Maintain sourced agreement context and scope in PROJECT.md, cite registered contracts/proposals, and record amendments without imposing a commercial workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare a user-reviewed Arch Studio bug report or feature request for GitHub. Use when the user runs /as:studio-feedback, says "report a bug", "this skill broke", "send feedback", or requests a feature. Do not use for Claude Code's native /feedback command.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Before acting, read the host contract and this component's declaration (skill:studio-feedback). Load only its referenced mode profiles from the shared catalog. Compose modes required by the actual task; declarations are requirements, not proof of access or permission.
Host adapter: read delivery-specific guidance for invocation, metadata access, questions and browser opening.
This native report-preparation procedure has no registered operation IDs. Its steps below are the complete owner; no Arch Studio runner, installer, executable download or reconstructed helper is required. An ordinary native encoding or metadata tool may be used where available. Follow the completion contract and distinguish a prepared draft, an opened URL and a submitted issue.
Prepare a report locally, show exactly what would leave the machine, and open GitHub only after one informed confirmation. Never submit the issue, post a comment, call the GitHub API, or transmit diagnostics in the background.
Infer bug or feature when the request is clear. Otherwise use one AskUserQuestion gate to choose the type; do not first ask the same question in prose.
Use these issue forms and labels:
bug-report.yml, label bug; fields version, os, skill, what-happened, expected.feature-request.yml, label enhancement; fields version, skill, problem, proposal.For MCP, use the actual delivered release version and digest when present; a connection does not imply a local plugin path. For an installed plugin, read its actual .codex-plugin/plugin.json on Codex or .claude-plugin/plugin.json on Claude Code through the host's known package location. Gather only the operating-system name/version through available native host metadata or a bounded local command. Process access is optional and depends on that method. If metadata is unavailable, say unknown rather than searching unrelated files, installing tools or inventing it. Infer the affected skill from the conversation when reliable; otherwise leave it blank or ask during editing.
Draft the report from the user's words, but do not automatically include raw conversation history, files, stack traces, environment variables, or command output. Before showing the draft, remove or visibly flag:
When uncertain, omit the value and mark where the user can add a safe description. Never invent reproduction details.
Present every proposed query field verbatim in one fenced text block. Explain immediately before the gate:
Opening GitHub sends the displayed fields immediately as URL query parameters, and the URL may remain in browser history. GitHub receives them before issue submission; closing the tab does not undo that transmission. Arch Studio will not submit the issue.
Use a single confirmation gate with these outcomes:
Do not ask for confirmation in prose and then repeat it with AskUserQuestion. Editing returns to the same preview and gate. Cancel ends with no browser action or network request.
Build the URL from https://github.com/AlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects/issues/new, the selected template, title, label, and the form field IDs above. Encode each query value independently as UTF-8 percent encoding: retain only ASCII letters/digits and -._~, encode every other byte as %HH, then join key/value pairs with &. A native URL API or ordinary task-specific code may do this. Decode each encoded value locally and compare it with the exact approved text before opening; do not double-encode or interpolate report text into shell code. No particular encoding executable is required.
Keep the final URL at or below 6,000 characters. Reduce only the narrative fields, state visibly that they were shortened for the URL, and retain the complete draft locally in the conversation for optional manual pasting. Never shorten version, operating system, or affected skill.
If shortening or any other edit changes a displayed value after confirmation, return the exact revised outbound values to the same preview and informed gate before opening. Earlier approval does not cover a changed payload. Prefer doing encoding and length checks locally before the gate so the user reviews the final values once.
After the confirmed URL is built:
open command is one possible method.Only after observing the browser action, say: "GitHub is open with the displayed fields. Review and edit the issue before choosing Submit on GitHub."
gh issue create.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Maintain sourced agreement context and scope in PROJECT.md, cite registered contracts/proposals, and record amendments without imposing a commercial workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain US architecture professional-practice terms, phases, deliverables, roles, delivery methods, AIA contract families, CSI documentation systems, or NCS at a high level. Use for questions such as “what is a CD set?” or “what does 50% CDs mean?”; do not use for code/jurisdiction, outline-spec, agreement-scope, or work-plan work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create an HTML color palette from a mood, description, or image, with swatches, color codes, pairings, and contrast checks. Use for color schemes or brand colors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Export a project's FF&E product-library CSV as dealer-system SIF. Use to produce a .sif schedule; use sif-to-csv for the reverse direction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research population, income, age, housing, and employment around a site. Use for census, demographic, or local-market questions tied to a location.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract countable FF&E or luminaire instances from supplied drawings with position-level evidence. Use for plan quantities or symbol counts; not area takeoffs, product specs or cross-source reconciliation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。