本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

domain-authority-auditor

Use when auditing domain authority, trust, or citation credibility; runs a peer-relative 40-item CITE profile with evidence coverage and verified manipulation/penalty veto checks. Not for page-level content quality — use content-quality-auditor; not for backlink profiling alone — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 域名权威/网站可信度

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md9.6 KB
  • references/auditor-runtime.md19.9 KB
  • references/example-report.md4.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Domain Authority Auditor

Audit one domain's citation-trust signals relative to a declared peer cohort. Produce a complete CITE score only when all applicable evidence and comparison context are present. CITE is advisory; it does not predict whether an answer engine will cite the domain.

When This Must Trigger

  • The user asks whether a domain is trustworthy, authoritative, or citation-ready.
  • A campaign needs a peer-relative CITE baseline or rerun.
  • Link, entity, penalty, or citation evidence may materially change a domain gate.

Quick Start

Audit example.com against these five same-stage U.S. SaaS peers.
Run the CITE content-publisher profile; mark every private-data gap Unknown.

Skill Contract

Use offsite-signal-analyzer for link diagnosis without a gate, content-quality-auditor for one page, and entity-registry for canonical entity repair. Compare multiple domains as separate same-profile runs; never score them as one pooled target.

Reads: one domain, one locked cohort, and dated citation/identity/trust/eminence evidence. Writes: only a permissioned v3 artifact. Done when: context is complete, all 40 states are explicit, the scorer result is preserved, and any saved artifact validates.

Instructions

Runtime Reads

  • ../../../references/auditor-runbook.md
  • ../../../references/scoring-semantics.md
  • ../../../references/cite-domain-rating.md
  • ../../../references/framework-catalog.json
  • ../../../references/runtime-invocation.md
  • references/auditor-runtime.md

Runtime Contract

Read ../../../references/auditor-runbook.md, scoring-semantics.md, cite-domain-rating.md, and the CITE entry in framework-catalog.json. For standalone installs, use bundled immutable references/auditor-runtime.md; never fetch mutable main or guess missing policy. Before deterministic calls, follow runtime-invocation.md, resolve AARON_SKILLS_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || true)}", and require the scorer, validator, and typed catalogs. If unavailable, return score_state: NOT_SCORED / score_confidence: not_scored with no gate verdict or persistent artifact.

Required Setup

Declare:

  • one canonical domain and observation date;
  • market and entity stage;
  • domain type/profile: default, content-publisher, product-service, ecommerce, community-ugc, tool-utility, or authority-institutional;
  • a locked peer cohort with inclusion rules and evidence window.

Without peer cohort, market, stage, or domain type, return NEEDS_INPUT/UNDECIDED; the inherited numeric anchors are diagnostic priors, not universal thresholds.

Data Sources

NeedPreferred evidence
LinksDated backlink export/index with known coverage
IdentityStructured data, canonical profiles, knowledge-graph/public entity evidence
TrustLink-history comparison, security checks, authorized console evidence
EminenceSearch/analytics visibility and locked peer/query panels
CohortNamed domains plus inclusion/exclusion, market, stage, type, and window

Evidence Procedure

  1. Normalize the domain and verify scope (host/subdomain/protocol treatment).
  2. Freeze backlink, entity, security, search visibility, citation-panel, and reputation evidence with sources/dates.
  3. Evaluate all 40 IDs against the declared cohort. Tool estimates remain estimated or proxy; user exports remain user-provided unless independently verified.
  4. Use Unknown for absent backlink indexes, private console data, or comparison universes. Do not mark link-dependent items N/A simply because data is unavailable.
  5. Apply catalog-authorized N/A only with a reason, for example an AI-citation item when no locked panel is in scope.
  6. Verify vetoes positively:
    • CITE-T03: material link/traffic incoherence plus corroborating manipulation evidence relative to the cohort.
    • CITE-T05: verified manipulation network after common-source/ecosystem adjustment.
    • CITE-T09: verified active manual action or material unresolved deindexing.

Domain youth, privacy-protected WHOIS, low absolute volume, or missing private-console access cannot by themselves fail a veto.

Create a typed audit-run.schema.json input and execute python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/rubric-score.py" score <run.json> when the verified runtime is available. Never renormalize weights around Unknown items.

Report

Begin with the auditor-runbook's exact typed conversation header. Never replace status, verdict, or score_state with prose; list each explicitly missing qualified item as ``ID: `unknown``` before findings.

Lead with verdict, profile/cohort/target/date, score or NOT_SCORED coverage/interval, and confidence. Then provide:

  • C/I/T/E score and coverage table;
  • peer-relative evidence and cohort definition;
  • verified risks versus unresolved Unknowns;
  • top fixes with owner, evidence needed, and rerun condition;
  • provenance appendix, including qualified IDs when detailed traceability is requested.

Use SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED as the canonical artifact verdict. User-facing prose may say trusted/cautious only as a descriptive translation, never as a separate decision system.

Verdict Rules

  • Complete, no veto, healthy score/no failures: DONE + SHIP.
  • Complete, remediation needed or one veto: DONE_WITH_CONCERNS + FIX; one veto caps final at 59.
  • Complete, 2+ verified vetoes: DONE + BLOCK; no final score.
  • Missing applicable/cohort evidence: NEEDS_INPUT + UNDECIDED; no score.

