「technical-documentation」の検索結果

技術文書やエージェント向け指示ファイルを作成・レビューするスキル。READMEや貢献手順も調べ、説明の分かりやすさ、運用上の整合性、多言語版の差分を確認します。

• 技術文書を作成・更新したいとき
• READMEや文書の変更レビュー
• エージェント指示と貢献手順の整備

OpenClawの既存ドキュメントを、仕様や操作の説明をソースで確かめながら再構成し、詳細の移動先やリンク、書式まで検証するスキル。

• 仕様説明を保ちながらページを短くしたいとき
• 詳細仕様を参照ページへ分けたいとき
• 説明を現在のCLIの動作に合わせたいとき

Build and review high-quality technical docs as well as agent instruction files in your repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, write, and improve developer documentation using Google's Developer Documentation Style Guide and Technical Writing courses. Use this skill for any documentation work, even when the user names no style guide: "audit our docs", "review this README", "write a README", "getting started guide", "how-to or tutorial", "API reference", "docstrings", "CLI help text", "changelog or release notes", "migration guide", or "our docs are confusing". Also use it when writing docs from code, rewriting a doc for clarity, fixing headings, procedures, or code samples, or enforcing consistent voice and terminology across a docs set — prefer it over editing documentation unaided. Covers reader and doc-type fit, second person and active voice, procedures, headings, lists and tables, code samples and placeholders, link text, notices, the word list, timeless docs, and accessibility. For code comments and naming, see clean-code. For marketing or landing-page copy, see storybrand-messaging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, review, or audit this repository's technical documentation, including README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, root and scoped AGENTS.md files, docs pages, and documentation drift. Use for source-backed documentation authoring, behavior verification, and cross-surface consistency. Do not use for code review, deslop diff cleanup, or whole-page rewrites, splits, or reorganizations handled by docs-refactor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor a whole documentation page in this repository without losing source-verified behavior facts. Use for page rewrites, splits, reorganizations, or substantial shortening of README sections, docs pages, or instruction files. Do not use for ordinary documentation authoring, targeted corrections, or documentation review; use technical-documentation instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a diff-scoped, behavior-neutral cleanup of AI-generated slop on the current branch before code review. Use for removing trivial comment, defensive-check, type-laundering, redundant-intermediate, compatibility-shim, or local style drift from the branch diff. Do not use for full correctness or safety review, documentation work handled by technical-documentation or docs-refactor, or repo-wide refactors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。