本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

output-auditor

Multi-angle review of responses before delivery. Audits from 4 perspectives -- factual accuracy, logical consistency, completeness, and safety. Use for high-stakes responses where errors have real consequences.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Output Auditor: 4-Angle Response Review

Review every response from 4 independent angles before delivery.

The 4 audit angles

Angle 1: Factual accuracy

Is every claim true?

Check:

  • File paths exist
  • Function names are correct
  • Code quotes match actual files
  • Version numbers are current
  • Behavior descriptions match actual code

Angle 2: Logical consistency

Does the response contradict itself?

Check:

  • Does the diagnosis match the suggested fix?
  • Are the steps in the right order?
  • Do dependencies match (step 3 doesn't require something from step 5)?
  • Are there circular arguments?
  • Does the explanation match the code?

Angle 3: Completeness

Is anything missing?

Check:

  • Does it answer the actual question?
  • Are edge cases covered?
  • Are prerequisites mentioned?
  • Is there a rollback plan for risky changes?
  • Are there obvious alternatives not mentioned?

Angle 4: Safety

Could this cause harm?

Check:

  • Could this code change break existing functionality?
  • Could this advice create a security vulnerability?
  • Could this command cause data loss?
  • Are there race conditions or concurrency issues?
  • Is error handling adequate?

Audit process

  1. Write the response
  2. Run each angle as a mental checkpoint
  3. For each issue found, fix it before delivering
  4. If you can't fix it, flag it clearly in the response

Severity levels

CRITICAL: Wrong information that would cause harm (wrong security advice, data-destroying command) -> Must fix before delivering. If you can't fix, do not deliver.

WARNING: Incomplete or potentially misleading information -> Fix if possible. If not, add a clear caveat.

MINOR: Style issues, missing context that isn't essential -> Fix if quick. Otherwise note for follow-up.

Quick audit checklist

Before sending any response with code or technical advice:

[ ] Every file path verified with Glob [ ] Every function/variable verified with Grep or Read [ ] Steps are in correct order [ ] No self-contradictions [ ] The actual question is answered [ ] Dangerous operations have warnings [ ] Rollback path exists for destructive changes

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Complete methodology for preventing AI hallucinations. Use when accuracy is critical and you need Claude to verify before claiming, cite before asserting, and admit uncertainty instead of guessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

a-ariff/ariff-claude-plugins142026年3月29日 更新

Transform rough ideas into solid designs through structured questioning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

a-ariff/ariff-claude-plugins142026年3月29日 更新

Canvas API Connection Skill

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

a-ariff/ariff-claude-plugins142026年3月29日 更新

Forces every code-related claim to include file:line citations. No citation means the claim must be verified or removed. Use when building documentation, writing code reviews, or any output that others will rely on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

a-ariff/ariff-claude-plugins142026年3月29日 更新

Assign confidence scores (0-100) to every claim in a response. Helps users understand which parts are verified facts and which are educated guesses. Use when the user needs to know how much to trust each part of the answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

a-ariff/ariff-claude-plugins142026年3月29日 更新

Forces Claude to extract exact quotes from files before making claims about them. Prevents hallucinations by grounding every statement in actual text from the codebase. Use when working with large files or unfamiliar code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

a-ariff/ariff-claude-plugins142026年3月29日 更新

a-ariff のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する