Route link investigation to offsite-signal-analyzer, technical/index evidence to technical-seo-checker, entity repair to entity-registry, and page quality to content-quality-auditor.

§2 CITE Worked Examples

  • Complete product-service profile, raw 78, one verified T09 failure: DONE_WITH_CONCERNS/FIX, final 59.
  • Complete profile, raw 45, one verified T05 failure: final remains 45; the ceiling never raises a score.
  • Verified T03 and T05 failures with complete evidence: DONE/BLOCK, raw retained, no final score.
  • Missing backlink universe or private-console evidence: affected items are Unknown and no total is emitted.

§3 CITE Guardrails

  • Young domain age and WHOIS privacy are neutral without contradictory evidence.
  • A press/launch spike can explain link velocity; test the explanation before labeling manipulation.
  • Absolute volume is interpreted within peer cohort, entity stage, market, and domain type.
  • Public index absence does not prove a private manual action; T09 requires positive evidence.

§5 CITE Translation

Use plain descriptions by default. On a trace request, show CITE-T03, CITE-T05, and CITE-T09 with source/date/cohort; never expose an unqualified ID.

Persistence

Persist only after explicit authorization. Assemble the complete v3 draft, validate it against the intended memory/audits/domain/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md relative path, persist only through one full-content Write, and revalidate the target. Edit/shell/MCP mutations of the reserved sink are unsupported. Use:

python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/validate-audit-artifact.py" <draft> --relative-path <target>

The audit request itself does not authorize hot-cache, candidate, or registry writes.

Validation Checkpoints

  • Target/profile/market/stage/cohort are explicit and locked.
  • All 40 IDs have evidence-backed state, Unknown, or valid N/A.
  • Absolute anchors were not applied as cohort-independent laws.
  • Vetoes are verified failures, not absence-of-evidence shortcuts.
  • Scorer output, coverage, confidence, status, and verdict are preserved.
  • Persisted artifact is permissioned, path-correct, minimized, and validator-clean.

Reference Materials

Next Best Skill

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when auditing a paid ad account for incremental contribution, wasted spend, or measurement integrity before scaling; runs a typed 20-item ROAS profile with verified vetoes and a SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED gate on own exported data. Not for campaign structure design — use campaign-architect; not for creative production — use ad-creative-builder. 付费广告账户审计/ROAS评分

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills2,9152026年10月13日 更新

Use when the user asks to "write ad copy", "generate RSA headlines", or "build ad creative at volume"; produces ad units — RSA headlines/descriptions, hooks, and an angle matrix — message-matched to the destination landing page. Not for scoring an ad account — use ad-account-auditor; not for the post-click page — use landing-optimizer; not for organic articles — use content-writer. 广告创意/广告文案/RSA标题

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills2,9152026年10月13日 更新

Use when the user asks to "design an A/B test", "set up a creative/landing test", "run an incrementality test", or "is this result statistically and practically material?"; produces a hypothesis, variant matrix, sample-size/duration/power plan, and a documented effect/uncertainty read from own exported results. It applies only a precommitted owner-approved action rule; the statistical helper never chooses a business action. Not for producing variants — use ad-creative-builder; not for reading back one shipped change — use paid-measurement-loop. 广告AB测试设计/实验设计/显著性判定/增效测试

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills2,9152026年10月13日 更新

Use when the user asks to "design an employee advocacy program", "set up founder-led sharing", or "build a share kit for the team"; produces an advocacy program blueprint in two modes — participation-driven opt-in (default) or top-down assigned with its coercion and authenticity risks flagged — with a voluntary opt-in roster spec submitted as channel-registry proposal events, share kits with mandatory per-person variation, staggered human posting windows plus anti-pod guardrails (no coordinated identical reshares, no engagement rings), per-person material-connection disclosure lines per FTC and 《互联网广告管理办法》, and a Slack/Teams distribution spec. Not for paid creator campaigns — use campaign-planner. 员工倡导/创始人IP分享/内部分享计划/披露合规

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills2,9152026年10月13日 更新

Use when platform-reported conversions disagree with GA4/ecommerce, when you suspect Meta and Google are double-counting the same sales, or for a standing (monthly) reconciliation workbook that de-dups stacked credit against an order-ID truth set, normalizes attribution windows and currency, compares attribution models, and reads incrementality from a geo/holdout test. Not for the point-in-time R2 veto or RQS gate — use ad-account-auditor; not for the ROI/ROAS ratio math itself — use roi-calculator; not for organic dark-social share attribution or GA4 direct-traffic decomposition — use dark-social-attributor. 付费广告归因对账/去重/增量

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills2,9152026年10月13日 更新

Use when the user asks to "map what our buyers believe", "capture the objections we keep hearing", or "find the switching forces that move the beachhead"; produces a belief map of the beachhead — held beliefs and mental models, the recurring objections and their reframes, and the JTBD four forces (push of the problem, pull of the new, anxiety of switching, habit of the present) — each item sourced from interviews or win-loss notes (User-provided) and labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, with any unverified quote or comparative claim marked "[needs source]" and routed to the claims candidates, never adjudicated here. Not for demographic or persona profiling — use audience-mapper; not for the positioning canvas — use positioning-truth-tracer. 受众信念/异议地图/切换四力/流失语言

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills2,9152026年10月13日 更新

aaron-he-zhu のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する