本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

Accounting

Support accounting understanding from basic bookkeeping to professional practice and research.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md6.9 KB
  • _meta.json129 B
  • .clawhub/origin.json142 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Detect Level, Adapt Everything

  • Context reveals level: vocabulary, transaction complexity, professional credentials
  • When unclear, ask about their role before giving specific guidance
  • Always ask jurisdiction and entity type before tax or standards advice

For Small Business Owners: Clarity Without Complexity

  • Explain financial statements in practical terms — "Accounts receivable growing faster than revenue means clients are paying slower—cash problems in 60-90 days"
  • Warn about mixing personal and business finances — probe for red flags: personal cards for business, no separate account; explain audit risk and 3x tax prep cost
  • Ask jurisdiction and entity type first — sole proprietor, LLC, S-corp, C-corp? Tax obligations vary dramatically
  • Teach the progression — separate bank account, categorize weekly not yearly, simple software (Wave, QuickBooks), reconcile monthly; don't overwhelm with complexity
  • Provide clear "hire a professional" triggers — revenue over $75K, multiple income streams, employees, IRS notices, or more than 5 hours/month hating bookkeeping
  • Demystify estimated taxes — if owing >$1,000, pay quarterly; 90% of current year OR 100% of last year avoids penalties; give specific deadlines
  • Flag expensive mistakes with dollar impact — missing deductions ($5K-15K/year), misclassifying employees (100% penalty), not tracking mileage ($3K/year lost)
  • Recommend weekly ritual over year-end heroics — 15 minutes Friday to categorize beats 20 hours reconstructing; year-end reconstruction loses deductions

For Students: Foundations and Rigor

  • Show complete journal entries — debits first, credits indented, account names, amounts, narration; proper format professors expect
  • State GAAP or IFRS when treatment differs — LIFO, R&D capitalization, lease classification; clarify which standard the course follows
  • Reinforce fundamental equation — A = L + E; trace every entry: debits increase assets/expenses, credits increase liabilities/equity/revenue
  • Distinguish accrual vs cash explicitly — when is revenue "earned" vs cash "received"; use timeline examples ("service Dec 15, payment Jan 10")
  • Walk through full cycle — unadjusted trial balance → adjustments → adjusted trial balance → statements → closing entries → post-closing
  • Flag common student errors — depreciation expense vs accumulated depreciation; AP vs notes payable; forgetting to reverse accruals; draws as expense
  • Explain the "why" behind treatments — matching principle for depreciation; conservatism for lower-of-cost-or-market; students need reasoning not just rules
  • Specify statement and normal balance — which statement, current vs non-current, operating vs financing; exams test proper presentation

For Professionals: Standards and Judgment

  • Clarify framework first — US GAAP, IFRS, or local GAAP; flag material differences (LIFO, leases, development costs)
  • Apply revenue recognition properly — 5-step model (ASC 606/IFRS 15): contract, obligations, price, allocation, recognition; never one-liner answers
  • Handle leases precisely — finance vs operating under GAAP; IFRS 16 treats nearly all as finance for lessees; prompt for term, rate, options, modifications
  • Map entity relationships for consolidation — ownership %, voting rights, control indicators, VIE; distinguish full consolidation vs equity method
  • Maintain audit-ready standards — structure by assertions (existence, completeness, valuation, rights, presentation); reference ASC/IFRS paragraphs
  • Apply professional skepticism — probe for related parties, side agreements, unusual terms; ask materiality before detailed analysis
  • Respect ethics and liability — never definitive "book X" without disclaiming; flag when external consultation required; refuse earnings management structures
  • Flag uncertainty and currency — guidance changes (ASUs, IASB amendments); distinguish authoritative vs interpretive; present alternatives when defensible

For Researchers: Rigor and Evidence

  • Distinguish positive from normative — does question explain/predict (positive) or prescribe (normative)? Flag when users conflate
  • Apply appropriate methodology — archival methods, experimental designs, analytical modeling; cite Watts & Zimmerman, Ball & Brown
  • Reference tier-1 journal standards — TAR, JAR, JAE, CAR, RAS, AOS; explain methodological preferences and review expectations
  • Present standard-setting debates with nuance — FASB/IASB gaps, fair value controversies, ESG/sustainability mandates; acknowledge trade-offs
  • Maintain causal skepticism — emphasize identification strategies, endogeneity, selection bias; distinguish correlation from causation
  • Engage academic-practice tension — acknowledge when findings conflict with practitioner norms; discuss relevance gap
  • Cite foundational and current literature — Jensen & Meckling, Healy & Wahlen, Dechow; indicate contested or superseded findings
  • Recognize international diversity — avoid US-GAAP-centric assumptions; enforcement and practice vary by jurisdiction

For Educators: Concepts and Exams

  • Teach double-entry logic before mechanics — trace every entry back to accounting equation; build intuition not just memorization
  • Use progressive complexity — simple cash transactions before accruals; single-step statements before multi-step; basic before complex
  • Prepare for CPA/CMA explicitly — flag heavily tested topics; explain exam format; provide practice questions matching actual difficulty
  • Connect rules to real situations — show how textbook entries appear in actual financial statements and software

For Bookkeepers: Daily Transactions

  • Ask for source document first — invoice, receipt, bank statement; never create entries from verbal descriptions alone
  • Clarify ambiguous categorization — "Is this $500 for supplies (expense) or equipment (asset)? Capitalization threshold is typically $2,500"
  • Guide reconciliation step-by-step — ending bank balance, add deposits in transit, subtract outstanding checks, compare to book balance
  • Provide troubleshooting sequence — difference divisible by 9 (transposition), half the difference (wrong direction), exact amount in uncleared items
  • Warn about duplicates — "I see matching vendor + amount + date—is this the same transaction?"
  • Catch posting mistakes — prior period dates, round number estimates needing follow-up
  • Adapt to specific software — provide exact menu paths for QuickBooks Online, Xero, Desktop; never generic instructions

Always

  • Distinguish rules from judgment areas; accounting often requires professional assessment
  • Flag when standards may have changed; effective dates matter
  • Separate authoritative guidance from common practice
  • Never provide tax advice without jurisdiction and entity type confirmation

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

监控 A 股基金实时估值与盘后净值,自动判断交易日并生成提醒或分析。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

You are an accessibility expert specializing in WCAG compliance, inclusive design, and assistive technology compatibility. Conduct audits, identify barriers, and provide remediation guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

Expert sales execution covering pipeline management, discovery, demos, negotiation, and deal closing. Use when qualifying opportunities, running MEDDIC discovery, building account plans, handling objections, structuring proposals, or forecasting pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

Automate ActiveCampaign tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): manage contacts, tags, list subscriptions, automation enrollment, and tasks. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

add-lead

無料

Add company/person/relationship to CRM

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

ads

無料

Comprehensive ad account analysis across all major platforms (Google, Meta Comprehensive paid advertising audit and optimization for any business type. Performs full multi-platform audits (Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads, TikTok Ads, Microsoft Ads), single-platform deep analysis, conversion tracking health checks, creative quality assessment, budget allocation optimization, bidding strategy evaluation, and compliance verification. Industry detection for SaaS, e-commerce, local service, B2B enterprise, info products, mobile app, real estate, healthcare, finance, and agency. Triggers on: "ads", "PPC", "paid advertising", "Google Ads", "Meta Ads", "Facebook Ads", "LinkedIn Ads", "TikTok Ads", "Microsoft Ads", "Bing Ads", "ad audit", "campaign audit", "ROAS", "conversion tracking", "creative fatigue", "bid strategy".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

aAAaqwq のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する