本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

social-media-analyzer

Social media campaign analysis and performance tracking. Calculates engagement rates, ROI, and benchmarks across platforms. Use when analyzing social media performance, calculating engagement rate, measuring campaign ROI, comparing platform metrics, or benchmarking against industry standards. Also use when the user mentions "social media audit," "engagement rate," or "which platform performs best."

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(7)

  • SKILL.md8.4 KB
  • assets/expected_output.json1.5 KB
  • assets/sample_input.json867 B
  • HOW_TO_USE.md1.8 KB
  • references/platform-benchmarks.md5.9 KB
  • scripts/analyze_performance.py7.2 KB
  • scripts/calculate_metrics.py5.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Social Media Analyzer

Campaign performance analysis with engagement metrics, ROI calculations, and platform benchmarks.


Table of Contents


Analysis Workflow

Analyze social media campaign performance:

  1. Validate input data completeness (reach > 0, dates valid)
  2. Calculate engagement metrics per post
  3. Aggregate campaign-level metrics
  4. Calculate ROI if ad spend provided
  5. Compare against platform benchmarks
  6. Identify top and bottom performers
  7. Generate recommendations
  8. Validation: Engagement rate < 100%, ROI matches spend data

Input Requirements

FieldRequiredDescription
platformYesinstagram, facebook, twitter, linkedin, tiktok
posts[]YesArray of post data
posts[].likesYesLike/reaction count
posts[].commentsYesComment count
posts[].reachYesUnique users reached
posts[].impressionsNoTotal views
posts[].sharesNoShare/retweet count
posts[].savesNoSave/bookmark count
posts[].clicksNoLink clicks
total_spendNoAd spend (for ROI)

Data Validation Checks

Before analysis, verify:

  • Reach > 0 for all posts (avoid division by zero)
  • Engagement counts are non-negative
  • Date range is valid (start < end)
  • Platform is recognized
  • Spend > 0 if ROI requested

Engagement Metrics

Engagement Rate Calculation

Engagement Rate = (Likes + Comments + Shares + Saves) / Reach × 100

Metric Definitions

MetricFormulaInterpretation
Engagement RateEngagements / Reach × 100Audience interaction level
CTRClicks / Impressions × 100Content click appeal
Reach RateReach / Followers × 100Content distribution
Virality RateShares / Impressions × 100Share-worthiness
Save RateSaves / Reach × 100Content value

Performance Categories

RatingEngagement RateAction
Excellent> 6%Scale and replicate
Good3-6%Optimize and expand
Average1-3%Test improvements
Poor< 1%Analyze and pivot

ROI Calculation

Calculate return on ad spend:

  1. Sum total engagements across posts
  2. Calculate cost per engagement (CPE)
  3. Calculate cost per click (CPC) if clicks available
  4. Estimate engagement value using benchmark rates
  5. Calculate ROI percentage
  6. Validation: ROI = (Value - Spend) / Spend × 100

ROI Formulas

MetricFormula
Cost Per Engagement (CPE)Total Spend / Total Engagements
Cost Per Click (CPC)Total Spend / Total Clicks
Cost Per Thousand (CPM)(Spend / Impressions) × 1000
Return on Ad Spend (ROAS)Revenue / Ad Spend

Engagement Value Estimates

ActionValueRationale
Like$0.50Brand awareness
Comment$2.00Active engagement
Share$5.00Amplification
Save$3.00Intent signal
Click$1.50Traffic value

ROI Interpretation

ROI %RatingRecommendation
> 500%ExcellentScale budget significantly
200-500%GoodIncrease budget moderately
100-200%AcceptableOptimize before scaling
0-100%Break-evenReview targeting and creative
< 0%NegativePause and restructure

Platform Benchmarks

Engagement Rate by Platform

PlatformAverageGoodExcellent
Instagram1.22%3-6%>6%
Facebook0.07%0.5-1%>1%
Twitter/X0.05%0.1-0.5%>0.5%
LinkedIn2.0%3-5%>5%
TikTok5.96%8-15%>15%

CTR by Platform

PlatformAverageGoodExcellent
Instagram0.22%0.5-1%>1%
Facebook0.90%1.5-2.5%>2.5%
LinkedIn0.44%1-2%>2%
TikTok0.30%0.5-1%>1%

CPC by Platform

PlatformAverageGood
Facebook$0.97<$0.50
Instagram$1.20<$0.70
LinkedIn$5.26<$3.00
TikTok$1.00<$0.50

See references/platform-benchmarks.md for complete benchmark data.


Tools

Calculate Metrics

python scripts/calculate_metrics.py assets/sample_input.json

Calculates engagement rate, CTR, reach rate for each post and campaign totals.

Analyze Performance

python scripts/analyze_performance.py assets/sample_input.json

Generates full performance analysis with ROI, benchmarks, and recommendations.

Output includes:

  • Campaign-level metrics
  • Post-by-post breakdown
  • Benchmark comparisons
  • Top performers ranked
  • Actionable recommendations

Examples

Sample Input

See assets/sample_input.json:

{
  "platform": "instagram",
  "total_spend": 500,
  "posts": [
    {
      "post_id": "post_001",
      "content_type": "image",
      "likes": 342,
      "comments": 28,
      "shares": 15,
      "saves": 45,
      "reach": 5200,
      "impressions": 8500,
      "clicks": 120
    }
  ]
}

Sample Output

See assets/expected_output.json:

{
  "campaign_metrics": {
    "total_engagements": 1521,
    "avg_engagement_rate": 8.36,
    "ctr": 1.55
  },
  "roi_metrics": {
    "total_spend": 500.0,
    "cost_per_engagement": 0.33,
    "roi_percentage": 660.5
  },
  "insights": {
    "overall_health": "excellent",
    "benchmark_comparison": {
      "engagement_status": "excellent",
      "engagement_benchmark": "1.22%",
      "engagement_actual": "8.36%"
    }
  }
}

Interpretation

The sample campaign shows:

  • Engagement rate 8.36% vs 1.22% benchmark = Excellent (6.8x above average)
  • CTR 1.55% vs 0.22% benchmark = Excellent (7x above average)
  • ROI 660% = Outstanding return on $500 spend
  • Recommendation: Scale budget, replicate successful elements

Reference Documentation

Platform Benchmarks

references/platform-benchmarks.md contains:

  • Engagement rate benchmarks by platform and industry
  • CTR benchmarks for organic and paid content
  • Cost benchmarks (CPC, CPM, CPE)
  • Content type performance by platform
  • Optimal posting times and frequency
  • ROI calculation formulas

Proactive Triggers

  • Engagement rate below platform average → Content isn't resonating. Analyze top performers for patterns.
  • Follower growth stalled → Content distribution or frequency issue. Audit posting patterns.
  • High impressions, low engagement → Reach without resonance. Content quality issue.
  • Competitor outperforming significantly → Content gap. Analyze their successful posts.

Output Artifacts

When you ask for...You get...
"Social media audit"Performance analysis across platforms with benchmarks
"What's performing?"Top content analysis with patterns and recommendations
"Competitor social analysis"Competitive social media comparison with gaps

Communication

All output passes quality verification:

  • Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
  • Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act
  • Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.

Related Skills

  • social-content: For creating social posts. Use this skill for analyzing performance.
  • campaign-analytics: For cross-channel analytics including social.
  • content-strategy: For planning social content themes.
  • marketing-context: Provides audience context for better analysis.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する