「test writing loop」の検索結果

Testing strategies, patterns, and tools for robotics software. Use this skill when writing unit tests, integration tests, simulation tests, or hardware-in-the-loop tests for robot systems. Trigger whenever the user mentions testing ROS nodes, pytest with ROS, launch_testing, simulation testing, CI/CD for robotics, test fixtures for sensors, mock hardware, deterministic replay, regression testing for robot behaviors, or validating perception/planning/control pipelines. Also covers property-based testing for kinematics, fuzz testing for message handlers, and golden-file testing for trajectories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete operational workflow for implementer agents (Codex, Gemini, etc.) making code changes and writing tests. Defines the Code Change Loop, Test Writing Loop, and Issue Filing process with circuit breakers, severity levels, and escalation rules. Includes bundled scripts for specialist-review (code review) and test-review-request (test audit) that delegate to Claude CLI. Use this skill when starting any implementation task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete operational workflow for implementer agents (Codex, Gemini, etc.) making code changes and writing tests. Drives all work through atomic commits — each loop operates on the smallest complete, reviewable change. Defines the Code Change Loop, Test Writing Loop, Lint Gate, and Issue Filing process with circuit breakers, severity levels, and escalation rules. Requires `committer` for all commits. Includes bundled provider-aware review scripts that keep same-model shell-outs as the last resort, plus a fresh-context Codex fallback for code review and test audit. Use this skill when starting any implementation task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS USE before running .NET tests or answering with a test command or flags. Trigger on "run the tests", "exact dotnet test command", one test/class/category/trait/target framework, combined filters, `--filter-query`, `--no-build`, `--diag`, diagnostic logs, TRX, coverage collection, crash/hang dumps, filter errors, or unrecognized options. Chooses repository-compatible classic, VSTest, bridged MTP, or native MTP syntax for MSTest/xUnit/NUnit/TUnit. DO NOT USE for platform identification alone (platform-detection), writing or debugging test code, interpreting an existing coverage report, CI investigation, migration, or a persistent hot reload/watch loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS USE before running .NET tests or answering with a test command or flags. Trigger on "run the tests", "exact dotnet test command", one test/class/category/trait/target framework, combined filters, `--filter-query`, `--no-build`, `--diag`, diagnostic logs, TRX, coverage collection, crash/hang dumps, filter errors, or unrecognized options. Chooses repository-compatible classic, VSTest, bridged MTP, or native MTP syntax for MSTest/xUnit/NUnit/TUnit. DO NOT USE for platform identification alone (platform-detection), writing or debugging test code, interpreting an existing coverage report, CI investigation, migration, or a persistent hot reload/watch loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a vague bug report into a VERIFIED minimal reproduction and then a failing regression test, agent-driven end to end. Covers extracting the implicit repro from a thin report (env, build, steps, data), the reproduce-minimize-isolate-capture loop, git bisect to find the introducing commit, building a deterministic minimal repro (fixed seeds, frozen time, stubbed network), writing the failing regression test BEFORE the fix (red) and confirming the fix flips it green, and writing repro evidence back into the ticket. Distinguishes flaky-not-reproducible from environment-specific. Use when: "reproduce this bug," "minimal reproduction," "repro steps," "find the commit that broke it," "git bisect," "make the repro deterministic," "write a failing test for this bug," "regression test for a defect," "can't reproduce this bug." Not for: Classifying/deduplicating/severity-routing existing failures without reproducing them — that is ai-bug-triage. Generating tests from specs rather than from a defect — that is ai-test-generation. Related: ai-bug-triage, ai-test-generation, test-reliability, systematic-debugging, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up or recover MTP hot reload for a long-lived console-host edit/re-run loop in a Microsoft Testing Platform project. Use for explicit MTP console requests such as "enable hot reload", "dotnet run to rerun on edit", or unsupported/rude edits. Covers setup, run/watch, restarts, filters, and the VSTest no-mutation fallback. For one-time runs, exact commands, filter errors, TRX/dumps, or merely a failing test, use run-tests. Do not use when Test Explorer or an IDE should rerun tests without an MTP console host. Excludes editor integration, CI, and writing/debugging tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up or recover MTP hot reload for a long-lived console-host edit/re-run loop in a Microsoft Testing Platform project. Use for explicit MTP console requests such as "enable hot reload", "dotnet run to rerun on edit", or unsupported/rude edits. Covers setup, run/watch, restarts, filters, and the VSTest no-mutation fallback. For one-time runs, exact commands, filter errors, TRX/dumps, or merely a failing test, use run-tests. Do not use when Test Explorer or an IDE should rerun tests without an MTP console host. Excludes editor integration, CI, and writing/debugging tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing agent-relay workflows that must fully validate features end-to-end before merging. Covers the 80-to-100 pattern - going beyond "code compiles" to "feature works, tested E2E locally." Includes repair-before-failure validation gates, review-depth fresh-eyes review/fix loops with test hardening, PGlite for in-memory Postgres testing, mock sandbox patterns, test-fix-rerun loops, verify gates after every edit, and the full lifecycle from implementation through passing tests to commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Three modes for CS-conference papers (CVPR/ICCV/ECCV vision, ACL/EMNLP/NAACL NLP, ICLR/NeurIPS/ICML/AAAI ML). DIRECT-EDIT mode (common): the user describes a change in Chinese or English and the manuscript (LaTeX or Markdown) is edited directly through a CS-venue writing toolkit with author sign-off (use for 改这段 / 把中文想法写成 latex / polish / de-AI / translate / compress a passage). REVIEW mode (occasional, pre-submission): harden the paper through an adversarial courtroom review engine (N holistic domain reviewers / contestability routing / two-sided trial / three-way verdict / clerk-converged multi-round loop) with consensus-gated, author-signed revisions (use for review / critique / 审稿 / 评审 / mock-review). AUTO mode (unattended, opt-in via /goal): run the review-revise loop toward a verifiable goal, applying safe fixes under a drift-bounded policy and queueing risky ones. Resolves all inputs at runtime, no hardcoded paths. Not a from-scratch drafter (use ml-paper-writing) and not an official-venue rebuttal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development for behaviour a unit test cannot reach, by writing the expectation against the running app before writing the code. Declare the consequence first, watch it fail, implement, watch it pass. Use when building a user-facing feature, when the user asks for TDD on UI or full-stack work, when a unit test cannot express the outcome that matters, or when you want a red-green loop that runs against the real app instead of mocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The pull request loop for this repo: branch → commit → verify in your own box (local tests + local stack) → PR into main → demo video recorded with agent-browser on the local stack → `gh --attach` → self-merge → verify on dev. A PR into main runs no CI unless a person adds the `test` or `preview` label (one run each). Load when opening, updating, or finishing a pull request; when writing a PR body; when asking what CI runs where; when adding or explaining PR labels or the per-PR preview environment; or when attaching an image or video to a PR, issue, or comment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing a new Spark expression in DataFusion Comet. Walks through cloning latest Spark master to study the canonical implementation, checking the upstream datafusion-spark crate before writing native code, building the Comet serde and Rust wire-up from the contributor guide, then running audit-comet-expression to drive a test-coverage iteration loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Engineering design cycle covering requirements elicitation, specifications writing, constraint identification, iterative prototyping, and design communication. Spans the full loop from problem definition through ideation, analysis, prototyping, testing, and redesign. Includes morphological charts, TRIZ, Pugh matrices, design reviews, and the distinction between functional and non-functional requirements. Use when framing engineering problems, generating design alternatives, writing specifications, or running design reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing asyncio Python code — async/await coroutines, concurrent I/O with asyncio.gather, task creation and cancellation, semaphore rate limiting, producer-consumer queues, async context managers, async generators, WebSocket servers, aiohttp web scraping, async database operations, run_in_executor for blocking calls, or testing async code with pytest-asyncio. Covers FastAPI and aiohttp patterns, synchronization primitives, timeout handling, and common pitfalls like event loop blocking and missing await.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canon TDD for humans and AI agents. Use for production code changes by writing tests first, proving RED, implementing minimal GREEN, and refactoring safely. 2026 edition adds TDP, flakiness gate, ralph-loop integration, memory-search in Step 0, PBT as Step 5.5, mutation testing gate in Step 4, and CJS LSP warning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or editing skills, before deployment, to verify they work under pressure and resist rationalization - applies RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to process documentation by running baseline without skill, writing to address failures, iterating to close loopholes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit an agent's context layout against the four places: system prompt, tools, history, tail. Use when the user asks to audit, review or fix their agent's context, prompt caching, token spend per turn, or CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md layout. Read-only: reports findings and a fix list, changes nothing. Do NOT use for writing evals (evals-bootstrap) or for loop design (goal-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing test fixtures for @copilotkit/aimock — mock LLM responses, tool call sequences, error injection, multi-turn agent loops, embeddings, structured output, sequential responses, or debugging fixture mismatches

