本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ad-opsec-telemetry

The telemetry each Active Directory technique generates and what alerts a defender: Kerberoasting produces Event 4769 with RC4 encryption (0x17) and an MDI alert, DCSync produces Event 4662 with the DS-Replication-Get-Changes GUID, AS-REP roasting produces Event 4768 with no pre-auth, LSASS dumping is blocked by EDR, plus a lateral-movement telemetry table by protocol (SMB/WMI/WinRM/RDP/DCOM). Use this whenever you run or plan an offensive AD technique and need to know what noise it makes, when writing the engagement's detection notes, or when a defender wants to know what to monitor. Teaches red teamers what is loud and blue teamers what to watch. Standard-tooling knowledge, no vendor engine.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md9.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

AD OPSEC and Telemetry

Every technique leaves a trace. The goal here is not evasion. It is knowing the noise profile of each action so you can document it for the client before the engagement, pick the quieter of two functionally equivalent techniques, and correlate what you did with what their SOC saw. For a defender, read the same tables backwards: they are the events to monitor and alert on.

Two rules of engagement throughout:

  • Document the noise. Tell the client what each high-signal action generated, with the event ID and the source IP, so they can find it in their logs.
  • Coordinate the loud ones. DCSync, mass spraying, coercion at scale, and LSASS dumps need explicit client sign-off or an end-of-engagement window when detection no longer matters.

Microsoft Defender for Identity (MDI) is the sensor that matters most in AD; it reads DC traffic directly and ships tuned detections for most of what follows.


Kerberoasting: Event 4769, RC4 (0x17)

Requesting service tickets for accounts with SPNs, to crack offline.

  • Event 4769 (Kerberos service ticket requested) fires for each SPN targeted. The tell is Ticket Encryption Type = 0x17 (RC4-HMAC). Attackers request RC4 because the resulting hash cracks fastest, but a service that normally uses AES suddenly requested with RC4 is the classic signature.
  • MDI: "Suspected Kerberoasting attack" is on by default and triggers on the volume and RC4 pattern.
  • Requesting all SPNs at once amplifies the signal. Targeting one high-value account is far quieter than roasting the whole domain.
GetUserSPNs.py corp.local/user:pass -dc-ip <dc_ip> -request -outputfile roast.txt
  • MITRE: T1558.003 (Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets: Kerberoasting).
  • Defender watch: 4769 with 0x17 for accounts that otherwise use AES; a single principal requesting many distinct SPN tickets in a short window.
  • Remediation: strong (25+ char) service-account passwords or gMSA; AES-only on service accounts; monitor 4769 by encryption type.

AS-REP Roasting: Event 4768, no pre-auth

Cracking accounts that have Kerberos pre-authentication disabled, no valid credential needed to request the roastable material.

  • Event 4768 (TGT requested) with Pre-Authentication Type = 0. Normal accounts always pre-authenticate; a 4768 with no pre-auth is the signature.
  • MDI: "Suspected AS-REP Roasting attack."
GetNPUsers.py corp.local/ -usersfile users.txt -dc-ip <dc_ip> -no-pass -format hashcat
  • MITRE: T1558.004 (AS-REP Roasting).
  • Defender watch: 4768 with pre-auth type 0; any account carrying DONT_REQUIRE_PREAUTH.
  • Remediation: remove DONT_REQUIRE_PREAUTH wherever possible; strong passwords on accounts that genuinely need it; alert on the flag being set.

DCSync: Event 4662, replication GUIDs

Replicating credentials out of the DC using directory-replication rights. High severity, never transparent, so coordinate before running.

  • Event 4662 (operation on a directory object) with the replication rights GUIDs:
    • 1131f6aa-9c07-11d1-f79f-00c04fc2dcd2: DS-Replication-Get-Changes
    • 1131f6ad-9c07-11d1-f79f-00c04fc2dcd2: DS-Replication-Get-Changes-All
  • MDI: "Suspected DCSync attack (replication of directory services)": a critical alert in any competent SOC.
  • The source host in the DC logs is your machine's IP, not a real DC. That mismatch (a non-DC requesting replication) is itself the detection.
secretsdump.py corp.local/user:pass@dc01.corp.local -just-dc-user krbtgt
  • MITRE: T1003.006 (OS Credential Dumping: DCSync).
  • Defender watch: 4662 with the Get-Changes GUIDs from any principal that is not a DC; replication requests sourced from non-DC IPs.
  • Remediation: audit and minimize who holds Get-Changes / Get-Changes-All; alert on replication from non-DC sources; tier-0 isolation.

