Use when the user asks to "audit our launch plan", "are we ready to launch", or evaluate launch execution/outcomes; runs one typed RAMP preflight, execution, or outcome profile without mixing time horizons. Not for recording launch state — use launch-registry; not for running launch day — use launch-day-conductor. 发布就绪审计/RAMP分阶段评估/发布前放行
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Audit one launch at one lifecycle read. Preflight evaluates readiness/assets plus planned policy and instrumentation red lines; execution evaluates observed launch-window operation; outcome evaluates post-lag proof. There is no cross-time composite.
Run RAMP preflight for launch alpha against the registry stage, canon, claims, rules, and event QA.
Run the outcome profile at day 30; keep it separate from the preflight result.
Reads: one launch, one lifecycle read, registry/canon/claims state, and profile-specific evidence. Writes: only a permissioned v3 artifact. Done when: the selected profile is complete or its exact Unknowns are reported, with no launch execution or registry mutation.
launch-registry owns stage/date/embargo facts. launch-day-conductor executes the runbook. This auditor only judges the frozen evidence.
| Need | Preferred evidence |
|---|---|
| Stage/access | Projected launch record plus direct access/eligibility check |
| Narrative/claims | Canon version, claims projection, rendered assets |
| Operations/rules | Launch plan, commitments, dated official platform rules |
| Instrumentation | Verified events/UTMs and destination truth checks |
| Execution | Timestamped action/incident/response evidence |
| Outcomes | Own analytics/CRM/store truth after declared lag |
../../../references/auditor-runbook.md../../../references/scoring-semantics.md../../../references/ramp-benchmark.md../../../references/runtime-invocation.mdreferences/auditor-runtime.mdRead ../../../references/auditor-runbook.md, scoring-semantics.md, ramp-benchmark.md, and the RAMP catalog entry. Standalone installs use bundled immutable references/auditor-runtime.md; never fetch mutable main. Before deterministic calls, follow runtime-invocation.md, resolve AARON_SKILLS_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || true)}", and require the scorer, validator, and typed catalogs. If unavailable, return score_state: NOT_SCORED / score_confidence: not_scored with no gate verdict or persistent artifact.
Declare profile/lifecycle read (preflight|execution|outcome), target launch, launch type, market, access model, observation date, and evidence window.
Every observed state needs source/date/type/confidence. Missing applicable evidence is Unknown; catalog-authorized conditional items may be N/A with reason. Run python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/rubric-score.py" score <run.json> on the selected typed profile.
Verify profile-relevant vetoes: RAMP-R1 stage/access contradiction, RAMP-A1 material claim/disclosure failure, RAMP-M1 planned or observed manipulation/embargo/platform violation, and RAMP-P1 demonstrably broken instrumentation on participating surfaces.
DONE/SHIP, final 80.DONE_WITH_CONCERNS/FIX, final 59.DONE/BLOCK, no final score.NEEDS_INPUT/UNDECIDED, no score.State lifecycle read with every result. On trace request, qualify RAMP-R1/A1/M1/P1, especially against colliding ROAS IDs.
Begin with the auditor-runbook's exact typed conversation header. Never replace status, verdict, or score_state with prose; list each explicitly missing qualified item as ``ID: unknown``` before findings. Use the stable catalog ID verbatim (for example, RAMP-R1); never substitute an evidence-subcheck label or synthesize a suffixed ID such as RAMP-R1d`.
Lead with lifecycle-specific verdict, target/context/date, score or coverage/interval, confidence, profile detail, linked prior reads, critical evidence, Unknowns, and fix/rerun owner. A preflight SHIP authorizes no external launch action by itself; explicit execution approval remains required.
Persist only after explicit authorization to memory/audits/launch/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md. Preserve the scorer's orthogonal status and verdict; validate the complete v3 draft with validate-audit-artifact.py against the intended relative path, persist only through one full-content Write, and revalidate the target per the auditor runbook. Edit/shell/MCP mutations of the reserved sink are unsupported. Create separate files for separate lifecycle reads and link them by launch ID rather than overwriting.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when auditing a paid ad account for incremental contribution, wasted spend, or measurement integrity before scaling; runs a typed 20-item ROAS profile with verified vetoes and a SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED gate on own exported data. Not for campaign structure design — use campaign-architect; not for creative production — use ad-creative-builder. 付费广告账户审计/ROAS评分
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "write ad copy", "generate RSA headlines", or "build ad creative at volume"; produces ad units — RSA headlines/descriptions, hooks, and an angle matrix — message-matched to the destination landing page. Not for scoring an ad account — use ad-account-auditor; not for the post-click page — use landing-optimizer; not for organic articles — use content-writer. 广告创意/广告文案/RSA标题
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "design an A/B test", "set up a creative/landing test", "run an incrementality test", or "is this result statistically and practically material?"; produces a hypothesis, variant matrix, sample-size/duration/power plan, and a documented effect/uncertainty read from own exported results. It applies only a precommitted owner-approved action rule; the statistical helper never chooses a business action. Not for producing variants — use ad-creative-builder; not for reading back one shipped change — use paid-measurement-loop. 广告AB测试设计/实验设计/显著性判定/增效测试
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "design an employee advocacy program", "set up founder-led sharing", or "build a share kit for the team"; produces an advocacy program blueprint in two modes — participation-driven opt-in (default) or top-down assigned with its coercion and authenticity risks flagged — with a voluntary opt-in roster spec submitted as channel-registry proposal events, share kits with mandatory per-person variation, staggered human posting windows plus anti-pod guardrails (no coordinated identical reshares, no engagement rings), per-person material-connection disclosure lines per FTC and 《互联网广告管理办法》, and a Slack/Teams distribution spec. Not for paid creator campaigns — use campaign-planner. 员工倡导/创始人IP分享/内部分享计划/披露合规
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when platform-reported conversions disagree with GA4/ecommerce, when you suspect Meta and Google are double-counting the same sales, or for a standing (monthly) reconciliation workbook that de-dups stacked credit against an order-ID truth set, normalizes attribution windows and currency, compares attribution models, and reads incrementality from a geo/holdout test. Not for the point-in-time R2 veto or RQS gate — use ad-account-auditor; not for the ROI/ROAS ratio math itself — use roi-calculator; not for organic dark-social share attribution or GA4 direct-traffic decomposition — use dark-social-attributor. 付费广告归因对账/去重/增量
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "map what our buyers believe", "capture the objections we keep hearing", or "find the switching forces that move the beachhead"; produces a belief map of the beachhead — held beliefs and mental models, the recurring objections and their reframes, and the JTBD four forces (push of the problem, pull of the new, anxiety of switching, habit of the present) — each item sourced from interviews or win-loss notes (User-provided) and labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, with any unverified quote or comparative claim marked "[needs source]" and routed to the claims candidates, never adjudicated here. Not for demographic or persona profiling — use audience-mapper; not for the positioning canvas — use positioning-truth-tracer. 受众信念/异议地图/切换四力/流失语言
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。