本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

baseline-extraction-for-clinical-trials

Extracts clinical trial baseline data (study, region, participants, etc.) from article text or PMID. Checks PubMed for metadata; always falls back to LLM extraction for full details.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB
  • baseline-extraction-for-clinical-trials_audit_result_v1.json12.1 KB
  • references/extraction_schema.md1.2 KB
  • scripts/extract_pdf.py2.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Baseline Extraction (RCT)

This skill extracts 10 key baseline characteristics from clinical trial articles. It implements a hybrid workflow:

  1. PubMed Lookup: Checks PubMed API using the PMID to verify existence and get basic metadata.
  2. LLM Extraction: Analyzes the article text to extract detailed baseline data (since PubMed metadata is limited).

When to Use

  • Use this skill when you need extracts clinical trial baseline data (study, region, participants, etc.) from article text or pmid. checks pubmed for metadata; always falls back to llm extraction for full details in a reproducible workflow.
  • Use this skill when a data analytics task needs a packaged method instead of ad-hoc freeform output.
  • Use this skill when the user expects a concrete deliverable, validation step, or file-based result.
  • Use this skill when scripts/extract_pdf.py is the most direct path to complete the request.
  • Use this skill when you need the baseline-extraction for clinical trials package behavior rather than a generic answer.

Key Features

  • Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Extracts clinical trial baseline data (study, region, participants, etc.) from article text or PMID. Checks PubMed for metadata; always falls back to LLM extraction for full details.
  • Packaged executable path(s): scripts/extract_pdf.py.
  • Reference material available in references/ for task-specific guidance.
  • Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

Dependencies

  • Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
  • Third-party packages: not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.

Example Usage

cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Data Analytics/baseline-extraction-for-clinical-trials"
python -m py_compile scripts/extract_pdf.py
python scripts/extract_pdf.py --help

Example run plan:

  1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
  2. Edit the in-file CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
  3. Run python scripts/extract_pdf.py with the validated inputs.
  4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

Implementation Details

See ## Workflow above for related details.

  • Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
  • Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
  • Primary implementation surface: scripts/extract_pdf.py.
  • Reference guidance: references/ contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
  • Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
  • Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

Workflow

Step 1: Check PubMed (Deterministic)

If the user provides a PMID, use the baseline_extractor.py script to check PubMed.

import subprocess
import json

# Replace <PMID> with actual PMID
result = subprocess.run(["python", "scripts/baseline_extractor.py", "<PMID>"], capture_output=True, text=True)
print(result.stdout)

Analyze the Script Output:

  • If status is "success": Stop here. Return the data JSON to the user.
  • If status is "not_found", "incomplete", or "error" (or if no PMID was provided): Proceed to Step 2.

Step 2: LLM Extraction (Fallback)

If Step 1 did not yield a complete result, use the LLM to extract the information from the full article text.

Input:

  • Full article text provided by the user.

Instructions:

  1. Read the Extraction Schema carefully.
  2. Analyze the text to identify all 10 required fields.
  3. Ensure the output is strictly in the JSON format defined in the schema.
  4. Constraint: Do not hallucinate. If a field is not mentioned in the text, set it to null or an empty string.

Output

Return the final result as a Markdown code block containing the JSON object.

{
  "study": "...",
  "region": "...",
  ...
}

Helper Scripts

PDF Text Extraction

When the user provides a PDF file path, use extract_pdf.py to extract the text content before assessment:

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Transform lengthy academic papers into concise, structured 250-word abstracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aipoch/medical-research-skills1,9482026年9月17日 更新

Precision editing tool that reduces abstract word count through intelligent compression techniques, maintaining scientific rigor while meeting strict journal and conference requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aipoch/medical-research-skills1,9482026年9月17日 更新

Refines long medical academic texts into SCI-style unstructured Chinese and English abstracts; use when you need to condense drafts/reports/summaries into bilingual abstracts and generate Summary_Report.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aipoch/medical-research-skills1,9482026年9月17日 更新

Generates submission-ready Elsevier/SCI Highlights from manuscript text or extracted PDF/DOCX/TXT content. Use when a user needs 3-5 concise, evidence-grounded highlight bullets for a research paper, review, meta-analysis, case report, or bioinformatics manuscript.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aipoch/medical-research-skills1,9482026年9月17日 更新

Generates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for multi-drug or class-level safety comparison inside one predefined SOC or AE family using active comparators, disproportionality analysis, subgroup characterization, and reviewer-facing evidence control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aipoch/medical-research-skills1,9482026年9月17日 更新

Analyze data with `adme-property-predictor` using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aipoch/medical-research-skills1,9482026年9月17日 更新

aipoch のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する