本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

x-twitter-growth

X/Twitter growth engine for building audience, crafting viral content, and analyzing engagement. Use when the user wants to grow on X/Twitter, write tweets or threads, analyze their X profile, research competitors on X, plan a posting strategy, or optimize engagement. Complements social-content (generic multi-platform) with X-specific depth: algorithm mechanics, thread engineering, reply strategy, profile optimization, and competitive intelligence via web search.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(8)

  • SKILL.md8.5 KB
  • .gitignore14 B
  • references/algorithm-signals.md2.8 KB
  • scripts/competitor_analyzer.py8.1 KB
  • scripts/content_planner.py7.2 KB
  • scripts/growth_tracker.py9.7 KB
  • scripts/profile_auditor.py11.3 KB
  • scripts/tweet_composer.py10.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

X/Twitter Growth Engine

X-specific growth skill. For general social media content across platforms, see social-content. For social strategy and calendar planning, see social-media-manager. This skill goes deep on X.

When to Use This vs Other Skills

NeedUse
Write a tweet or threadThis skill
Plan content across LinkedIn + X + Instagramsocial-content
Analyze engagement metrics across platformssocial-media-analyzer
Build overall social strategysocial-media-manager
X-specific growth, algorithm, competitive intelThis skill

Step 1 — Profile Audit

Before any growth work, audit the current X presence. Run scripts/profile_auditor.py with the handle, or manually assess:

Bio Checklist

  • Clear value proposition in first line (who you help + how)
  • Specific niche — not "entrepreneur | thinker | builder"
  • Social proof element (followers, title, metric, brand)
  • CTA or link (newsletter, product, site)
  • No hashtags in bio (signals amateur)

Pinned Tweet

  • Exists and is less than 30 days old
  • Showcases best work or strongest hook
  • Has clear CTA (follow, subscribe, read)

Recent Activity (last 30 posts)

  • Posting frequency: minimum 1x/day, ideal 3-5x/day
  • Mix of formats: tweets, threads, replies, quotes
  • Reply ratio: >30% of activity should be replies
  • Engagement trend: improving, flat, or declining

Run: python3 scripts/profile_auditor.py --handle @username


Step 2 — Competitive Intelligence

Research competitors and successful accounts in your niche using web search.

Process

  1. Search site:x.com "topic" min_faves:100 via Brave to find high-performing content
  2. Identify 5-10 accounts in your niche with strong engagement
  3. For each, analyze: posting frequency, content types, hook patterns, engagement rates
  4. Run: python3 scripts/competitor_analyzer.py --handles @acc1 @acc2 @acc3

What to Extract

  • Hook patterns — How do top posts start? Question? Bold claim? Statistic?
  • Content themes — What 3-5 topics get the most engagement?
  • Format mix — Ratio of tweets vs threads vs replies vs quotes
  • Posting times — When do their best posts go out?
  • Engagement triggers — What makes people reply vs like vs retweet?

Step 3 — Content Creation

Tweet Types (ordered by growth impact)

1. Threads (highest reach, highest follow conversion)

Structure:
- Tweet 1: Hook — must stop the scroll in <7 words
- Tweet 2: Context or promise ("Here's what I learned:")
- Tweets 3-N: One idea per tweet, each standalone-worthy
- Final tweet: Summary + explicit CTA ("Follow @handle for more")
- Reply to tweet 1: Restate hook + "Follow for more [topic]"

Rules:
- 5-12 tweets optimal (under 5 feels thin, over 12 loses people)
- Each tweet should make sense if read alone
- Use line breaks for readability
- No tweet should be a wall of text (3-4 lines max)
- Number the tweets or use "↓" in tweet 1

2. Atomic Tweets (breadth, impression farming)

Formats that work:
- Observation: "[Thing] is underrated. Here's why:"
- Listicle: "10 tools I use daily:\n\n1. X — for Y"
- Contrarian: "Unpopular opinion: [statement]"
- Lesson: "I [did X] for [time]. Biggest lesson:"
- Framework: "[Concept] explained in 30 seconds:"

Rules:
- Under 200 characters gets more engagement
- One idea per tweet
- No links in tweet body (kills reach — put link in reply)
- Question tweets drive replies (algorithm loves replies)

