「test-case」の検索結果

実装差分が plan / todo / test-cases アーティファクトの方針と一致しているかを検査し、逸脱・漏れ・意図外変更を検知する

Author and maintain MANUAL and hybrid test cases and suites in TestRail, Xray (Jira), Zephyr Scale, and Qase. Covers test-case anatomy (title, preconditions, steps, expected results, test data), suite/section organization, bulk authoring from user stories and acceptance criteria, ambiguous-step linting, CSV/API import-export payloads per tool, requirement traceability and coverage gaps, review hygiene, and when a manual case should graduate to automation. Use when: "write a test case," "manual test case," "TestRail case," "Xray test," "Zephyr Scale case," "Qase case," "import CSV into TestRail," "lint these steps," "traceability report," "should this be automated." Not for: Generating automated TEST CODE — that is ai-test-generation. Sprint-level WHAT-to-test selection — that is test-planning. Related: ai-test-generation, test-planning, exploratory-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when designing the human-executable UAT test cases that prove a Salesforce feature works for a specific persona — the per-persona scripts with preconditions, data setup, permission setup, ordered steps, and pass/fail evidence that close out an RTM row. Trigger keywords: UAT test case salesforce, user acceptance test script salesforce, manual test salesforce feature, UAT script per persona, UAT precondition data setup, UAT permission set assignment for testing, negative path UAT case. NOT for high-level UAT planning, defect classification, regression strategy, or sign-off (use admin/uat-and-acceptance-criteria). NOT for the Given/When/Then technique used to write the AC the case is derived from (use admin/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then). NOT for Apex test method generation (use agents/test-class-generator). NOT for test data factory patterns (use templates/apex/tests/TestDataFactory.cls). NOT for performance or load testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when building or maintaining a Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) on a Salesforce project: one row per requirement, columns for source, user-story id(s), test-case id(s), defect id(s), sprint, release, and status. Covers forward traceability (req → story → code → test) and backward traceability (test → req). Trigger keywords: RTM, requirements traceability matrix, audit trail for salesforce delivery, traceability for steerco, deferred requirement tracking, regulatory traceability. NOT for eliciting the requirements in the first place — use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf. NOT for user-story authoring — use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for UAT test design — use admin/uat-test-case-design. NOT for Apex test design — use apex/test-class-standards. NOT for backlog prioritization — use admin/moscow-prioritization-for-sf-backlog. More triggers: traceability.md, build-layer traceability, REQ-XXX and FG-XXX id mapping, artefact-to-requirement orphan report, coverage-gap report, check_rtm.py --manifest-dir, owning run-time agent column, design decision ref column, metadata API name in a traceability row.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update project test-case assets and test reports. Use when Codex is asked to generate test cases in Excel, produce a Word/DOCX test report, summarize automated test execution, turn repository tests into a formal testing artifact, or沉淀/复用 a project testing documentation workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft or refine the test-cases checklist for this card

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ISTQB/JSTQB のテストプロセス各工程の出口ゲートとして、工程成果物（test-plan.md / test-analysis.md / test-design.md / test-case.md / テスト実装 / test-execution-log.md / test-monitoring.md / test-summary-report.md）をレビューするスキル。決定論スクリプトの機械検査（トレーサビリティ ID 突合・テンプレ準拠）と test-reviewer サブエージェントの定性レビューを行い、利用者が通過/条件付き通過/差し戻しを判定して軽量記録 test-review-<工程>.md を残す。上流の仕様・基本設計（spec / design-doc 工程。docs/dev/<対象>/spec.md・basic-design.md）は機械検査と利用者判定のみの軽量ゲートとして扱う。各工程スキル（test-plan〜test-report / feature-spec / basic-design）が完了宣言の前に本スキルの実行を促す。ソースコード diff のレビュー（diff-review）とは別物で、対象はテストプロセスの成果物のみ。成果物の修正・代作はしない。/test-review <テスト対象名> [工程] で明示的に呼び出されたときのみ使用する。

ISTQB/JSTQB のテスト設計（test design）活動を支援するスキル。test-analyze が識別したテスト条件から、テスト対象の特性に応じたテスト技法（同値分割・境界値分析・デシジョンテーブル・状態遷移・カバレッジ基準・エラー推測など）を選定提案し、承認された技法で具体的なテストケース（入力値・前提・期待結果）を導出して、設計書 test-design.md（技法選定根拠・カバレッジ）とケース一覧 test-case.md の 2 本を作る。「テストケースを作って」「テストケースを設計して」「どの技法で網羅すべきか提案して」「境界値/デシジョンテーブルでテストを起こして」と依頼されたときに使う。テストコード実装（test-implement）は対象外。単発のテスト作成依頼（単にユニットテストを書きたいだけ）も対象外。/test-design <テスト対象名> で明示的に呼び出されたときのみ使用する。

pbi-input, plan, todo, test-cases 間の整合性をチェックし、実装着手前の仕様漏れを検知する

TDD を主張する実装の RED/GREEN/REFACTOR VERIFY 証跡（tdd-ledger）の妥当性を検査し、フェーズ順序・exitCode・test-cases との対応の欠落や偽装を検知する

