本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

chief-customer-officer-advisor

Chief Customer Officer advisory for startups: retention decomposition (gross retention vs NRR honesty, churn root-cause taxonomy), customer segmentation strategy (differential investment across tiers + ICP fit scoring), CS team coverage model (pooled vs named CSM thresholds + ratio math), and CS team org evolution (CS vs Support vs AM distinctions). Use when designing retention strategy, segmenting customers for differential investment, sizing CS team, or sequencing CS hires. Strategic only — does not duplicate engineering/business-growth tactical skills.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(8)

  • SKILL.md11.7 KB
  • references/cs_coverage_model.md7.1 KB
  • references/cs_team_org_evolution.md10.3 KB
  • references/customer_segmentation_strategy.md7.4 KB
  • references/retention_decomposition.md6.9 KB
  • scripts/cs_coverage_calculator.py10.8 KB
  • scripts/customer_segmentation_designer.py12.0 KB
  • scripts/retention_decomposition_analyzer.py11.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Chief Customer Officer Advisor

Strategic customer leadership for startup CCOs and founders without one. Four decisions, no generic CS survey:

  1. What's our retention architecture — and is gross retention vs NRR honest? — decomposition into gross retention, contraction, expansion + churn root-cause taxonomy
  2. How do we segment customers for differential investment? — tier design + ICP fit scoring + investment-per-segment math
  3. What's the CS team's coverage model — and when do we go pooled vs named? — coverage ratio calculator + transition thresholds
  4. What CS role do we hire next? — stage-to-role map (CS ≠ Support ≠ AM ≠ Implementation)

This skill does not cover tactical CS implementation. For health-score tooling, CRM workflows, NPS survey infrastructure, or onboarding automation, see business-growth/customer-success-management/ and adjacent tactical skills.

Keywords

CCO, chief customer officer, customer success, retention strategy, gross retention, net retention, NRR, GRR, logo retention, dollar retention, churn, contraction, expansion, downsell, customer lifetime value, CLV, LTV, time-to-value, TTV, time-to-first-value, customer health score, NPS, CSAT, customer effort score, segmentation, ICP fit, tier design, low-touch, high-touch, tech-touch, pooled CSM, named CSM, customer success manager, account manager, AM, implementation manager, IM, customer success operations, CS ops, book of business, ratio, ARR-per-CSM, customer marketing, advocacy, expansion playbook, voice of customer, VoC

Quick Start

# Decision A: Decompose retention honestly
python scripts/retention_decomposition_analyzer.py                          # embedded B2B SaaS sample
python scripts/retention_decomposition_analyzer.py path/to/cohorts.json

# Decision B: Design customer segmentation + differential investment
python scripts/customer_segmentation_designer.py                            # embedded 4-tier sample
python scripts/customer_segmentation_designer.py path/to/customers.json

# Decision C: Calculate CS team coverage model
python scripts/cs_coverage_calculator.py                                    # embedded 350-customer sample
python scripts/cs_coverage_calculator.py path/to/book.json

Key Questions (ask these first)

  • What's your GROSS retention rate? (Not NRR — NRR hides churn behind expansion. Ask gross first.)
  • What's the #1 reason customers leave? (If you can't name it, you don't understand churn.)
  • What's the median time-to-value (TTV) by segment? (Long TTV in low tier = misfit; long TTV in high tier = onboarding broken.)
  • Which customer would you fire today? (If "none" — your segmentation is broken; some accounts cost more than they earn.)
  • What's your ARR-per-CSM ratio, and what's the model — pooled or named? (Stage and ACV determine the right answer.)
  • Is CS in your comp plan, and how is it different from Sales comp? (CS comp on retention; misalignment is a leading indicator of failure.)

Core Responsibilities

1. Retention Decomposition

The trap: "Our NRR is 115%, retention is great."

The truth: NRR = Gross Retention − Contraction + Expansion. A 115% NRR with 85% gross retention is a leaky bucket masked by upsells. A 115% NRR with 98% gross retention is a healthy product.

Mandatory decomposition every quarter:

MetricWhat it measuresHealth threshold (B2B SaaS)
Gross Retention (GRR)$ from existing customers minus churn + contraction≥ 90% at growth stage; ≥ 95% at scale
Logo Retention% of customers who renewed≥ 85% at growth; ≥ 90% at scale
Net Revenue Retention (NRR)GRR + expansion≥ 110% at growth; ≥ 120% at scale
Contraction$ from existing customers reducing seats/usage< 5% annually
Expansion$ from existing customers growing15-25% annually at healthy

Run retention_decomposition_analyzer.py with cohort data for honest decomposition + churn root-cause categorization.

See references/retention_decomposition.md for the 7-category churn taxonomy + leading indicator playbook.

2. Customer Segmentation

The trap: "Every customer is important."

The reality: customers exist on a spectrum of ICP fit × strategic value. Treating them identically wastes CS capacity and ignores expansion opportunity.

4-tier framework (B2B SaaS baseline):

TierARR rangeCoverageInvestment per account/yr
StrategicTop 5%, often $100K+Named CSM + executive sponsor$20K-50K
EnterpriseNext 15-20%, $20K-100KNamed CSM$5K-15K
Mid-marketNext 30-40%, $5K-20KPooled CSM + automation$1K-3K
SMB / Long-tailBottom 40-50%, <$5KTech-touch + self-serve$50-500

Run customer_segmentation_designer.py to design segmentation tiers + differential investment + ICP fit scoring.

See references/customer_segmentation_strategy.md for ICP fit framework, tier transition triggers, and the kill list (customers below the investment floor).

