本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

site-visit-report

Prepare a sourced site-visit record separating direct observations, participant reports, interpretations, limitations and proposed follow-ups.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md4.3 KB
  • host-contract.json1.5 KB
  • README.md159 B
  • templates/site-visit-report.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

/as:site-visit-report

Before acting, read the host contract, this component's declaration (skill:site-visit-report), and applicable workspace semantics. Load only the required modes from the shared catalog.

<!-- architecture-studio:harness-compatibility -->

Use the host adapter and available native tools or ordinary task-specific code. Apply the receive-owned semantic document rules directly; no installed library, nested skill invocation, runner or executable reconstruction is required. Resolve context before durable work. Existing exact authorization persists; ask only for material missing information or missing permission.

Own authored event documents of kind site-visit. Use the site template. Keep direct observations, participant-reported information, interpretations, issues and proposed actions separate; give stable item labels. Record participants, date, visit scope and access/visibility/weather/testing/equipment/document limits. Inaccessible or concealed work is Not observed, never no issue observed. Do not fabricate photo identity, location, dates or certainty about concealed conditions.

Resolve the project and authorized notes/photos. Distinguish visit, source and created dates. Inspect available photos before describing their content; a filename or caption alone is not visual evidence. Link registered attachments by ID and actual resolved path. This record does not certify code, life-safety, structural, MEP, accessibility, environmental or contractual compliance; route substantive conclusions to the relevant specialist/professional workflow.

Before changing records

Before persistent changes, follow the native mutation sequence: Inspect → Prepare → Verify preparation → Apply → Verify result → Complete. Inspect pending work first. Finish and verify preparation before the first canonical write: separately reread every saved original and prepared file, check its complete actual bytes, establish durable saving, and inspect actual permissions, ownership and ACLs. Merely writing recovery files does not finish verification. Apply only that verified set. Mark complete only after fresh readback validates the entire affected result and its relationships. Read-only requests and inline drafts need no publication sequence.

Saving a report affects the complete site-visit document plus DOCUMENTS.csv and any explicitly authorized attachment registrations. Prepare and verify that full set before writing the first member. Notes/photos remain source read guards; no project-fact, task or decision promotion belongs to this publication set.

Prepare the report, then resolve confirmed coordinates and register through documents.register, kind site-visit. An explicit revision is a new document with supersedes; preserve old bytes. For client/authority-facing or regulated-conclusion reports, apply the existing disclaimer procedure when applicable, including the required terminal <!-- architecture-studio:requires-disclaimer --> marker; do not invent a universal disclaimer for an internal administrative draft.

Reopen the actual report and inspect requested presentation. Only after saving, offer selected project-fact/decision/task promotions with exact item IDs. Report approval alone is not promotion approval. Keep observations, reports and interpretations in their original epistemic category. No silent mutation of PROJECT.md, TASKS.csv or decision records.

site_visit.prepare means the authored preparation procedure above; it may produce an inline draft without a workspace write. Persistence uses the shared native document contract, restricted here to kind site-visit and authorized attachments. A saved record does not authorize its proposed actions or promote facts/decisions automatically.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

agreement

無料

Maintain sourced agreement context and scope in PROJECT.md, cite registered contracts/proposals, and record amendments without imposing a commercial workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects3772026年10月6日 更新

Explain US architecture professional-practice terms, phases, deliverables, roles, delivery methods, AIA contract families, CSI documentation systems, or NCS at a high level. Use for questions such as “what is a CD set?” or “what does 50% CDs mean?”; do not use for code/jurisdiction, outline-spec, agreement-scope, or work-plan work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects3772026年10月6日 更新

Create an HTML color palette from a mood, description, or image, with swatches, color codes, pairings, and contrast checks. Use for color schemes or brand colors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects3772026年10月6日 更新

Export a project's FF&E product-library CSV as dealer-system SIF. Use to produce a .sif schedule; use sif-to-csv for the reverse direction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects3772026年10月6日 更新

Research population, income, age, housing, and employment around a site. Use for census, demographic, or local-market questions tied to a location.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects3772026年10月6日 更新

Extract countable FF&E or luminaire instances from supplied drawings with position-level evidence. Use for plan quantities or symbol counts; not area takeoffs, product specs or cross-source reconciliation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects3772026年10月6日 更新

AlpacaLabsLLC のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する