本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

01-auto-arena

Automatically evaluate and compare multiple AI models or agents without pre-existing test data. Generates test queries from a task description, collects responses from all target endpoints, auto-generates evaluation rubrics, runs pairwise comparisons via a judge model, and produces win-rate rankings with reports and charts. Supports checkpoint resume, incremental endpoint addition, and judge model hot-swap. Use when the user asks to compare, benchmark, or rank multiple models or agents on a custom task, or run an arena-style evaluation.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md9.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Auto Arena Skill

End-to-end automated model comparison using the OpenJudge AutoArenaPipeline:

  1. Generate queries — LLM creates diverse test queries from task description
  2. Collect responses — query all target endpoints concurrently
  3. Generate rubrics — LLM produces evaluation criteria from task + sample queries
  4. Pairwise evaluation — judge model compares every model pair (with position-bias swap)
  5. Analyze & rank — compute win rates, win matrix, and rankings
  6. Report & charts — Markdown report + win-rate bar chart + optional matrix heatmap

Prerequisites

# Install OpenJudge
pip install py-openjudge

# Extra dependency for auto_arena (chart generation)
pip install matplotlib

Gather from user before running

InfoRequired?Notes
Task descriptionYesWhat the models/agents should do (set in config YAML)
Target endpointsYesAt least 2 OpenAI-compatible endpoints to compare
Judge endpointYesStrong model for pairwise evaluation (e.g. gpt-4, qwen-max)
API keysYesEnv vars: OPENAI_API_KEY, DASHSCOPE_API_KEY, etc.
Number of queriesNoDefault: 20
Seed queriesNoExample queries to guide generation style
System promptsNoPer-endpoint system prompts
Output directoryNoDefault: ./evaluation_results
Report languageNo"zh" (default) or "en"

Quick start

CLI

# Run evaluation
python -m cookbooks.auto_arena --config config.yaml --save

# Use pre-generated queries
python -m cookbooks.auto_arena --config config.yaml \
  --queries_file queries.json --save

# Start fresh, ignore checkpoint
python -m cookbooks.auto_arena --config config.yaml --fresh --save

# Re-run only pairwise evaluation with new judge model
# (keeps queries, responses, and rubrics)
python -m cookbooks.auto_arena --config config.yaml --rerun-judge --save

Python API

import asyncio
from cookbooks.auto_arena.auto_arena_pipeline import AutoArenaPipeline

async def main():
    pipeline = AutoArenaPipeline.from_config("config.yaml")
    result = await pipeline.evaluate()

    print(f"Best model: {result.best_pipeline}")
    for rank, (model, win_rate) in enumerate(result.rankings, 1):
        print(f"{rank}. {model}: {win_rate:.1%}")

asyncio.run(main())

Minimal Python API (no config file)

import asyncio
from cookbooks.auto_arena.auto_arena_pipeline import AutoArenaPipeline
from cookbooks.auto_arena.schema import OpenAIEndpoint

async def main():
    pipeline = AutoArenaPipeline(
        task_description="Customer service chatbot for e-commerce",
        target_endpoints={
            "gpt4": OpenAIEndpoint(
                base_url="https://api.openai.com/v1",
                api_key="sk-...",
                model="gpt-4",
            ),
            "qwen": OpenAIEndpoint(
                base_url="https://dashscope.aliyuncs.com/compatible-mode/v1",
                api_key="sk-...",
                model="qwen-max",
            ),
        },
        judge_endpoint=OpenAIEndpoint(
            base_url="https://api.openai.com/v1",
            api_key="sk-...",
            model="gpt-4",
        ),
        num_queries=20,
    )
    result = await pipeline.evaluate()
    print(f"Best: {result.best_pipeline}")

asyncio.run(main())

CLI options

FlagDefaultDescription
--config—Path to YAML configuration file (required)
--output_dirconfig valueOverride output directory
--queries_file—Path to pre-generated queries JSON (skip generation)
--saveFalseSave results to file
--freshFalseStart fresh, ignore checkpoint
--rerun-judgeFalseRe-run pairwise evaluation only (keep queries/responses/rubrics)

Minimal config file

task:
  description: "Academic GPT assistant for research and writing tasks"

target_endpoints:
  model_v1:
    base_url: "https://api.openai.com/v1"
    api_key: "${OPENAI_API_KEY}"
    model: "gpt-4"
  model_v2:
    base_url: "https://api.openai.com/v1"
    api_key: "${OPENAI_API_KEY}"
    model: "gpt-3.5-turbo"

judge_endpoint:
  base_url: "https://api.openai.com/v1"
  api_key: "${OPENAI_API_KEY}"
  model: "gpt-4"

Full config reference

task

FieldRequiredDescription
descriptionYesClear description of the task models will be tested on
scenarioNoUsage scenario for additional context

target_endpoints.<name>

FieldDefaultDescription
base_url—API base URL (required)
api_key—API key, supports ${ENV_VAR} (required)
model—Model name (required)
system_prompt—System prompt for this endpoint
extra_params—Extra API params (e.g. temperature, max_tokens)

judge_endpoint

Same fields as target_endpoints.<name>. Use a strong model (e.g. gpt-4, qwen-max) with low temperature (~0.1) for consistent judgments.

