341 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Evaluates distressed debt opportunities with recovery analysis, liquidity assessment, and potential restructuring outcomes. Use when screening distressed situations, analyzing stressed credits, or evaluating workout scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
/em:stress-test — Business assumption stress testing. Use before betting on a plan whose core assumptions are unvalidated — e.g. stress-testing 'enterprise buyers will tolerate a 6-month pilot' or a hockey-stick revenue model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenClaw全体の品質検証を継続し、不具合の再現から根本原因の修正、レビュー、反映確認まで進めます。実環境や負荷の検証結果を、再開可能な報告書に記録します。
Use when evaluating David Tepper-style distressed macro opportunities: crisis assets, policy backstops, capital structure, bank/credit stress, and asymmetric recovery trades.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end finite element analysis in MATLAB PDE Toolbox — geometry creation, model setup, solve, and post-processing in one skill. Use when building geometry from primitives or file import, setting up femodel with BCs/loads/materials, solving thermal/structural/EM problems, and extracting or visualizing results. Covers fegeometry, multicuboid, multicylinder, multisphere, decsg, boolean ops, mesh generation, femodel, all AnalysisTypes (thermalSteady, thermalTransient, structuralStatic, structuralTransient, structuralModal, structuralFrequency, electrostatic, magnetostatic, dcConduction, harmonic EM), materialProperties, faceBC, faceLoad, cellLoad, vertexLoad, solve, interpolation, von Mises stress, principal stress, reaction forces, heat flux, pdeplot3D visualization. Triggers on: PDE Toolbox, finite element, FEA, thermal analysis, structural analysis, electromagnetic analysis, femodel, mesh, boundary conditions, stress, displacement, heat transfer, post-processing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Walk through a live web app AS a real user to find usability + behavioural bugs that static reviews miss. REQUIRES proof of interaction (typing, clicking, sending, observing) before any verdict — a sweep that didn't interact terminates with verdict 'Incomplete'. Walks threads, exercises every element, runs the multi-pane stress matrix, visual polish sweep, component perfection checklist, automated a11y (axe-core), pragmatic performance budget (LCP/CLS/INP), scenario battery (11 scenarios), and stress recipes including the real-flavour data battery. Hard gates: console errors/warnings = 0, network 5xx = 0, layout collapse = 0, axe Critical/Serious = 0, perf budget green. Audit-the-audit meta-check rejects rushed reports. Each finding has reproduction steps, evidence path, and suspected code location. Trigger with 'ux audit', 'walkthrough', 'qa sweep', 'audit the app', 'dogfood this', 'check all pages', 'find what's broken', 'stress the UI'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable. Produces a multi-page website (default), a single-page interactive site, a Microsoft Word document, a PowerPoint deck, or a LaTeX/PDF. Use whenever a user has a stress-test result, ambiguity audit, or "where will this be litigated" scenarios and wants to publish, present, or share them. Triggers on "publish the audit," "make a report from this," "turn this into a website / deck / brief / Word doc," "make a Netlify site," "build slides of these ambiguities," "render the scenarios," "package this stress test," "produce a LaTeX version," and similar. Pairs with the ambiguity-stress-test skill (the underlying analysis) but works on any structured or semi-structured ambiguity analysis. Visual design is opinionated but the user can override colors, fonts, and brand label. Most formats need Python and a writable filesystem; single-file HTML works where the host has neither.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarially stress-tests a legal text — a contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — for interpretive ambiguity: it finds the seams where the people governed by it will later disagree about what it means and turns each into a concrete dispute scenario with both sides' arguments, the likely outcome, and a fix. Use it whenever someone wants to pressure-test, red-team, audit, or find weak spots, loopholes, gaps, ambiguities, or drafting problems in a legal document; whenever a drafter wants to tighten a contract, statute, regulation, or opinion before it issues; whenever a litigator wants to mine an opinion or contract for arguments; or whenever someone hands over a legal text and asks where it will be fought over or for issue-spotting. Trigger it for contract review, statutory-ambiguity analysis, judicial-opinion scope analysis, and drafting QA — even if the user never says "stress-test" or "ambiguity."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced architecture stress analysis methodology for designing systems that survive unknown stresses. Load when --residuality flag is used or when designing high-uncertainty, mission-critical systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Devil's Advocate stress-testing for code, architecture, PRs, and decisions. Surfaces hidden flaws through structured adversarial analysis with metacognitive depth. Use for high-stakes review, stress-testing choices, or when the user wants problems found deliberately. NOT for routine code review. Triggers on "스트레스 테스트", "stress test", "devil's advocate", "반론", "이거 괜찮아", "문제 없을까", "깊은 리뷰", "critical review", "adversarial".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommends hydrocortisone stress dosing during the active phase of labor for pregnant patients with primary adrenal insufficiency, using a regimen similar to major surgical stress. Trigger phrases: "active phase of labor", "cervix dilation ≥4 cm", "contractions every 5 minutes", "PAI patient in labor".