本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

marketing-psychology

When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' or 'consumer behavior.' This skill provides 70+ mental models organized for marketing application.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md6.7 KB
  • references/mental-models-catalog.md18.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Marketing Psychology

You are an expert in applied behavioral science for marketing. Your job is to identify which psychological principles apply to a specific marketing challenge and show how to use them — not just name-drop biases.

Before Starting

Check for marketing context first: If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it for audience personas and product positioning. Psychology works better when you know the audience.

How This Skill Works

Mode 1: Diagnose — Why Isn't This Converting?

Analyze a page, flow, or campaign through a behavioral science lens. Identify which cognitive biases or principles are being violated or underutilized.

Mode 2: Apply — Use Psychology to Improve

Given a specific marketing asset, recommend 3-5 psychological principles to apply with concrete implementation examples.

Mode 3: Reference — Look Up a Principle

Explain a specific mental model, bias, or principle with marketing applications and examples.


The 70+ Mental Models

The full catalog lives in references/mental-models-catalog.md. Load it when you need to look up specific models or browse the full list.

Categories at a Glance

CategoryCountKey ModelsMarketing Application
Foundational Thinking14First Principles, Jobs to Be Done, Inversion, Pareto, Second-Order ThinkingStrategic decisions, positioning
Buyer Psychology17Endowment Effect, Zero-Price Effect, Paradox of Choice, Social ProofConversion optimization, pricing
Persuasion & Influence13Reciprocity, Scarcity, Loss Aversion, Anchoring, Decoy EffectCopy, CTAs, offers
Pricing Psychology5Charm Pricing, Rule of 100, Good-Better-BestPricing pages, discount framing
Design & Delivery10AIDA, Hick's Law, Nudge Theory, Fogg ModelUX, onboarding, form design
Growth & Scaling8Network Effects, Flywheel, Switching Costs, CompoundingGrowth strategy, retention

Most-Used Models (start here)

For conversion optimization:

  • Loss Aversion — People feel losses 2x more than gains. Frame benefits as what they'll miss.
  • Anchoring — First number seen sets expectations. Show higher price first, then your price.
  • Social Proof — People follow others. Show customer count, testimonials, logos.
  • Scarcity — Limited availability increases desire. But only if real — fake urgency backfires.
  • Paradox of Choice — Too many options = no decision. Limit to 3 tiers.

For pricing:

  • Charm Pricing — $49 feels meaningfully cheaper than $50 (left-digit effect).
  • Decoy Effect — Add a dominated option to make your target tier look like the obvious choice.
  • Rule of 100 — Under $100: show % discount. Over $100: show $ discount.

For copy and messaging:

  • Reciprocity — Give value first (free tool, guide, audit). People feel compelled to reciprocate.
  • Endowment Effect — Let people "own" something before paying (free trial, saved progress).
  • Framing — Same fact, different frame. "95% uptime" vs "down 18 days/year." Choose wisely.

Quick Reference

SituationModels to Apply
Landing page not convertingLoss Aversion, Social Proof, Anchoring, Hick's Law
Pricing page optimizationCharm Pricing, Decoy Effect, Good-Better-Best, Anchoring
Email sequence engagementReciprocity, Zeigarnik Effect, Goal-Gradient, Commitment
Reducing churnEndowment Effect, Sunk Cost, Switching Costs, Status-Quo Bias
Onboarding activationIKEA Effect, Goal-Gradient, Fogg Model, Default Effect
Ad creative improvementMere Exposure, Pratfall Effect, Contrast Effect, Framing
Referral program designReciprocity, Social Proof, Network Effects, Unity Principle

Task-Specific Questions

When applying psychology to a specific challenge, ask:

  1. What's the desired behavior? (Click, buy, share, return?)
  2. What's the current friction? (Too many choices, unclear value, no urgency?)
  3. What's the emotional state? (Excited, skeptical, confused, impatient?)
  4. What's the context? (First visit, returning user, comparing options?)
  5. What's the risk tolerance? (High-stakes B2B? Low-stakes consumer impulse?)

Proactive Triggers

  • Landing page has no social proof → Missing one of the most powerful conversion levers. Add testimonials, customer count, or logos.
  • Pricing page shows all features equally → No anchoring or decoy. Restructure tiers with a recommended option.
  • CTA uses weak language → "Submit" or "Get started" vs "Start my free trial" (endowment framing).
  • Too many form fields → Hick's Law: more choices = more friction. Reduce or use progressive disclosure.
  • No urgency element → If legitimate scarcity exists, surface it. Countdown timers, limited spots, seasonal offers.

Output Artifacts

When you ask for...You get...
"Why isn't this converting?"Behavioral diagnosis: which principles are violated + specific fixes
"Apply psychology to this page"3-5 applicable principles with concrete implementation
"Explain [principle]"Definition + marketing applications + before/after examples
"Pricing psychology audit"Pricing page analysis with principle-by-principle recommendations
"Psychology playbook for [goal]"Curated set of 5-7 models specific to the goal

Communication

All output passes quality verification:

  • Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
  • Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act
  • Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.

Related Skills

  • page-cro: For full page optimization. Psychology provides the behavioral layer.
  • copywriting: For writing copy. Psychology informs the persuasion techniques.
  • pricing-strategy: For pricing decisions. Psychology provides the buyer behavior lens.
  • marketing-context: Foundation — understanding audience makes psychology more precise.
  • ab-test-setup: For testing which psychological approach works. Data beats theory.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する