Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Spin up a background agent to do the research, so you keep working while it reads.
Its job:
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Create and maintain AGENTS.md files for project onboarding and grounding. Use when initialized in a new project, when project structure changes significantly, or when creating subfolder-level AGENTS.md files for complex monorepos.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and update an arbitrary codebase to follow the Code.mil federal open-source licensing model (MIT with 17 U.S.C. Section 105 disclaimers and INTENT.md), including CRAN/R package DESCRIPTION setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes - Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads Copilot conversation history and extracts executive-ready success stories. Use when the user asks to study prior Copilot sessions, summarize what was done before, mine evidence, or quantify time, cost, risk, and priority alignment from GitHub Copilot history in any workspace or repository.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive investigation of complex multi-domain narratives (technology, theology, policy, finance). Systematically decouples factual claims from speculation through iterative verification, multi-source comparison, and contradiction resolution. Use for investigations requiring institutional knowledge, historical context, and handling of conflicting incentives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。