当用户需要编写一个单元测试时，触发该 skill，编写单元测试。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when establishing comprehensive QA testing processes for any software project. Use when creating test strategies, writing test cases following Google Testing Standards, executing test plans, tracking bugs with P0-P4 classification, calculating quality metrics, or generating progress reports. Includes autonomous execution capability via master prompts and complete documentation templates for third-party QA team handoffs. Implements OWASP security testing and achieves 90% coverage targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive test cases including edge cases, stress tests, and counter-examples for algorithm correctness verification. Supports random generation, constraint-based generation, and brute force oracle comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger only when the user explicitly requests live Jira or Zephyr retrieval, existing-link inspection, linking authored test cases, label updates, or stale-link audits. Do not trigger for analysis-only prompts such as 'Analyze the acceptance criteria for TICK-4521', supplied acceptance criteria, test-case authoring, or AC-to-test generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Zephyr test cases from Jira stories: parse acceptance criteria and business rules, impact-analyze existing TCs (update vs. create new), and draft correctly named test cases. Use for AC-to-test generation; defer post-generation Jira linking and manual test-case quality review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or review manual Zephyr test cases with 1-condition-per-TC granularity, Module_Action on Screen when Condition naming, platform prefix rules, and High/Normal/Low priority classification. Use for test-case authoring and review; defer Jira traceability, linking, and pushing cases to Zephyr.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically reduces bug-triggering test cases to minimal form while preserving the failure. Use when debugging with large, complex test cases that need simplification, reproducing bugs with minimal examples, or creating regression tests from verbose failure scenarios. Takes a failing test and systematically removes unnecessary inputs, steps, assertions, and code using delta debugging and other reduction algorithms. Supports unit tests, integration tests, input files, and multiple programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Java, C/C++).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive test case documentation from test code, test framework output, existing test docs, and source code context. Use when documenting test suites, creating test specifications, generating test coverage reports, onboarding developers to testing practices, or preparing QA documentation. Analyzes test functions (pytest, unittest) to extract test names, docstrings, assertions, and organization, then produces structured markdown with both overview-level summaries and detailed test case specifications including purpose, preconditions, steps, expected results, and test data. Triggers when users ask to document tests, generate test specifications, create test reports, summarize test coverage, or explain what tests do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and run manual tests of the project's running app. Runs a session in one of five modes: exploratory, verification, smoke, assessment (UX, localization, accessibility, improvement review), or AI probe. Also writes a manual test plan that holds only what automated tests cannot judge. Use whenever the user asks, in any language, for something to be tested by hand or for a manual test plan — "manual test", "exploratory test", "bug hunt", "verify the bug fix", "smoke test", "QA this screen", "review this screen's UX", "what would you improve", "check the localized copy", "test the AI agent's answers", "write manual test cases", "kịch bản test manual" — or assigns a test design, test plan or test-case IDs to execute by hand. Not for writing automated tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

设计测试用例时使用。适用于功能测试、回归测试、UAT 前用例准备。融合等价类、边界值、决策表、状态转换、错误推测五大黑盒方法。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when writing acceptance criteria for Salesforce features, structuring UAT test scripts from user stories, classifying defects found during UAT, or planning regression testing before a Salesforce release. Trigger keywords: UAT, user acceptance testing, test script, acceptance criteria, defect classification, regression testing, test plan, test case. NOT for Given/When/Then AC syntax — use admin/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then. NOT for the per-case field schema and AC-to-case decomposition — use admin/uat-test-case-design. NOT for automated Flow or Apex test coverage — use flow/flow-testing. Also covers: UAT plan record, sandbox selection for UAT, pre-UAT environment checklist, sandbox email deliverability for testers, test-user personas, negative and bulk coverage, defect triage categories, go/no-go sign-off, quick-deploy window.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when authoring INVEST-compliant Salesforce user stories from gathered requirements: shaping the As-A/I-Want/So-That stem, writing Given-When-Then acceptance criteria, sizing complexity (S/M/L/XL), splitting stories that are too large for a sprint, and emitting handoff metadata that names the next downstream agent. Trigger keywords: user story, INVEST, story splitting, story sizing, As-A I-Want So-That, story handoff, recommended_agents, backlog item shape. NOT for requirements elicitation or stakeholder interviews (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). NOT for the Given-When-Then technique itself in depth (use admin/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then). NOT for UAT test case design (use admin/uat-test-case-design). NOT for backlog prioritization (use admin/moscow-prioritization-for-sf-backlog).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when writing test-first, behavior-driven acceptance criteria in Given/When/Then format for a Salesforce user story. Covers happy path, edge cases, negative paths, permission boundaries, and data-state preconditions so the AC block can drive UAT scripts and Apex test design downstream. Trigger keywords: given when then, gherkin, behavior driven AC, test first acceptance criteria, scenario outline, BDD acceptance criteria. NOT for the user-story format itself (use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce). NOT for UAT script writing (use admin/uat-test-case-design). NOT for Apex test method generation (use agents/test-class-generator). NOT for high-level UAT planning (use admin/uat-and-acceptance-criteria). More triggers: acceptance criteria record, ac_id, req_id on a criterion, artefact under test, negative case for a rule-type requirement, no-match fall-through criterion, oracle for a Then clause, test type apex flow manual, criteria linter, check_ac_format.py, --manifest-dir.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use BEFORE writing any test — enumerate cases per behavior (happy / boundary / error / abuse), prioritize by likelihood × impact, cross-check via subagent — even if the user just says 'add tests'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。