3. CS Team Coverage Model

The trap: "Hire one CSM per X customers" with a single ratio across all segments.

The reality: coverage model depends on segment, ACV, and complexity. Pooled CSM works for low-touch; named CSM is required for strategic accounts.

Coverage models:

ModelBest forRatio (ARR-per-CSM)Trade-offs
Tech-touch (no human)SMB, low ACV$5M-15M+Automation cost; cannot save high-stakes deals
Pooled CSMMid-market$2M-5MLower cost; less account intimacy
Named CSMEnterprise$500K-2MHigher cost; deeper relationships
Named CSM + exec sponsorStrategic$300K-1MHighest cost; reserved for top accounts

Run cs_coverage_calculator.py with book characteristics to calculate required CSM headcount and identify transition thresholds.

See references/cs_coverage_model.md for ratios, ramp curves, and the "when to add a manager" trigger.

4. CS Team Org Evolution

The wrong question: "Should we hire a CSM or a Support engineer?" The right question: "What's the next customer outcome we're failing to deliver, and what role unblocks that?"

Critical distinctions (founders confuse these):

RoleOwnsDoes NOT own
Customer SupportReactive issue resolution (ticket queue)Renewal, expansion, success outcomes
Customer Success ManagerProactive value realization + renewal + expansion leadDay-to-day tickets, implementation
Account ManagerCommercial relationship + expansion closeDay-to-day success, technical depth
Implementation ManagerOnboarding + go-liveOngoing success after launch
CS OperationsTooling, data, analytics, playbooksDirect customer relationships
Customer MarketingAdvocacy, case studies, references1:1 customer relationships

See references/cs_team_org_evolution.md for stage-to-role map (seed → late-stage) + the AM-vs-CSM split decision.

Workflows

Workflow 1: Quarterly Retention Review (4 hours)

Goal: Decompose retention honestly + identify top-3 churn drivers.

# 1. Pull cohort data: closed/won by quarter for last 8 quarters
python scripts/retention_decomposition_analyzer.py cohorts.json
# 2. Review GRR / NRR / contraction / expansion separately
# 3. For each cohort showing GRR < 90%: identify churn root cause (7-category taxonomy)
# 4. Cross-check with cs-cro-advisor: does the expansion math add up?
# 5. Cross-check with cs-cpo-advisor: are product gaps driving churn?
# 6. Output: top-3 leakage points + 90-day mitigation plan

Workflow 2: Customer Segmentation Audit (1 day)

Goal: Re-segment customer base + reset differential investment.

# 1. Build customers.json with ARR, tenure, ICP fit signals
python scripts/customer_segmentation_designer.py customers.json
# 2. Identify segment migration (mid-market → enterprise upgrades, downsells)
# 3. Identify kill list (customers below investment floor)
# 4. Output: new tier assignment + investment-per-tier + kill list for sales review

Workflow 3: CS Team Sizing (1 week)

Goal: Size the CS team aligned to book composition + coverage model.

# 1. Build book.json with current customer base + planned acquisition
python scripts/cs_coverage_calculator.py book.json
# 2. Calculate required CSM headcount by segment
# 3. Compare to current team; identify gaps
# 4. Cross-check with cs-chro-advisor on comp + leveling
# 5. Cross-check with cs-cfo-advisor on the cost
# 6. Output: 12-month hiring plan + role sequence

Workflow 4: CS Team Roadmap (1 week)

Goal: Sequence next 18 months of CS hires aligned to customer outcomes.

  1. List top 5 customer outcomes the company is failing to deliver
  2. Map each outcome to the role that unblocks it (CSM / AM / IM / Support / CS Ops)
  3. Sequence hires; respect prerequisite order
  4. Cross-check with cs-chro-advisor

Output Standards

**Bottom Line:** [one sentence — decision and rationale]
**The Decision:** [one of: retention | segmentation | coverage | next hire]
**The Evidence:** [numbers from the tool, not adjectives]
**How to Act:** [3 concrete next steps]
**Your Decision:** [the call only the founder can make]

Adjacent Skills

  • c-level-advisor/skills/cro-advisor/ — Revenue math, NRR, expansion comp (CCO owns customer experience; CRO owns revenue math; clean split)
  • c-level-advisor/skills/cpo-advisor/ — Product strategy, JTBD (CCO surfaces product gaps; CPO decides roadmap)
  • c-level-advisor/skills/cmo-advisor/ — Customer marketing, advocacy, references
  • c-level-advisor/skills/cfo-advisor/ — CS team cost, retention-impact-on-revenue math
  • c-level-advisor/skills/chro-advisor/ — CS team hiring + leveling
  • business-growth/ — Tactical CS execution: health scores, CRM workflows, onboarding tooling

References

  • retention_decomposition.md — GRR vs NRR honest math + 7-category churn taxonomy + leading indicator playbook
  • customer_segmentation_strategy.md — 4-tier framework + ICP fit scoring + tier transition triggers + kill list criteria
  • cs_coverage_model.md — Coverage model decision (tech-touch / pooled / named / named+exec) + ratio benchmarks + manager-trigger
  • cs_team_org_evolution.md — Stage-to-role map + 6-role definition table (CSM ≠ Support ≠ AM ≠ IM ≠ CS Ops ≠ Customer Marketing) + AM-vs-CSM split decision + anti-patterns

Version: 1.0.0 Status: Production Ready Disclaimer: Retention benchmarks vary significantly by ACV, segment, and industry. This skill provides B2B SaaS-baseline guidance; consumer SaaS, marketplaces, and hardware all have materially different retention math.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する