本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

senior-data-engineer

Data engineering skill for building scalable data pipelines, ETL/ELT systems, and data infrastructure. Expertise in Python, SQL, Spark, Airflow, dbt, Kafka, and modern data stack. Includes data modeling, pipeline orchestration, data quality, and DataOps. Use when designing data architectures, building data pipelines, optimizing data workflows, implementing data governance, or troubleshooting data issues.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(9)

  • SKILL.md5.7 KB
  • references/data_modeling_patterns.md26.1 KB
  • references/data_pipeline_architecture.md33.8 KB
  • references/dataops_best_practices.md42.4 KB
  • references/troubleshooting.md3.2 KB
  • references/workflows.md15.1 KB
  • scripts/data_quality_validator.py59.2 KB
  • scripts/etl_performance_optimizer.py64.5 KB
  • scripts/pipeline_orchestrator.py28.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Senior Data Engineer

Production-grade data engineering skill for building scalable, reliable data systems.

Table of Contents

  1. Trigger Phrases
  2. Quick Start
  3. Workflows
  4. Architecture Decision Framework
  5. Tech Stack
  6. Reference Documentation
  7. Troubleshooting

Trigger Phrases

Activate this skill when you see:

Pipeline Design:

  • "Design a data pipeline for..."
  • "Build an ETL/ELT process..."
  • "How should I ingest data from..."
  • "Set up data extraction from..."

Architecture:

  • "Should I use batch or streaming?"
  • "Lambda vs Kappa architecture"
  • "How to handle late-arriving data"
  • "Design a data lakehouse"

Data Modeling:

  • "Create a dimensional model..."
  • "Star schema vs snowflake"
  • "Implement slowly changing dimensions"
  • "Design a data vault"

Data Quality:

  • "Add data validation to..."
  • "Set up data quality checks"
  • "Monitor data freshness"
  • "Implement data contracts"

Performance:

  • "Optimize this Spark job"
  • "Query is running slow"
  • "Reduce pipeline execution time"
  • "Tune Airflow DAG"

Quick Start

Core Tools

# Generate pipeline orchestration config
python scripts/pipeline_orchestrator.py generate \
  --type airflow \
  --source postgres \
  --destination snowflake \
  --schedule "0 5 * * *"

# Validate data quality
python scripts/data_quality_validator.py validate \
  --input data/sales.parquet \
  --schema schemas/sales.json \
  --checks freshness,completeness,uniqueness

# Optimize ETL performance
python scripts/etl_performance_optimizer.py analyze \
  --query queries/daily_aggregation.sql \
  --engine spark \
  --recommend

Workflows

→ See references/workflows.md for details

Architecture Decision Framework

Use this framework to choose the right approach for your data pipeline.

Batch vs Streaming

CriteriaBatchStreaming
Latency requirementHours to daysSeconds to minutes
Data volumeLarge historical datasetsContinuous event streams
Processing complexityComplex transformations, MLSimple aggregations, filtering
Cost sensitivityMore cost-effectiveHigher infrastructure cost
Error handlingEasier to reprocessRequires careful design

Decision Tree:

Is real-time insight required?
├── Yes → Use streaming
│   └── Is exactly-once semantics needed?
│       ├── Yes → Kafka + Flink/Spark Structured Streaming
│       └── No → Kafka + consumer groups
└── No → Use batch
    └── Is data volume > 1TB daily?
        ├── Yes → Spark/Databricks
        └── No → dbt + warehouse compute

Lambda vs Kappa Architecture

AspectLambdaKappa
ComplexityTwo codebases (batch + stream)Single codebase
MaintenanceHigher (sync batch/stream logic)Lower
ReprocessingNative batch layerReplay from source
Use caseML training + real-time servingPure event-driven

When to choose Lambda:

  • Need to train ML models on historical data
  • Complex batch transformations not feasible in streaming
  • Existing batch infrastructure

When to choose Kappa:

  • Event-sourced architecture
  • All processing can be expressed as stream operations
  • Starting fresh without legacy systems

Data Warehouse vs Data Lakehouse

FeatureWarehouse (Snowflake/BigQuery)Lakehouse (Delta/Iceberg)
Best forBI, SQL analyticsML, unstructured data
Storage costHigher (proprietary format)Lower (open formats)
FlexibilitySchema-on-writeSchema-on-read
PerformanceExcellent for SQLGood, improving
EcosystemMature BI toolsGrowing ML tooling

Tech Stack

CategoryTechnologies
LanguagesPython, SQL, Scala
OrchestrationAirflow, Prefect, Dagster
Transformationdbt, Spark, Flink
StreamingKafka, Kinesis, Pub/Sub
StorageS3, GCS, Delta Lake, Iceberg
WarehousesSnowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Databricks
QualityGreat Expectations, dbt tests, Monte Carlo
MonitoringPrometheus, Grafana, Datadog

Reference Documentation

1. Data Pipeline Architecture

See references/data_pipeline_architecture.md for:

  • Lambda vs Kappa architecture patterns
  • Batch processing with Spark and Airflow
  • Stream processing with Kafka and Flink
  • Exactly-once semantics implementation
  • Error handling and dead letter queues

2. Data Modeling Patterns

See references/data_modeling_patterns.md for:

  • Dimensional modeling (Star/Snowflake)
  • Slowly Changing Dimensions (SCD Types 1-6)
  • Data Vault modeling
  • dbt best practices
  • Partitioning and clustering

3. DataOps Best Practices

See references/dataops_best_practices.md for:

  • Data testing frameworks
  • Data contracts and schema validation
  • CI/CD for data pipelines
  • Observability and lineage
  • Incident response

Troubleshooting

→ See references/troubleshooting.md for details

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する