LSASS dumping: blocked by EDR

Dumping process memory of lsass.exe to extract credentials.

  • Modern EDR in blocking mode (CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne, Defender for Endpoint) intercepts MiniDumpWriteDump against lsass. The result is a blocked/empty dump, a crashed process, or an immediate alert naming your tool.
  • Event 4688 (process creation) plus EDR-specific handle-to-lsass telemetry.

Alternatives that avoid touching lsass live:

  • SAM/SYSTEM/SECURITY registry hive dump (local admin) → offline parsing.
  • DPAPI offline extraction.
  • Volume Shadow Copy of the hive + offline parse.
  • gMSA / LAPS fetch over LDAP (no endpoint touch at all).
# Registry-hive route: avoids a live lsass handle
secretsdump.py -sam sam.save -system system.save LOCAL
  • MITRE: T1003.001 (LSASS Memory).
  • Defender watch: process handles opened to lsass with read/VM-read access; EDR memory-access alerts.
  • Remediation: Credential Guard; LSASS as a protected process (RunAsPPL); EDR in blocking mode.

BloodHound collection: a recognizable LDAP signature

  • Collector queries have well-known shapes: (objectCategory=computer) pulling dozens of attributes, plus queries for msDS-AllowedToDelegateTo, delegation and ACL attributes in bulk.

  • MDI and legacy ATA carry specific detection for BloodHound-style enumeration.

  • Quieter collection requests only the attributes it needs (never *) and spreads queries over time instead of firing them all at connect.

  • MITRE: T1087 (Account Discovery), T1069 (Permission Groups Discovery).

  • Defender watch: a single principal issuing large attribute-heavy LDAP sweeps in a short window.


Lateral movement: telemetry by protocol

When you need remote execution, the protocol you pick determines the noise. From loudest to quietest:

ProtocolTelemetryOPSEC note
PsExec (SCM service install)Event 7045 service install — very visible, routinely EDR-blockedAvoid when EDR is active
WMI execEvent 4688 process create — MDE detectsQuieter than PsExec
Scheduled taskEvent 4698/4702 task created — moderately visibleAcceptable
WinRM / PSRemotingLegitimate channel, but Event 4624 logon type 3 + PowerShell logsPreferred when available
DCOM / MMCFewer known signaturesBest profile under EDR
  • MITRE: T1021 (Remote Services) and subtechniques; T1569.002 (Service Execution); T1053.005 (Scheduled Task); T1047 (WMI).
  • Rule: record which protocol you used and its profile in the report, so the client can correlate with their endpoint logs.

Coercion and NTLM relay: high-volume auth noise

  • Coercion (PetitPotam, PrinterBug, DFSCoerce) forces a target to authenticate to you, producing inbound auth requests visible in SIEM. Coercing at scale generates hundreds of auth events.

  • ntlmrelayx in automatic mode can capture credentials of real users in production, so coordinate before running it against a live environment.

  • MITRE: T1187 (Forced Authentication), T1557.001 (LLMNR/NBT-NS Poisoning and SMB Relay).

  • Defender watch: spikes of inbound authentications to a non-standard host; EFSRPC / spoolss / DFS RPC calls to unexpected destinations.

  • Remediation: SMB signing enforced; LDAP channel binding; EPA on AD CS web endpoints; disable spooler on DCs.


SMB null sessions: reconnaissance signal

  • Windows Server 2016+ disables null sessions by default; some SOCs alert on the attempt as anonymous recon.

  • When you hold credentials, always use them. Null session is a last-resort fallback only, and worth documenting when used.

  • MITRE: T1135 (Network Share Discovery), T1087.


