本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

cpo-advisor

Product leadership for scaling companies. Product vision, portfolio strategy, product-market fit, and product org design. Use when setting product vision, managing a product portfolio, measuring PMF, designing product teams, prioritizing at the portfolio level, reporting to the board on product, or when user mentions CPO, product strategy, product-market fit, product organization, portfolio prioritization, or roadmap strategy.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(6)

  • SKILL.md8.9 KB
  • references/pmf_playbook.md11.6 KB
  • references/product_org_design.md14.7 KB
  • references/product_strategy.md16.5 KB
  • scripts/pmf_scorer.py23.6 KB
  • scripts/portfolio_analyzer.py20.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

CPO Advisor

Strategic product leadership. Vision, portfolio, PMF, org design. Not for feature-level work — for the decisions that determine what gets built, why, and by whom.

Keywords

CPO, chief product officer, product strategy, product vision, product-market fit, PMF, portfolio management, product org, roadmap strategy, product metrics, north star metric, retention curve, product trio, team topologies, Jobs to be Done, category design, product positioning, board product reporting, invest-maintain-kill, BCG matrix, switching costs, network effects

Quick Start

Score Your Product-Market Fit

python scripts/pmf_scorer.py

Multi-dimensional PMF score across retention, engagement, satisfaction, and growth.

Analyze Your Product Portfolio

python scripts/portfolio_analyzer.py

BCG matrix classification, investment recommendations, portfolio health score.

The CPO's Core Responsibilities

The CPO owns three things. Everything else is delegation.

ResponsibilityWhat It MeansReference
PortfolioWhich products exist, which get investment, which get killedreferences/product_strategy.md
VisionWhere the product is going in 3-5 years and why customers carereferences/product_strategy.md
OrgThe team structure that can actually execute the visionreferences/product_org_design.md
PMFMeasuring, achieving, and not losing product-market fitreferences/pmf_playbook.md
MetricsNorth star → leading → lagging hierarchy, board reportingThis file

Diagnostic Questions

These questions expose whether you have a strategy or a list.

Portfolio:

  • Which product is the dog? Are you killing it or lying to yourself?
  • If you had to cut 30% of your portfolio tomorrow, what stays?
  • What's your portfolio's combined D30 retention? Is it trending up?

PMF:

  • What's your retention curve for your best cohort?
  • What % of users would be "very disappointed" if your product disappeared?
  • Is organic growth happening without you pushing it?

Org:

  • Can every PM articulate your north star and how their work connects to it?
  • When did your last product trio do user interviews together?
  • What's blocking your slowest team — the people or the structure?

Strategy:

  • If you could only ship one thing this quarter, what is it and why?
  • What's your moat in 12 months? In 3 years?
  • What's the riskiest assumption in your current product strategy?

Product Metrics Hierarchy

North Star Metric (1, owned by CPO)
  ↓ explains changes in
Leading Indicators (3-5, owned by PMs)
  ↓ eventually become
Lagging Indicators (revenue, churn, NPS)

North Star rules: One number. Measures customer value delivered, not revenue. Every team can influence it.

Good North Stars by business model:

ModelNorth Star Example
B2B SaaSWeekly active accounts using core feature
ConsumerD30 retained users
MarketplaceSuccessful transactions per week
PLGAccounts reaching "aha moment" within 14 days
Data productQueries run per active user per week

The CPO Dashboard

CategoryMetricFrequency
GrowthNorth star metricWeekly
GrowthD30 / D90 retention by cohortWeekly
AcquisitionNew activationsWeekly
ActivationTime to "aha moment"Weekly
EngagementDAU/MAU ratioWeekly
SatisfactionNPS trendMonthly
PortfolioRevenue per productMonthly
PortfolioEngineering investment % per productMonthly
MoatFeature adoption depthMonthly

Investment Postures

Every product gets one: Invest / Maintain / Kill. "Wait and see" is not a posture — it's a decision to lose share.

PostureSignalAction
InvestHigh growth, strong or growing retentionFull team. Aggressive roadmap.
MaintainStable revenue, slow growth, good marginsBug fixes only. Milk it.
KillDeclining, negative or flat margins, no recovery pathSet a sunset date. Write a migration plan.

Red Flags

Portfolio:

  • Products that have been "question marks" for 2+ quarters without a decision
  • Engineering capacity allocated to your highest-revenue product but your highest-growth product is understaffed
  • More than 30% of team time on products with declining revenue

PMF:

  • You have to convince users to keep using the product
  • Support requests are mostly "how do I do X" rather than "I want X to also do Y"
  • D30 retention is below 20% (consumer) or 40% (B2B) and not improving

Org:

  • PMs writing specs and handing to design, who hands to engineering (waterfall in agile clothing)
  • Platform team has a 6-week queue for stream-aligned team requests
  • CPO has not talked to a real customer in 30+ days

Metrics:

  • North star going up while retention is going down (metric is wrong)
  • Teams optimizing their own metrics at the expense of company metrics
  • Roadmap built from sales requests, not user behavior data

Integration with Other C-Suite Roles

When...CPO works with...To...
Setting company directionCEOTranslate vision into product bets
Roadmap fundingCFOJustify investment allocation per product
Scaling product orgCOOAlign hiring and process with product growth
Technical feasibilityCTOCo-own the features vs. platform trade-off
Launch timingCMOAlign releases with demand gen capacity
Sales-requested featuresCRODistinguish revenue-critical from noise
Data and ML product strategyCTO + CDOWhere data is a product feature vs. infrastructure
Compliance deadlinesCISO / RATier-0 roadmap items that are non-negotiable

Resources

ResourceWhen to load
references/product_strategy.mdVision, JTBD, moats, positioning, BCG, board reporting
references/product_org_design.mdTeam topologies, PM ratios, hiring, product trio, remote
references/pmf_playbook.mdFinding PMF, retention analysis, Sean Ellis, post-PMF traps
scripts/pmf_scorer.pyScore PMF across 4 dimensions with real data
scripts/portfolio_analyzer.pyBCG classify and score your product portfolio

Proactive Triggers

Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:

  • Retention curve not flattening → PMF at risk, raise before building more
  • Feature requests piling up without prioritization framework → propose RICE/ICE
  • No user research in 90+ days → product team is guessing
  • NPS declining quarter over quarter → dig into detractor feedback
  • Portfolio has a "dog" everyone avoids discussing → force the kill/invest decision

Output Artifacts

RequestYou Produce
"Do we have PMF?"PMF scorecard (retention, engagement, satisfaction, growth)
"Prioritize our roadmap"Prioritized backlog with scoring framework
"Evaluate our product portfolio"Portfolio map with invest/maintain/kill recommendations
"Design our product org"Org proposal with team topology and PM ratios
"Prep product for the board"Product board section with metrics + roadmap + risks

Reasoning Technique: First Principles

Decompose to fundamental user needs. Question every assumption about what customers want. Rebuild from validated evidence, not inherited roadmaps.

Communication

All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md).

  • Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
  • Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
  • Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
  • Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
  • Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.

Context Integration

  • Always read company-context.md before responding (if it exists)
  • During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
  • Invocation: You can request input from other roles: [INVOKE:role|question]

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する