本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

culture-architect

Build, measure, and evolve company culture as operational behavior — not wall posters. Covers mission/vision/values workshops, values-to-behaviors translation, culture code creation, culture health assessment, and cultural rituals by stage. Use when building company values, assessing culture health, designing cultural rituals, creating culture codes, handling culture clashes, or when user mentions culture, values, culture debt, founder culture, or culture code.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md8.4 KB
  • references/culture-playbook.md12.2 KB
  • templates/culture-code-template.md4.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Culture Architect

Culture is what you DO, not what you SAY. This skill builds culture as an operational system — observable behaviors, measurable health, and rituals that scale.

Keywords

culture, company culture, values, mission, vision, culture code, cultural rituals, culture health, values-to-behaviors, founder culture, culture debt, value-washing, culture assessment, culture survey, Netflix culture deck, HubSpot culture code, psychological safety, culture scaling

Core Principle

Culture = (What you reward) + (What you tolerate) + (What you celebrate)

If your values say "transparency" but you punish bearers of bad news — your real value is "optics." Culture is not aspirational. It's descriptive. The work is closing the gap between stated and actual.

Frameworks

1. Mission / Vision / Values Workshop

Run this conversationally, not as a corporate offsite. Three questions:

Mission — Why do we exist (beyond making money)?

  • "What would be lost if we disappeared tomorrow?"
  • Mission is present-tense. "We reduce preventable falls in elderly care." Not "to be the leading..."

Vision — What does winning look like in 5–10 years?

  • Specific enough to be wrong. "Every care home in Europe uses our system" beats "be the market leader."

Values — What behaviors do we actually model?

  • Start with what you observe, not what sounds good. "What did our last great hire do that nobody asked them to?"
  • Keep to 3–5. More than 5 and none of them mean anything.

2. Values → Behaviors Translation

This is the work. Every value needs behavioral anchors or it's decoration.

ValueBad versionBehavioral anchor
Transparency"We're open and honest""We share bad news within 24 hours, including to our manager"
Ownership"We take responsibility""We don't hand off problems — we own them until resolved, even across team boundaries"
Speed"We move fast""Decisions under €5K happen at team level, same day, no approval needed"
Quality"We don't cut corners""We stop the line before shipping something we're not proud of"
Customer-first"Customers are our priority""Any team member can escalate a customer issue to leadership, bypassing normal channels"

Workshop exercise: Write your value. Then ask "How would a new hire know we actually live this on day 30?" If you can't answer concretely, it's not a value — it's an aspiration.

3. Culture Code Creation

A culture code is a public document that describes how you operate. It should scare off the wrong people and attract the right ones.

Structure:

  1. Who we are (mission + context)
  2. Who thrives here (specific behaviors, not adjectives)
  3. Who doesn't thrive here (honest — this is the useful part)
  4. How we make decisions
  5. How we communicate
  6. How we grow people
  7. What we expect of leaders

See templates/culture-code-template.md for a complete template.

Anti-patterns to avoid:

  • "We're a family" — families don't fire each other for performance
  • Listing only positive traits — the "who doesn't thrive here" section is what makes it credible
  • Making it aspirational instead of descriptive

4. Culture Health Assessment

Run quarterly. 8–12 questions. Anonymous. See references/culture-playbook.md for survey design.

Core areas to measure:

  1. Psychological safety — "Can I raise a concern without fear?"
  2. Clarity — "Do I know how my work connects to company goals?"
  3. Fairness — "Are decisions made consistently and transparently?"
  4. Growth — "Am I learning and being challenged here?"
  5. Trust in leadership — "Do I believe what leadership tells me?"

Score interpretation:

ScoreSignalAction
80–100%HealthyMaintain, celebrate, document
65–79%WarningIdentify specific friction — don't over-react
50–64%DamagedUrgent leadership attention + specific fixes
< 50%CrisisCulture emergency — all-hands intervention

5. Cultural Rituals by Stage

Rituals are the delivery mechanism for culture. What works at 10 people breaks at 100.

Seed stage (< 15 people)

  • Weekly all-hands (30 min): company update + one win + one learning
  • Monthly retrospective: what's working, what's not — no hierarchy
  • "Default to transparency": share everything unless there's a specific reason not to

Early growth (15–50 people)

  • Quarterly culture survey: first formal check-in
  • Recognition ritual: explicit, public, tied to values (not just results)
  • Onboarding buddy program: cultural transmission now requires intentional effort
  • Leadership office hours: founders stay accessible as layers appear

Scaling (50–200 people)

  • Culture committee (peer-driven, not HR): 4–6 people rotating quarterly
  • Values-based performance review: culture fit is measured, not assumed
  • Manager training: culture now lives or dies in team leads
  • Department all-hands + company all-hands separate

Large (200+ people)

  • Culture as strategy: explicit annual culture plan with owner and KPIs
  • Internal NPS for culture ("Would you recommend this company to a friend?")
  • Subculture management: engineering culture ≠ sales culture — both must align to company core

6. Culture Anti-Patterns

Value-washing: Listing values you don't practice. Symptom: employees roll their eyes during values discussions.

  • Fix: Run a values audit. Ask "What did the last person who got promoted demonstrate?" If it doesn't match your values, your real values are different.

Culture debt: Accumulating cultural compromises over time. "We'll address the toxic star performer later." Later compounds.

  • Fix: Act on culture violations faster than you think necessary. One tolerated bad behavior destroys what ten good behaviors build.

Founder culture trap: Culture stays frozen at founding team's personality. New hires assimilate or leave.

  • Fix: Explicitly evolve values as you scale. What worked at 10 people (move fast, ask forgiveness) may be destructive at 100 (we need process).

Culture by osmosis: Assuming culture transmits naturally. It did at 10 people. It doesn't at 50.

  • Fix: Make culture intentional. Document it. Teach it. Measure it. Reward it explicitly.

Culture Integration with C-Suite

When...Culture Architect works with...To...
Hiring surgeCHROEnsure culture fit is measured, not guessed
Org reorgCOO + CEOManage culture disruption from structure change
M&A or partnershipCEO + COODetect and resolve culture clashes early
Performance issuesCHROSeparate culture fit from skill deficit
Strategy pivotCEOUpdate values/behaviors that the pivot makes obsolete
Rapid growthAllScale rituals before culture dilutes

Key Questions a Culture Architect Asks

  • "Can you name the last person we fired for culture reasons? What did they do?"
  • "What behavior got your last promoted employee promoted? Is that in your values?"
  • "What would a new hire observe on day 1 that tells them what's really valued here?"
  • "What do we tolerate that we shouldn't? Who knows and does nothing?"
  • "How does a team lead in Berlin know what the culture is in Madrid?"

Red Flags

  • Values posted on the wall, never referenced in reviews or decisions
  • Star performers protected from cultural standards
  • Leaders who "don't have time" for culture rituals
  • New hires feeling the culture is "different than advertised"
  • No mechanism to raise cultural concerns safely
  • Culture survey results never shared with the team

Detailed References

  • references/culture-playbook.md — Netflix analysis, survey design, ritual examples, M&A playbook
  • templates/culture-code-template.md — Culture code document template

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する