本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

review

Review a vendor agreement, NDA, or SaaS subscription against your playbook. Identifies the agreement structure from titles, routes to the right review skill (vendor-agreement-review, nda-review, saas-msa-review), and integrates the output into a single memo. Use when the user says "review this contract", "check this MSA", "is this NDA okay", "look at this SaaS agreement", or attaches an inbound agreement for review.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

/review

Reviews an inbound agreement against the playbook in ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/commercial-legal/CLAUDE.md. Identifies the agreement structure from titles, selects the appropriate skill(s), and — if confirm_routing is enabled — checks with the user before proceeding.

Instructions

  1. Load ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/commercial-legal/CLAUDE.md. If placeholders present, stop and prompt: "Run /commercial-legal:cold-start-interview first — I need to learn your playbook before I can review against it."

    Also read ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/commercial-legal/CLAUDE.md → ## Review preferences → confirm_routing. If the field is missing, treat it as true.

  2. Get the agreement: From file path, Drive link, [CLM ID], or pasted text. If none provided, ask.

  3. Read the document structure — titles first.

    Before reading the body, extract:

    • The main agreement title (e.g., "Master Services Agreement", "Non-Disclosure Agreement")
    • All exhibit, schedule, addendum, and attachment titles (e.g., "Exhibit A — Data Processing Addendum", "Schedule 1 — Subscription Order Form", "Annex B — Service Level Agreement")

    This is the routing signal. Do not rely on body keywords alone — a 40-page MSA with "confidential" throughout is not an NDA.

  4. Select the skill(s) based on document structure.

    Map each identified document or section to a skill:

    Document / section title containsSkill
    Non-Disclosure, NDA, Confidentiality Agreement (as the main agreement)nda-review
    Master Services Agreement, Professional Services, Statement of Work, Consulting Agreementvendor-agreement-review
    Subscription, SaaS, Cloud Services, Order Form with auto-renewal, Software License with recurring feessaas-msa-review (overlay on vendor-agreement-review)
    Data Processing Addendum, DPA, Data Processing Agreement (as exhibit or standalone)note for vendor-agreement-review → data protection section
    Service Level Agreement, SLA (as exhibit)note for saas-msa-review → SLA section

    Multiple skills may apply. Common combinations:

    • MSA + DPA exhibit → vendor-agreement-review, with DPA noted
    • SaaS subscription + Order Form + SLA exhibit → saas-msa-review (covers all three)
    • MSA + Order Form with auto-renewal → vendor-agreement-review + saas-msa-review overlay

    When the structure is genuinely ambiguous after reading titles (e.g., a document titled "Agreement" with no exhibits listed), read the first two pages of the body to resolve it — then stop and route.

  5. Confirm routing if enabled.

    If confirm_routing is true in ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/commercial-legal/CLAUDE.md (or field is absent):

    I'm going to review this as: [agreement type(s)].
    
    Documents identified:
    - [Main agreement title] → [skill]
    - [Exhibit A title] → [how it will be handled]
    - [Exhibit B title] → [how it will be handled]
    
    Sound right? (yes / no — or tell me what I got wrong)
    

    Wait for confirmation before proceeding. If the user corrects the routing, apply their instruction and proceed.

    If confirm_routing is false: proceed silently. Log the routing decision at the top of the review memo so the user can see what was applied.

  6. Run the skill(s). Follow each skill's workflow fully. If multiple skills apply, run them in sequence and integrate the output into a single memo — don't produce separate memos.

  7. Check for escalations: If any issue exceeds the reviewer's authority per the ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/commercial-legal/CLAUDE.md matrix, invoke escalation-flagger to route and draft the ask.

  8. Offer follow-ups:

    • Stakeholder summary for the business owner
    • Redline .docx with tracked changes
    • [CLM] record creation (if connected)
    • Add to renewal register (if auto-renewal found)

Configuring confirm_routing

Add to ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/commercial-legal/CLAUDE.md → ## Review preferences:

## Review preferences

confirm_routing: true   # Set to false to skip routing confirmation and proceed automatically

The cold-start interview should ask about this preference. Default is true — confirmation on. As trust builds, the user can set it to false.

Examples

/commercial-legal:review vendor-msa.pdf
/commercial-legal:review https://drive.google.com/file/d/ABC123
/commercial-legal:review
[paste agreement text]

Output

Full review memo per the skill's format. Routing decision logged at the top. Deviation-by-deviation, specific redline language, named approver. Saved where ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/commercial-legal/CLAUDE.md → House style says work product goes.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

EU AI Act per-system inventory — track each AI system's role (provider, deployer, importer, distributor, authorized representative, product manufacturer) and risk tier (prohibited, high-risk, limited, minimal, GPAI, GPAI+systemic). Role and tier are assessed per system, not per company. Use when the user says "ai inventory", "add an ai system", "what systems do we have", "classify this ai system", "eu ai act register", or "ai system registry".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/claude-for-legal9,6542026年9月30日 更新

Detects when Luminance, Kira, or a similar bulk-review tool is in use, hands off the high-volume clause extraction to it, and QAs its output per the trust level in `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/corporate-legal/CLAUDE.md`. Use when user says "send to Luminance", "bulk review", "AI extraction", or when diligence-issue-extraction hits a high-volume category.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/claude-for-legal9,6542026年9月30日 更新

Run an AI impact assessment — structured intake, risk analysis, regulatory classification per regime in scope, policy consistency diff, and recommendation with conditions. Uses the house-style structure learned from the seed impact assessment in `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/ai-governance-legal/CLAUDE.md`. Use when user says "impact assessment for", "assess this AI use case", "run an AIA", "generate an AIA", "we need to document this AI system", "AI risk assessment for X", or follows a conditional triage result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/claude-for-legal9,6542026年9月30日 更新

Trace how a contract has changed across its base agreement and all amendments — either a summary of all changes over time, or a provision trace for a specific clause. Use when the user says "what changed in this contract over time", "show me the amendment history", "where's the latest [clause]", "how has [provision] evolved", or uploads multiple versions of an agreement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/claude-for-legal9,6542026年9月30日 更新

Check installed community skills for updates. Shows a diff and requires explicit approval before applying. Use when the user says "check for updates", "update my skills", "anything new for my installed skills", or when invoked from the registry-sync agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/claude-for-legal9,6542026年9月30日 更新

Bar prep questions — MBE or essay, targeted at your weak subjects and bar jurisdiction. Tracks misses and comes back to patterns. Use when the user says "bar prep", "MBE questions", "practice essay", or "test me for the bar".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/claude-for-legal9,6542026年9月30日 更新

anthropics のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する