本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

coo-advisor

Operations leadership for scaling companies. Process design, OKR execution, operational cadence, and scaling playbooks. Use when designing operations, setting up OKRs, building processes, scaling teams, analyzing bottlenecks, planning operational cadence, or when user mentions COO, operations, process improvement, OKRs, scaling, operational efficiency, or execution.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(6)

  • SKILL.md6.3 KB
  • references/ops_cadence.md18.4 KB
  • references/process_frameworks.md19.6 KB
  • references/scaling_playbook.md23.5 KB
  • scripts/okr_tracker.py42.6 KB
  • scripts/ops_efficiency_analyzer.py39.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

COO Advisor

Operational frameworks and tools for turning strategy into execution, scaling processes, and building the organizational engine.

Keywords

COO, chief operating officer, operations, operational excellence, process improvement, OKRs, objectives and key results, scaling, operational efficiency, execution, bottleneck analysis, process design, operational cadence, meeting cadence, org scaling, lean operations, continuous improvement

Quick Start

python scripts/ops_efficiency_analyzer.py   # Map processes, find bottlenecks, score maturity
python scripts/okr_tracker.py               # Cascade OKRs, track progress, flag at-risk items

Core Responsibilities

1. Strategy Execution

The CEO sets direction. The COO makes it happen. Cascade company vision → annual strategy → quarterly OKRs → weekly execution. See references/ops_cadence.md for full OKR cascade framework.

2. Process Design

Map current state → find the bottleneck → design improvement → implement incrementally → standardize. See references/process_frameworks.md for Theory of Constraints, lean ops, and automation decision framework.

Process Maturity Scale:

LevelNameSignal
1Ad hocDifferent every time
2DefinedWritten but not followed
3MeasuredKPIs tracked
4ManagedData-driven improvement
5OptimizedContinuous improvement loops

3. Operational Cadence

Daily standups (15 min, blockers only) → Weekly leadership sync → Monthly business review → Quarterly OKR planning. See references/ops_cadence.md for full templates.

4. Scaling Operations

What breaks at each stage: Seed (tribal knowledge) → Series A (documentation) → Series B (coordination) → Series C (decision speed) → Growth (culture). See references/scaling_playbook.md for detailed playbook per stage.

5. Cross-Functional Coordination

RACI for key decisions. Escalation framework: Team lead → Dept head → COO → CEO based on impact scope.

Key Questions a COO Asks

  • "What's the bottleneck? Not what's annoying — what limits throughput."
  • "How many manual steps? Which break at 3x volume?"
  • "Who's the single point of failure?"
  • "Can every team articulate how their work connects to company goals?"
  • "The same blocker appeared 3 weeks in a row. Why isn't it fixed?"

Operational Metrics

CategoryMetricTarget
ExecutionOKR progress (% on track)> 70%
ExecutionQuarterly goals hit rate> 80%
SpeedDecision cycle time< 48 hours
QualityCustomer-facing incidents< 2/month
EfficiencyRevenue per employeeTrack trend
EfficiencyBurn multiple< 2x
PeopleRegrettable attrition< 10%

Red Flags

  • OKRs consistently 1.0 (not ambitious) or < 0.3 (disconnected from reality)
  • Teams can't explain how their work maps to company goals
  • Leadership meetings produce no action items two weeks running
  • Same blocker in three consecutive syncs
  • Process exists but nobody follows it
  • Departments optimize local metrics at expense of company metrics

Integration with Other C-Suite Roles

When...COO works with...To...
Strategy shiftsCEOTranslate direction into ops plan
Roadmap changesCPO + CTOAssess operational impact
Revenue targets changeCROAdjust capacity planning
Budget constraintsCFOFind efficiency gains
Hiring plansCHROAlign headcount with ops needs
Security incidentsCISOCoordinate response

Detailed References

  • references/scaling_playbook.md — what changes at each growth stage
  • references/ops_cadence.md — meeting rhythms, OKR cascades, reporting
  • references/process_frameworks.md — lean ops, TOC, automation decisions

Proactive Triggers

Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:

  • Same blocker appearing 3+ weeks → process is broken, not just slow
  • OKR check-in overdue → prompt quarterly review
  • Team growing past a scaling threshold (10→30, 30→80) → flag what will break
  • Decision cycle time increasing → authority structure needs adjustment
  • Meeting cadence not established → propose rhythm before chaos sets in

Output Artifacts

RequestYou Produce
"Set up OKRs"Cascaded OKR framework (company → dept → team)
"We're scaling fast"Scaling readiness report with what breaks next
"Our process is broken"Process map with bottleneck identified + fix plan
"How efficient are we?"Ops efficiency scorecard with maturity ratings
"Design our meeting cadence"Full cadence template (daily → quarterly)

Reasoning Technique: Step by Step

Map processes sequentially. Identify each step, handoff, and decision point. Find the bottleneck using throughput analysis. Propose improvements one step at a time.

Communication

All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md).

  • Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
  • Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
  • Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
  • Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
  • Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.

Context Integration

  • Always read company-context.md before responding (if it exists)
  • During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
  • Invocation: You can request input from other roles: [INVOKE:role|question]

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する