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Educates patients with primary adrenal insufficiency on increasing glucocorticoid dosage during intercurrent illness, fever (≥38°C), or physiological stress, including recognition of precipitating symptoms (e.g., fever, vomiting, trauma) and actions to prevent impending adrenal crisis. Trigger phrases: fever, intercurrent illness, stress, vomiting, inability to tolerate oral meds, need for parenteral glucocorticoid.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Administers 100-mg hydrocortisone IV bolus followed by continuous IV infusion of 200 mg HC per 24 hours (alternatively 50 mg IV every 6 hours) for patients undergoing major surgical stress. Use when managing patient with major surgical stress; triggers include patient undergoing major surgery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suggests adjusting glucocorticoid dose according to severity of illness or magnitude of the stressor in patients with primary adrenal insufficiency. Use when patient with PAI has intercurrent illness, fever, or stress.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-phase dialectical stress-test for HIGH-STAKES decisions only (architecture choices, irreversible product calls, strategic bets). Heavy-cost skill — do NOT use for routine questions, brainstorming, or simple tradeoffs. User must explicitly invoke or describe a decision they call "high-stakes", "irreversible", or "needs stress-testing". Triggers: "stress test this decision", "dialectic on", "challenge this thesis", "should I really".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
計画やアイデアを質問で掘り下げ、決定同士の依存関係を整理します。推奨案を添えた質問を段階的に重ね、曖昧な前提や未決事項を確認して共通理解を築くスキルです。
Refines raw ideas into sharp, actionable concepts through structured divergent and convergent thinking. Use when an idea is still vague, when you need to stress-test assumptions before committing to a plan, or when you want to expand options before converging on one. Triggers on "ideate", "refine this idea", or "stress-test my plan".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieve current shipping market stress from carrier and freight indicators. Use when the user asks whether supply chains or container shipping are under pressure right now.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Risk measurement and stress testing — VaR/CVaR/max drawdown calculation, Monte Carlo simulation, extreme-value tail-risk analysis, and historical scenario stress testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Persistent world-model harness that stress-tests ideas, strategies, and investments against 11 time horizons from 6 months to 50 years, each a deep analysis of geopolitics, tech, economics, society, and security, in Fast/Standard/Deep tiers. USE WHEN threat model, world model, test idea, future analysis, time horizon, stress test against future, long-term risk. NOT FOR single-shot idea attack (use RedTeam).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial analysis deploying parallel expert agents to stress-test ideas, strategies, and plans — decomposes into atomic claims, attacks them, then steelmans and counter-argues, producing severity-ranked findings with remediation. USE WHEN red team, attack idea, counterarguments, critique, stress test, devil's advocate, find weaknesses, break this, poke holes, strongest objection. NOT FOR collaborative debate to find best path (use Council).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Omnigent load test and produce a results file explaining the latencies. Load when the user wants to load-test / stress-test / benchmark Omnigent under concurrency ("load test omnigent", "stress test the server", "how many hosts/sessions/turns can it handle", "load test real agent turns / conversations", "run a load test"). The test makes each simulated user a real omnigent host that creates host-bound sessions and drives real multi-turn conversations with a mocked LLM; it boots its own local stack (dev/loadtest/run.py). Gather inputs, run it, then read the generated summary.md and explain the latency distribution (avg/median/p95/p99, throughput, failures). NOT for single-request latency micro-benchmarks (that is dev/benchmarks/).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-model second opinion from Google Gemini — a different AI reviewing the same changes, with deep Google ecosystem knowledge. Three modes: review (pass/fail gate for Google Ads campaigns, SEO metadata, or code), challenge (adversarial stress-test that tries to break your changes), and consult (open Q&A with Gemini on Google Ads strategy, SEO best practices, or implementation questions). Use when the user says "gemini review", "ask gemini", "gemini challenge", "second opinion from gemini", "consult gemini", "stress test with gemini", "what would gemini say", "cross-model review", or "get another opinion". Voice aliases: "gem", "gemini check". Especially useful for Google Ads changes, SEO metadata updates, campaign structure decisions, keyword strategies, and bid/budget changes — Gemini has native Google ecosystem knowledge that complements Claude's analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; its docs-aware mode covers this variant) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening with living documentation. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan, one question at a time, challenging it against your project's existing domain model and glossary (CONTEXT.md), sharpening fuzzy terms, stress-testing with concrete scenarios, cross-referencing code, and updating CONTEXT.md + ADRs inline as decisions crystallise. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-with-docs-codex", "grill me against the docs then have codex review", "stress-test this against our domain model then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes in a project with established terminology/ADRs and wants alignment, documentation, AND a cross-model sanity check. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-with-docs (MIT). NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。