query_generation

FieldDefaultDescription
num_queries20Total number of queries to generate
seed_queries—Example queries to guide generation
categories—Query categories with weights for stratified generation
endpointjudge endpointCustom endpoint for query generation
queries_per_call10Queries generated per API call (1–50)
num_parallel_batches3Parallel generation batches
temperature0.9Sampling temperature (0.0–2.0)
top_p0.95Top-p sampling (0.0–1.0)
max_similarity0.85Dedup similarity threshold (0.0–1.0)
enable_evolutionfalseEnable Evol-Instruct complexity evolution
evolution_rounds1Evolution rounds (0–3)
complexity_levels["constraints", "reasoning", "edge_cases"]Evolution strategies

evaluation

FieldDefaultDescription
max_concurrency10Max concurrent API requests
timeout60Request timeout in seconds
retry_times3Retry attempts for failed requests

output

FieldDefaultDescription
output_dir./evaluation_resultsOutput directory
save_queriestrueSave generated queries
save_responsestrueSave model responses
save_detailstrueSave detailed results

report

FieldDefaultDescription
enabledfalseEnable Markdown report generation
language"zh"Report language: "zh" or "en"
include_examples3Examples per section (1–10)
chart.enabledtrueGenerate win-rate chart
chart.orientation"horizontal""horizontal" or "vertical"
chart.show_valuestrueShow values on bars
chart.highlight_besttrueHighlight best model
chart.matrix_enabledfalseGenerate win-rate matrix heatmap
chart.format"png"Chart format: "png", "svg", or "pdf"

Interpreting results

Win rate: percentage of pairwise comparisons a model wins. Each pair is evaluated in both orders (original + swapped) to eliminate position bias.

Rankings example:

  1. gpt4_baseline       [################----] 80.0%
  2. qwen_candidate      [############--------] 60.0%
  3. llama_finetuned      [##########----------] 50.0%

Win matrix: win_matrix[A][B] = how often model A beats model B across all queries.

Checkpoint & resume

The pipeline saves progress after each step. Interrupted runs resume automatically:

  • --fresh — ignore checkpoint, start from scratch
  • --rerun-judge — re-run only the pairwise evaluation step (useful when switching judge models); keeps queries, responses, and rubrics intact
  • Adding new endpoints to config triggers incremental response collection; existing responses are preserved

Output files

evaluation_results/
├── evaluation_results.json     # Rankings, win rates, win matrix
├── evaluation_report.md        # Detailed Markdown report (if enabled)
├── win_rate_chart.png          # Win-rate bar chart (if enabled)
├── win_rate_matrix.png         # Matrix heatmap (if matrix_enabled)
├── queries.json                # Generated test queries
├── responses.json              # All model responses
├── rubrics.json                # Generated evaluation rubrics
├── comparison_details.json     # Pairwise comparison details
└── checkpoint.json             # Pipeline checkpoint

API key by model

Model prefixEnvironment variable
gpt-*, o1-*, o3-*OPENAI_API_KEY
claude-*ANTHROPIC_API_KEY
qwen-*, dashscope/*DASHSCOPE_API_KEY
deepseek-*DEEPSEEK_API_KEY
Custom endpointset api_key + base_url in config

Additional resources

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when the user wants help with academic papers or citations but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — reviewing a paper, checking a BibTeX file for fake references, or benchmarking multiple LLMs on reference-recommendation accuracy. Also use when the user mentions paper review, peer review, BibTeX verification, citation checking, reference hallucination, or academic literature accuracy and hasn't specified which of those three tasks they mean. This skill is the entry router for the academic-eval suite: it asks one diagnostic question then routes to the right sub-skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

agentscope-ai/OpenJudge8732026年9月11日 更新

Use when the user wants to compare or benchmark multiple LLMs/agents arena-style but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — a general-purpose win-rate comparison on a custom task, or a benchmark specifically about reference/citation hallucination rate. Also use when the user mentions model arena, agent arena, pairwise model comparison, win-rate ranking, or comparing models on a task and hasn't specified whether that task is generic or about citation accuracy. This skill is the entry router for the arena-eval suite: it asks one diagnostic question when needed, then recommends the workflow or workflows needed to cover the request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

agentscope-ai/OpenJudge8732026年9月11日 更新

Build custom LLM evaluation pipelines using the OpenJudge framework. Covers selecting and configuring graders (LLM-based, function-based, agentic), running batch evaluations with GradingRunner, combining scores with aggregators, applying evaluation strategies (voting, average), auto-generating graders from data, and analyzing results (pairwise win rates, statistics, validation metrics). Use when the user wants to evaluate LLM outputs, compare multiple models, design scoring criteria, or build an automated evaluation system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

agentscope-ai/OpenJudge8732026年9月11日 更新

Review academic papers for correctness, quality, and novelty using OpenJudge's multi-stage pipeline. Supports PDF files and LaTeX source packages (.tar.gz/.zip). Covers 10 disciplines: cs, medicine, physics, chemistry, biology, economics, psychology, environmental_science, mathematics, social_sciences. Use when the user asks to review, evaluate, critique, or assess a research paper, check references, or verify a BibTeX file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

agentscope-ai/OpenJudge8732026年9月11日 更新

Verify a BibTeX file for hallucinated or fabricated references by cross-checking every entry against CrossRef, arXiv, and DBLP. Reports each reference as verified, suspect, or not found, with field-level mismatch details (title, authors, year, DOI). Use when the user wants to check a .bib file for fake citations, validate references in a paper, or audit bibliography entries for accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

agentscope-ai/OpenJudge8732026年9月11日 更新

Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented (ReAct + web search) mode. Use when the user asks to evaluate, benchmark, or compare models on academic reference hallucination, literature recommendation quality, or citation accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

agentscope-ai/OpenJudge8732026年9月11日 更新

agentscope-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する