57 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Deep need-clarification skill. Use only when the user explicitly invokes $task-clarifier. Once activated, keep asking until all three goals are met: the user fully understands their own needs, the AI fully understands the user's needs, and the user confirms the AI's understanding is correct. Do not intervene in task execution unless explicitly invoked.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
antigravity-skill-orchestrator workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs A meta-skill that understands task requirements, dynamically selects appropriate skills, tracks successful skill combinations using agent-memory-mcp, and prevents skill overuse for simple tasks and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
antigravity-skill-orchestrator workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs A meta-skill that understands task requirements, dynamically selects appropriate skills, tracks successful skill combinations using agent-memory-mcp, and prevents skill overuse for simple tasks and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Confirms patient understands that continuous glucose monitoring complements but does not replace self-monitoring of blood glucose. Triggers include: 'Clarify CGM role alongside fingersticks', 'Ensure patient knows CGM does not eliminate need for SMBG'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
画像の内容を質問したり、説明文を作ったりするために、LLaVAの導入と利用を支援します。画像を見ながら続ける対話や、画像付き文書の理解にも使えるスキルです。
Lazy senior dev mode: the smallest change that fully solves the task, and a reply a busy human understands in one read. Use on any coding task (writing, fixing, refactoring, reviewing, choosing dependencies) and when the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "simplest solution", "yagni", or complains about over-engineering or bloat. Levels: lite, full (default), ultra.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lazy senior dev mode for any coding task: the smallest change that fully solves it, and a reply a busy human understands in one read.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design consultation: understands your product, researches the landscape, proposes a complete design system (aesthetic, typography, color, layout, spacing, motion), and generates font+color preview... (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert memory architect. Understands your application, identifies where memory adds value, and produces an implementation plan with bank config, tag schema, and code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A meta-skill that understands task requirements, dynamically selects appropriate skills, tracks successful skill combinations using agent-memory-mcp, and prevents skill overuse for simple tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Two-tier memory system that makes Claude a true workplace collaborator. Decodes shorthand, acronyms, nicknames, and internal language so Claude understands requests like a colleague would. CLAUDE.md for working memory, memory/ directory for the full knowledge base.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-pass deep code review for large patches (1000+ LOC) that maximizes real bug detection. Orchestrates targeted-review, shallow-review, and deep-review in parallel across all HIGH and MEDIUM risk files and commits: understands the feature holistically, splits by file and commit, runs deep review on every HIGH/MEDIUM file, targeted review across the same scope, and per-commit shallow review, followed by cross-cut consistency checks. Use when: reviewing a large patch (feature branch, multi-commit, or single large diff, 1000+ LOC), doing a thorough pre-merge review, or when shallower reviews miss bugs due to patch size. Triggers on: "review this branch", "review these commits", "review this feature", "mega review", "thorough review", "full review of X commits", or when the user specifies a commit range or feature for review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Findings-driven targeted code review. Understands the patch via patch-explainer and surrounding code via codebase-analysis, then consults a catalog of bug patterns (~11 categories under references/categories/). Picks only categories whose diff-signals match the patch and items whose "look for" hints match actual code shapes, groups them by review focus (function/file/feature), and spawns parallel subagents — each with a tight scope and selective checklist. Use for medium-to-large patches (50-1000 LOC) as a focused alternative to whole-patch ensemble or whole-file deep review. Triggers on: "review this patch/diff/change", "find bugs in this change", "scoped review", "what could go wrong here", "review using findings", or proactive PR review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) to document significant architectural choices and their rationale for future team members. Use when the user says "write an ADR", "document this decision", "record why we chose X", "add an architecture decision record", "create an ADR for", or wants to capture the reasoning behind a technical choice so the team understands it later. Do NOT use when the decision hasn't been made yet (use create-rfc instead), for implementation planning (use technical-design-doc-creator), or for general documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Owns brand, demand generation, content, communications, and how the market understands what the business does. Use this to set marketing strategy, allocate budget across channels, decide positioning and messaging, judge whether a campaign is worth running, diagnose why demand has stalled, or arbitrate between brand-building and short-term acquisition. Also use to decide which marketing work to stop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the `how` and `why` skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the `how` and `why` skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when articulating what an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript contributes — converting findings into a claim that changes how the field understands accounting's social, organizational, behavioral or institutional operation. Frames the payoff; it does not produce new analysis (aos-data-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lazy senior dev mode: the smallest change that fully solves the task, and a reply a busy human understands in one read. Use on any coding task (writing, fixing, refactoring, reviewing, choosing dependencies) and when the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "simplest solution", "yagni", or complains about over-engineering or bloat. Levels: lite, full (default), ultra.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A meta-skill that understands task requirements, dynamically selects appropriate skills, tracks successful skill combinations using agent-memory-mcp, and prevents skill overuse for simple tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Two-tier memory system that makes Claude a true workplace collaborator. Decodes shorthand, acronyms, nicknames, and internal language so Claude understands requests like a colleague would. CLAUDE.md for working memory, memory/ directory for the full knowledge base.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the `how` and `why` skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in navigating and manipulating git history. Covers finding bugs with bisect, understanding code evolution, recovering lost work, and rewriting history safely. Understands that git history is your time machine. Use when "git history, git bisect, find when bug introduced, recover deleted, rewrite history, git blame, lost commit, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in running effective incident postmortems. Covers blameless analysis, root cause investigation, action item prioritization, and building a learning culture. Understands that incidents are opportunities to improve systems, not punish people. Use when "postmortem, incident review, what went wrong, root cause, blameless, outage, post-incident, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。