI vendor due diligence, the buyer is asking if we train on their data, do you train on customer data, which model do you use, model provider sub-processor, AI subprocessor disclosure, where does inference run, can the customer turn the AI feature off, AI-CAIQ, CSA AI Controls Matrix, ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Article 50, are we a provider or a deployer, AI feature disclosure, our model vendor changed and nobody told the buyer, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss, website chatbot, chat widget, AI chat agent, AI SDR, inbound AI SDR, conversational marketing, live chat, what should our chatbot be allowed to say, our chatbot quoted the wrong price, the bot promised a discount, do we have to disclose it is AI, EU AI Act chatbot disclosure, chatbot handoff to sales, chat transcript review, prompt injection on our chatbot, Drift, Qualified, Intercom.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-fills a customer's or prospect's security or third-party risk questionnaire from the organisation's own answer sources (prior questionnaires, answer library, policies), returning one row per question with a draft answer marked Reused, Adapted, Missing or Routed, its source, date, scope match and owner, plus the Missing list by owner. Never invents an answer, certification or control and never submits. Use when the user asks to "pre-fill this security questionnaire", "take a first pass at the customer's due diligence form", "answer this vendor assessment from our previous responses", "populate the third-party risk questionnaire" or "which questions can we reuse answers for". Do not use for screening a vendor's own answers, use vendor-risk-screening-brief instead; for RFP or tender answers use rfp-response-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT proposal skeleton from a discovery summary (call notes, discovery brief, CRM record, emails) and the organisation's own proposal template: every template section in order, pre-filled only where the discovery material supports it with the source beside each line, and every section still needing a human input marked HUMAN INPUT with the owner role and the question to answer. Use when the user asks to "start the proposal for <prospect>", "build the proposal skeleton from the discovery notes", "pre-fill our proposal template", "what do we already have for the proposal" or "first cut of the proposal". Do not use for answering a formal RFP, RFQ or tender question set, use rfp-response-drafter instead; for turning a priced estimate into a statement of work use estimate-to-sow. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。