本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

config-consistency-checker

Automatically analyzes configuration files to detect inconsistencies, conflicts, missing keys, and divergent values across environments, versions, or modules. Use when managing multi-environment configurations, detecting config drift, validating configuration changes, or ensuring consistency across microservices. Supports JSON, YAML, TOML, INI, XML, .env, and properties files. Identifies security issues like hardcoded secrets and provides actionable resolution guidance.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Config Consistency Checker

Automatically detect inconsistencies, conflicts, and mismatches in configuration files across environments and modules.

Workflow

1. Parse Configuration Files

Read and parse configuration files in various formats:

  • JSON (.json)
  • YAML (.yml, .yaml)
  • TOML (.toml)
  • INI (.ini)
  • XML (.xml)
  • Environment files (.env)
  • Properties files (.properties)

2. Extract Structure

Build configuration structure:

  • Key-value pairs
  • Nested objects/sections
  • Arrays/lists
  • Data types

3. Compare Configurations

Compare across:

  • Environments: dev vs staging vs production
  • Versions: v1 vs v2
  • Modules: service-a vs service-b
  • Templates: actual vs expected

4. Detect Issues

Identify:

  • Missing required keys
  • Conflicting values
  • Type mismatches
  • Divergent settings
  • Deprecated keys
  • Security issues

5. Generate Report

Provide:

  • Detailed inconsistency list
  • Critical issues highlighted
  • Resolution guidance
  • Suggested fixes

Quick Examples

Example 1: Environment Mismatch

dev.json:

{
  "database": {
    "host": "localhost",
    "port": 5432,
    "ssl": false
  }
}

prod.json:

{
  "database": {
    "host": "prod-db.example.com",
    "port": 5432
  }
}

Issues Detected:

  • Missing key: prod.json missing database.ssl
  • Critical: SSL disabled in dev but undefined in prod

Resolution: Add "ssl": true to prod.json

Example 2: Type Mismatch

config-a.yaml:

timeout: 30

config-b.yaml:

timeout: "30"

Issue: Type mismatch (number vs string)

Resolution: Standardize to number: timeout: 30

Example 3: Security Issue

config.env:

DATABASE_PASSWORD=secret123
API_KEY=hardcoded-key-here

Issues:

  • Hardcoded password
  • Hardcoded API key

Resolution: Use environment variables or secrets manager

Detection Patterns

Missing Keys

Compare key sets across configs:

Config A keys: {host, port, ssl}
Config B keys: {host, port}
Missing in B: {ssl}

Conflicting Values

Same key, different values:

dev.timeout = 30
prod.timeout = 60
→ Divergent (may be intentional)

Type Mismatches

Same key, different types:

config-a.port = 8080 (number)
config-b.port = "8080" (string)
→ Type inconsistency

Security Issues

Detect patterns:

  • password, secret, key with hardcoded values
  • Weak settings: ssl: false, debug: true in production
  • Exposed credentials

Report Format

Configuration Consistency Report
================================

Files Analyzed:
- dev.json
- staging.json
- prod.json

Summary:
- Total Issues: 5
- Critical: 2
- Warnings: 3

Critical Issues:
1. Missing Key: prod.json missing 'database.ssl'
   Impact: SSL may be disabled in production
   Resolution: Add "ssl": true to prod.json

2. Security Issue: Hardcoded password in dev.json
   Impact: Credentials exposed in config file
   Resolution: Use environment variable ${DB_PASSWORD}

Warnings:
3. Type Mismatch: timeout is number in dev, string in staging
   Resolution: Standardize to number type

4. Divergent Value: max_connections differs (dev:10, prod:100)
   Note: May be intentional for different environments

5. Deprecated Key: 'legacy_mode' is deprecated
   Resolution: Remove or migrate to new setting

Best Practices

  • Environment-specific values: Document intentional differences
  • Type consistency: Use same types across environments
  • Required keys: Define and validate required configuration
  • Security: Never hardcode secrets
  • Validation: Use schemas to enforce structure
  • Documentation: Comment why values differ

Common Scenarios

Multi-Environment Setup

Compare dev, staging, prod configs to ensure consistency while allowing intentional differences.

Microservices

Validate that shared configuration keys are consistent across services.

Configuration Migration

Detect missing or changed keys when upgrading configuration versions.

Security Audit

Scan for hardcoded secrets and insecure settings.

Tips

  • Start with critical keys (database, security settings)
  • Document intentional differences
  • Use configuration schemas for validation
  • Automate checks in CI/CD pipeline
  • Review security issues immediately

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Applies abstract interpretation using different abstract domains (intervals, octagons, polyhedra, sign, congruence) to statically analyze program variables and infer invariants, value ranges, and relationships. Use when analyzing program properties, inferring loop invariants, detecting potential errors, or understanding variable relationships through static analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE2532026年8月21日 更新

Uses abstract interpretation to automatically infer loop invariants, function preconditions, and postconditions for formal verification. Generates invariants that capture program behavior and support correctness proofs in Dafny, Isabelle, Coq, and other verification systems. Use when adding formal specifications to code, generating verification conditions, inferring contracts for functions, or discovering loop invariants for proofs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE2532026年8月21日 更新

Performs abstract interpretation over source code to infer possible program states, variable ranges, and data properties without executing the program. Reports potential runtime errors including out-of-bounds accesses, null dereferences, type inconsistencies, division by zero, and integer overflows. Use when analyzing code for potential runtime errors, performing static analysis, checking safety properties, or verifying program behavior without execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE2532026年8月21日 更新

Performs abstract interpretation to produce summarized execution traces and high-level program behavior representations. Highlights key control flow paths, variable relationships, loop invariants, function summaries, and potential runtime states using abstract domains (intervals, signs, nullness, etc.). Use when analyzing program behavior, understanding execution paths, computing loop invariants, tracking variable ranges, detecting potential runtime errors, or generating program summaries without concrete execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE2532026年8月21日 更新

Create ACSL (ANSI/ISO C Specification Language) formal annotations for C/C++ programs. Use this skill when working with formal verification, adding function contracts (requires/ensures), loop invariants, assertions, memory safety annotations, or any ACSL specifications. Supports Frama-C verification and generates comprehensive formal specifications for C/C++ code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE2532026年8月21日 更新

CLI-based browser automation with persistent page state using ref-based element interaction. Use when users ask to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE2532026年8月21日 更新

ArabelaTso のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する