International market expansion strategy. Market selection, entry modes, localization, regulatory compliance, and go-to-market by region. Use when expanding to new countries, evaluating international markets, planning localization, or building regional teams.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Frameworks for expanding into new markets: selection, entry, localization, and execution.
international expansion, market entry, localization, go-to-market, GTM, regional strategy, international markets, market selection, cross-border, global expansion
Decision sequence: Market selection → Entry mode → Regulatory assessment → Localization plan → GTM strategy → Team structure → Launch.
| Factor | Weight | How to Assess |
|---|---|---|
| Market size (addressable) | 25% | TAM in target segment, willingness to pay |
| Competitive intensity | 20% | Incumbent strength, market gaps |
| Regulatory complexity | 20% | Barriers to entry, compliance cost, timeline |
| Cultural distance | 15% | Language, business practices, buying behavior |
| Existing traction | 10% | Inbound demand, existing customers, partnerships |
| Operational complexity | 10% | Time zones, infrastructure, payment systems |
| Mode | Investment | Control | Risk | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Export (sell remotely) | Low | Low | Low | Testing demand |
| Partnership (reseller/distributor) | Medium | Medium | Medium | Markets with strong local requirements |
| Local team (hire in-market) | High | High | High | Strategic markets with proven demand |
| Entity (full subsidiary) | Very high | Full | High | Major markets, regulatory requirement |
| Acquisition | Highest | Full | Highest | Fast market entry with existing base |
Default path: Export → Partnership → Local team → Entity (graduate as revenue justifies).
| Mistake | Why It Happens | Prevention |
|---|---|---|
| Entering too many markets at once | FOMO, board pressure | Max 1-2 new markets per year |
| Copy-paste GTM from home market | Assuming buyers are the same | Research local buying behavior |
| Underestimating regulatory cost | "We'll figure it out" | Regulatory assessment BEFORE committing |
| Hiring too early | Optimism | Prove demand before hiring local team |
| Wrong pricing (just converting) | Laziness | Research willingness to pay locally |
| Role | Contribution |
|---|---|
| CEO | Market selection, strategic commitment |
| CFO | Investment sizing, ROI modeling, entity structure |
| CRO | Revenue targets, sales model adaptation |
| CMO | Positioning, channel strategy, local brand |
| CPO | Localization roadmap, feature priorities |
| CTO | Infrastructure, data residency, scaling |
| CHRO | Local hiring, employment law, comp |
| COO | Operations setup, process adaptation |
references/market-entry-playbook.md — detailed entry playbook by market typereferences/regional-guide.md — specific considerations for key regions (EU, US, APAC, LATAM)まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。