本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

changelog-generator

Produce consistent, auditable release notes from Conventional Commits. Separates commit parsing, semantic-bump logic, and changelog rendering for automated releases with editorial control. Use when cutting a release, generating CHANGELOG.md from git history, computing the next semantic version from commits, automating release notes in CI, or planning a hotfix/rollback. Examples: 'generate the changelog for v1.4.0', 'what version bump do these commits require', 'we need an emergency hotfix process'.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(10)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB
  • assets/sample_git_log.txt2.0 KB
  • README.md1.4 KB
  • references/changelog-formatting-guide.md316 B
  • references/ci-integration.md509 B
  • references/hotfix-procedures.md15.4 KB
  • references/monorepo-strategy.md1.3 KB
  • scripts/commit_linter.py3.9 KB
  • scripts/generate_changelog.py7.7 KB
  • scripts/version_bumper.py22.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Changelog Generator

Tier: POWERFUL
Category: Engineering
Domain: Release Management / Documentation

Overview

Use this skill to produce consistent, auditable release notes from Conventional Commits. It separates commit parsing, semantic bump logic, and changelog rendering so teams can automate releases without losing editorial control.

Core Capabilities

  • Parse commit messages using Conventional Commit rules
  • Detect semantic bump (major, minor, patch) from commit stream
  • Render Keep a Changelog sections (Added, Changed, Fixed, etc.)
  • Generate release entries from git ranges or provided commit input
  • Enforce commit format with a dedicated linter script
  • Support CI integration via machine-readable JSON output

When to Use

  • Before publishing a release tag
  • During CI to generate release notes automatically
  • During PR checks to block invalid commit message formats
  • In monorepos where package changelogs require scoped filtering
  • When converting raw git history into user-facing notes

Key Workflows

1. Generate Changelog Entry From Git

python3 scripts/generate_changelog.py \
  --from-tag v1.3.0 \
  --to-tag v1.4.0 \
  --next-version v1.4.0 \
  --format markdown

2. Generate Entry From stdin/File Input

git log v1.3.0..v1.4.0 --pretty=format:'%s' | \
  python3 scripts/generate_changelog.py --next-version v1.4.0 --format markdown

python3 scripts/generate_changelog.py --input commits.txt --next-version v1.4.0 --format json

3. Update CHANGELOG.md

python3 scripts/generate_changelog.py \
  --from-tag v1.3.0 \
  --to-tag HEAD \
  --next-version v1.4.0 \
  --write CHANGELOG.md

4. Compute the Next Version From Commits

When the user has not decided the next version, derive it instead of guessing:

git log v1.3.0..HEAD --oneline | \
  python3 scripts/version_bumper.py --current-version 1.3.0 --output-format json

Output JSON contains recommended_version, bump_type (major/minor/patch/none), and with --include-commands the exact git tag commands. Feed recommended_version into generate_changelog.py --next-version. Pre-releases: add --prerelease alpha|beta|rc. Input must be real git log --oneline output (hex hashes); a sample lives at assets/sample_git_log.txt.

5. Lint Commits Before Merge

python3 scripts/commit_linter.py --from-ref origin/main --to-ref HEAD --strict --format text

Or file/stdin:

python3 scripts/commit_linter.py --input commits.txt --strict
cat commits.txt | python3 scripts/commit_linter.py --format json

Conventional Commit Rules

Supported types:

  • feat, fix, perf, refactor, docs, test, build, ci, chore
  • security, deprecated, remove

Breaking changes:

  • type(scope)!: summary
  • Footer/body includes BREAKING CHANGE:

SemVer mapping:

  • breaking -> major
  • non-breaking feat -> minor
  • all others -> patch

Script Interfaces

  • python3 scripts/generate_changelog.py --help
    • Reads commits from git or stdin/--input
    • Renders markdown or JSON
    • Optional in-place changelog prepend
  • python3 scripts/commit_linter.py --help
    • Validates commit format
    • Returns non-zero in --strict mode on violations

Common Pitfalls

  1. Mixing merge commit messages with release commit parsing
  2. Using vague commit summaries that cannot become release notes
  3. Failing to include migration guidance for breaking changes
  4. Treating docs/chore changes as user-facing features
  5. Overwriting historical changelog sections instead of prepending

Best Practices

  1. Keep commits small and intent-driven.
  2. Scope commit messages (feat(api): ...) in multi-package repos.
  3. Enforce linter checks in PR pipelines.
  4. Review generated markdown before publishing.
  5. Tag releases only after changelog generation succeeds.
  6. Keep an [Unreleased] section for manual curation when needed.

Hotfix Severity & SLAs

When a release goes wrong, classify before acting (full procedures in references/hotfix-procedures.md):

SeverityDefinitionSLAApproval
P0 — CriticalOutage, data loss, exploited vulnerabilityFix deployed ≤ 2h; emergency deploy bypasses normal gatesEngineering Lead + On-call Manager
P1 — HighMajor feature broken, significant user impactFix deployed ≤ 24h; expedited reviewEngineering Lead + Product Manager
P2 — MediumMinor issues, limited impactNext release cycleStandard PR review

Hotfix branch comes from the last stable tag, contains the minimal fix only, and gets its own patch-bump changelog entry via the workflow above.

Rollback Triggers

Pre-commit to these thresholds before tagging; roll back when any fires:

TriggerThreshold
Error rate spike> 2x baseline within 30 min
Performance degradation> 50% latency increase
Feature failureCore functionality broken
Security incidentVulnerability being exploited
Data corruptionDatabase integrity compromised

Prefer feature-flag disable over code rollback; database rollbacks only for non-destructive migrations (forward-only migrations preferred). See references/hotfix-procedures.md.

References

Release Governance

Use this release flow for predictability:

  1. Lint commit history for target release range.
  2. Generate changelog draft from commits.
  3. Manually adjust wording for customer clarity.
  4. Validate semver bump recommendation.
  5. Tag release only after changelog is approved.

Output Quality Checks

  • Each bullet is user-meaningful, not implementation noise.
  • Breaking changes include migration action.
  • Security fixes are isolated in Security section.
  • Sections with no entries are omitted.
  • Duplicate bullets across sections are removed.

CI Policy

  • Run commit_linter.py --strict on all PRs.
  • Block merge on invalid conventional commits.
  • Auto-generate draft release notes on tag push.
  • Require human approval before writing into CHANGELOG.md on main branch.

Monorepo Guidance

  • Prefer commit scopes aligned to package names.
  • Filter commit stream by scope for package-specific releases.
  • Keep infra-wide changes in root changelog.
  • Store package changelogs near package roots for ownership clarity.

Failure Handling

  • If no valid conventional commits found: fail early, do not generate misleading empty notes.
  • If git range invalid: surface explicit range in error output.
  • If write target missing: create safe changelog header scaffolding.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する