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measures whether an automation suite builds release confidence via feedback-loop length, suite reliability, release cadence, and production escape rate, and emits a release_confidence verdict. Use when judging suite value, ROI, or pre-release trust; not for writing or healing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A strict code reviewer, pair programmer, debugger, and mentor for Python, Bash, Google Apps Script, JavaScript, and Swift/Apple platforms. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, planning, or securing code, or for senior-level rigor, a security review, or mentoring. Mode triggers — REVIEW: (critique + refactor), EXPLAIN: (teach), MVP:/PROTOTYPE: (lean-but-safe), DEBUG: (root-cause), AUDIT: (report-first); default is pair-programming. Drives a spec→plan→TDD→verify loop with a deterministic-first, verify-before-asserting (anti-hallucination) discipline. Enforces a security floor (secrets, injection, input validation, isolation, least privilege, authn) and a backup/continuity floor on a phase-aware rigor ladder (Prototype→MVP→Production) — cheap ≠ insecure. Covers testing & fuzzing, SAST/secret-scan/type-check/supply-chain gates, multi-tenant data protection, resilience & DR, scalability, CI/CD, cloud/containers/DBs, and accessible UI — deep references read on demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or changing PyTorch code — model, Dataset/DataLoader, training and evaluation loops, determinism, mixed precision, torch.compile, checkpoints with safetensors, Hugging Face models, ONNX export, and tests that run on CPU

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add Rcpp or RcppArmadillo integration to an R package for high-performance C++ code. Covers setup, writing C++ functions, RcppExports generation, testing compiled code, and debugging. Use when an R function is too slow and profiling confirms a bottleneck, when you need to interface with existing C/C++ libraries, or when implementing algorithms (loops, recursion, linear algebra) that benefit from compiled code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing an LLVM pass plugin, registering it for opt -passes, using DominatorTree or LoopInfo, or testing with FileCheck and lit. Not for reading IR: use llvm-ir-and-passes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。