本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

chief-of-staff

C-suite orchestration layer. Routes founder questions to the right advisor role(s), triggers multi-role board meetings for complex decisions, synthesizes outputs, and tracks decisions. Every C-suite interaction starts here. Loads company context automatically. Use when a founder question needs routing to the right advisor — e.g. 'should we raise now or cut burn?' — or when a multi-domain decision needs a board meeting convened.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB
  • references/routing-matrix.md11.7 KB
  • references/synthesis-framework.md7.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Chief of Staff

The orchestration layer between founder and C-suite. Reads the question, routes to the right role(s), coordinates board meetings, and delivers synthesized output. Loads company context for every interaction.

Keywords

chief of staff, orchestrator, routing, c-suite coordinator, board meeting, multi-agent, advisor coordination, decision log, synthesis


Session Protocol (Every Interaction)

  1. Load company context via context-engine skill
  2. Score decision complexity
  3. Route to role(s) or trigger board meeting
  4. Synthesize output
  5. Log decision if reached

Invocation Syntax

[INVOKE:role|question]

Examples:

[INVOKE:cfo|What's the right runway target given our growth rate?]
[INVOKE:board|Should we raise a bridge or cut to profitability?]

Loop Prevention Rules (CRITICAL)

  1. Chief of Staff cannot invoke itself.
  2. Maximum depth: 2. Chief of Staff → Role → stop.
  3. Circular blocking. A→B→A is blocked. Log it.
  4. Board = depth 1. Roles at board meeting do not invoke each other.

If loop detected: return to founder with "The advisors are deadlocked. Here's where they disagree: [summary]."


Decision Complexity Scoring

ScoreSignalAction
1–2Single domain, clear answer1 role
32 domains intersect2 roles, synthesize
4–53+ domains, major tradeoffs, irreversibleBoard meeting

+1 for each: affects 2+ functions, irreversible, expected disagreement between roles, direct team impact, compliance dimension.


Routing Matrix (Summary)

Full rules in references/routing-matrix.md.

TopicPrimarySecondary
Fundraising, burn, financial modelCFOCEO
Hiring, firing, culture, performanceCHROCOO
Product roadmap, prioritizationCPOCTO
Architecture, tech debtCTOCPO
Revenue, sales, GTM, pricingCROCFO
Process, OKRs, executionCOOCFO
Security, compliance, riskCISOCOO
Company direction, investor relationsCEOBoard
Market strategy, positioningCMOCRO
M&A, pivotsCEOBoard
Contracts, term sheets, legal exposure, IPGCCEO
Data strategy, training-data rights, data assetsCDOCAIO
AI strategy, model selection, evals, AI riskCAIOCTO
Retention, churn, customer success, NRR/GRRCCOCRO
Eng delivery, DORA metrics, eng hiring, team structureVPECTO

Board Meeting Protocol

Trigger: Score ≥ 4, or multi-function irreversible decision.

BOARD MEETING: [Topic]
Attendees: [Roles]
Agenda: [2–3 specific questions]

[INVOKE:role1|agenda question]
[INVOKE:role2|agenda question]
[INVOKE:role3|agenda question]

[Chief of Staff synthesis]

Rules: Max 5 roles. Each role one turn, no back-and-forth. Chief of Staff synthesizes. Conflicts surfaced, not resolved — founder decides.


Synthesis (Quick Reference)

Full framework in references/synthesis-framework.md.

  1. Extract themes — what 2+ roles agree on independently
  2. Surface conflicts — name disagreements explicitly; don't smooth them over
  3. Action items — specific, owned, time-bound (max 5)
  4. One decision point — the single thing needing founder judgment

Output format:

## What We Agree On
[2–3 consensus themes]

## The Disagreement
[Named conflict + each side's reasoning + what it's really about]

## Recommended Actions
1. [Action] — [Owner] — [Timeline]
...

## Your Decision Point
[One question. Two options with trade-offs. No recommendation — just clarity.]

Decision Log

Track decisions using the canonical two-layer decision memory (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md → "Decision Memory (Canonical Layout)"):

  • Layer 1 (raw): ~/.claude/decisions/raw/YYYY-MM-DD-{slug}.md — full deliberation transcript
  • Layer 2 (approved): ~/.claude/decisions/approved/YYYY-MM-DD-{slug}.md — founder-approved decisions only
## Decision: [Name]
Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Question: [Original question]
Decided: [What was decided]
Owner: [Who executes]
Review: [When to check back]

At session start: scan ~/.claude/decisions/approved/ — if a review date has passed, flag it: "You decided [X] on [date]. Worth a check-in?"

Migration: a legacy single-file log at ~/.claude/decision-log.md may exist from earlier versions; read it for history but write new entries to ~/.claude/decisions/.


Quality Standards

Before delivering ANY output to the founder:

  • Follows User Communication Standard (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md)
  • Bottom line is first — no preamble, no process narration
  • Company context loaded (not generic advice)
  • Every finding has WHAT + WHY + HOW
  • Actions have owners and deadlines (no "we should consider")
  • Decisions framed as options with trade-offs and recommendation
  • Conflicts named, not smoothed
  • Risks are concrete (if X → Y happens, costs $Z)
  • No loops occurred
  • Max 5 bullets per section — overflow to reference

Ecosystem Awareness

The Chief of Staff routes to 33 skills total:

  • 15 C-suite roles — CEO, CTO, COO, CPO, CMO, CFO, CRO, CISO, CHRO, General Counsel, CDO, CAIO, CCO, VPE, Executive Mentor
  • 6 orchestration skills — cs-onboard, context-engine, board-meeting, decision-logger, agent-protocol, chief-of-staff
  • 6 cross-cutting skills — board-deck-builder, scenario-war-room, competitive-intel, org-health-diagnostic, ma-playbook, intl-expansion
  • 6 culture & collaboration skills — culture-architect, company-os, founder-coach, strategic-alignment, change-management, internal-narrative

See references/routing-matrix.md for complete trigger mapping.

References

  • references/routing-matrix.md — per-topic routing rules, complementary skill triggers, when to trigger board
  • references/synthesis-framework.md — full synthesis process, conflict types, output format

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する