3. Quote Tweets (authority building)

Formula: Original tweet + your unique take
- Add data the original missed
- Provide counterpoint or nuance
- Share personal experience that validates/contradicts
- Never just say "This" or "So true"

4. Replies (network growth, fastest path to visibility)

Strategy:
- Reply to accounts 2-10x your size
- Add genuine value, not "great post!"
- Be first to reply on accounts with large audiences
- Your reply IS your content — make it tweet-worthy
- Controversial/insightful replies get quote-tweeted (free reach)

Run: python3 scripts/tweet_composer.py --type thread --topic "your topic" --audience "your audience"


Step 4 — Algorithm Mechanics

What X rewards (2025-2026)

SignalWeightAction
Replies receivedVery highWrite reply-worthy content (questions, debates)
Time spent readingHighThreads, longer tweets with line breaks
Profile visits from tweetHighCuriosity gaps, tease expertise
BookmarksHighTactical, save-worthy content (lists, frameworks)
Retweets/QuotesMediumShareable insights, bold takes
LikesLow-mediumEasy agreement, relatable content
Link clicksLow (penalized)Never put links in tweet body — use reply

What kills reach

  • Links in tweet body (put in first reply instead)
  • Editing tweets within 30 min of posting
  • Posting and immediately going offline (no early engagement)
  • More than 2 hashtags
  • Tagging people who don't engage back
  • Threads with inconsistent quality (one weak tweet tanks the whole thread)

Optimal Posting Cadence

Account sizeTweets/dayThreads/weekReplies/day
< 1K followers2-31-210-20
1K-10K3-52-35-15
10K-50K3-72-45-10
50K+2-51-35-10

Step 5 — Growth Playbook

Week 1-2: Foundation

  1. Optimize bio and pinned tweet (Step 1)
  2. Identify 20 accounts in your niche to engage with daily
  3. Reply 10-20 times per day to larger accounts (genuine value only)
  4. Post 2-3 atomic tweets per day testing different formats
  5. Publish 1 thread

Week 3-4: Pattern Recognition

  1. Review what formats got most engagement
  2. Double down on top 2 content formats
  3. Increase to 3-5 posts per day
  4. Publish 2-3 threads per week
  5. Start quote-tweeting relevant content daily

Month 2+: Scale

  1. Develop 3-5 recurring content series (e.g., "Friday Framework")
  2. Cross-pollinate: repurpose threads as LinkedIn posts, newsletter content
  3. Build reply relationships with 5-10 accounts your size (mutual engagement)
  4. Experiment with spaces/audio if relevant to niche
  5. Run: python3 scripts/growth_tracker.py --handle @username --period 30d

Step 6 — Content Calendar Generation

Run: python3 scripts/content_planner.py --niche "your niche" --frequency 5 --weeks 2

Generates a 2-week posting plan with:

  • Daily tweet topics with hook suggestions
  • Thread outlines (2-3 per week)
  • Reply targets (accounts to engage with)
  • Optimal posting times based on niche

Scripts

ScriptPurpose
scripts/profile_auditor.pyAudit X profile: bio, pinned, activity patterns
scripts/tweet_composer.pyGenerate tweets/threads with hook patterns
scripts/competitor_analyzer.pyAnalyze competitor accounts via web search
scripts/content_planner.pyGenerate weekly/monthly content calendars
scripts/growth_tracker.pyTrack follower growth and engagement trends

Common Pitfalls

  1. Posting links directly — Always put links in the first reply, never in the tweet body
  2. Thread tweet 1 is weak — If the hook doesn't stop scrolling, nothing else matters
  3. Inconsistent posting — Algorithm rewards daily consistency over occasional bangers
  4. Only broadcasting — Replies and engagement are 50%+ of growth, not just posting
  5. Generic bio — "Helping people do things" tells nobody anything
  6. Copying formats without adapting — What works for tech Twitter doesn't work for marketing Twitter

Related Skills

  • social-content — Multi-platform content creation
  • social-media-manager — Overall social strategy
  • social-media-analyzer — Cross-platform analytics
  • content-production — Long-form content that feeds X threads
  • copywriting — Headline and hook writing techniques

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する