Actions that require explicit coordination

Show a warning and get sign-off (or document that it ran) before any of these:

ActionWhy
DCSyncCritical MDI alert; your IP visible in DC logs
Password sprayingRisk of locking out real accounts
ntlmrelayx (auto)May capture real users' credentials in production
Coercion at scaleHundreds of auth requests, SIEM-visible
Kerberoasting all accountsMDI volume alert; document targeted accounts
LSASS dumpEDR-detectable; risk of crashing the process

How to use this

Running a technique: check its row, warn the client about the events it will generate, and prefer the quieter equivalent when there is one (WMI over PsExec, one SPN over the whole domain, registry-hive over live lsass). Writing the report: turn these tables into the detection-and-remediation section so the defender can find every action you took and close the gap that let it work.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

acl-abuse

無料

Abusing Active Directory object ACLs (DACL/ownership) for privilege escalation and lateral movement (GenericAll, GenericWrite, WriteDACL, WriteOwner, AddMember, ForceChangePassword, and replication rights via DS-Replication-Get-Changes-All). Use when BloodHound CE shows an outbound control edge from a principal you own toward a higher-value object, and you want the exact bloodyAD/impacket command to weaponize that ACE, plus detection and remediation. DCSync is covered here strictly as a post-compromise technique, not a user entry path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ADScanPro/Claude-AD2102026年8月25日 更新

Real-world Active Directory environment constraints that silently break attacks when ignored: NTLM disabled (Kerberos fallback), AES-only KDCs (RC4 blocked by GPO), LDAP signing and channel binding requiring LDAPS on 636, Kerberos clock skew (KRB_AP_ERR_SKEW), SPNs that must be FQDNs never short names or IPs (the misleading invalidCredentials), Protected Users / LAPS / gMSA / MachineAccountQuota, LDAP 1000-object paging, and VPN latency. Use this whenever a bind, TGT request, LDAP query, or SMB negotiation fails in a way that looks like bad credentials but is really hardening, or before running any AD tooling against a domain you have not fingerprinted. Standard-tooling knowledge (netexec, impacket, certipy, bloodyAD, kerbrute), no vendor-specific engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ADScanPro/Claude-AD2102026年8月25日 更新

The order of operations for an Active Directory penetration test: setup, collection, exploitation, post-processing. Use this whenever you are planning or driving an AD assessment and need to know what to run before what and why (map before you exploit; harvest easy credentials before spraying to avoid lockouts; collect the graph before you reason about paths). Covers phase sequencing with standard tooling: netexec/nxc, impacket, certipy, bloodyAD, kerbrute, BloodHound CE. Invoke it at the start of an engagement, when deciding the next phase, or when a step feels out of order.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ADScanPro/Claude-AD2102026年8月25日 更新

Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) escalation techniques ESC1 through ESC17, driven by hand with Certipy (ly4k). Use when the target runs a Certificate Authority and you want to find vulnerable certificate templates or CA misconfigurations, request a certificate that impersonates a privileged user, and know the exact certipy command, what each ESC actually checks, the Windows Event IDs that fire, and the remediation. ESC1 and ESC8 are the two you hit most in the field.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ADScanPro/Claude-AD2102026年8月25日 更新

Authentication coercion (PetitPotam MS-EFSR, PrinterBug MS-RPRN, DFSCoerce MS-DFSNM) chained into NTLM relay (impacket ntlmrelayx) toward LDAP, AD CS web enrollment (ESC8), or SMB. Use when SMB signing is not enforced or LDAP channel binding is missing, and you want to force a privileged machine account to authenticate to your relay and turn that into RBCD, a DCSync-capable ACL grant, or a certificate. Includes the exact Coercer/ntlmrelayx commands, requirements, detection, and remediation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ADScanPro/Claude-AD2102026年8月25日 更新

A high-level conceptual mapping from Active Directory attack techniques to the compliance controls they touch. Kerberoasting relates to authentication and logging, so it brushes ENS op.acc.5 / op.exp.8, NIS2 Art.21(2)(h), DORA RTS Art.9 / Art.21. Use this when a reader wants to understand which regulatory control an AD finding relates to, or to add an orientation note to a technical finding. This is a conceptual, orientative mapping only; it is NOT an auditor-defensible, curated, ID-by-ID control matrix. Covers ENS (op.acc.*, op.exp.*), NIS2 (Directive 2022/2555 Art.21), and DORA (RTS 2024/1774).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ADScanPro/Claude-AD2102026年8月25日 更新

ADScanPro のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する