本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

vibe-requirements-validator

Validates PRD, user stories, or feature requirements against SMART criteria. Use when reviewing requirements to catch vagueness before it causes expensive rework.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

vibe-requirements-validator

Vague requirements cause expensive rework. Catch them early.

When to Use This Skill

  • Reviewing a PRD or feature spec before implementation
  • Writing acceptance criteria for user stories
  • When you notice requirements like "make it fast" or "improve UX"
  • Before estimating effort for a feature

When NOT to Use This Skill

  • Internal technical tasks with clear scope
  • Bug fixes (the bug IS the requirement)
  • When requirements are already validated and approved

SMART Criteria

Score each requirement 1-5 on:

  • Specific — Is it clear what exactly needs to be built? (Not "improve performance" but "reduce P95 latency to <200ms")
  • Measurable — Can you objectively verify it's done? (Not "users like it" but "NPS score >40")
  • Achievable — Can it be built with available resources and constraints?
  • Relevant — Does it align with project goals and user needs?
  • Time-bound — Is there a clear scope boundary? (Not "eventually" but "in v1.0")

Steps

  1. List all requirements from the document

  2. Score each on SMART (1-5 per dimension)

  3. Flag issues:

    • Score < 3 on any dimension → needs revision
    • Measurability < 3 → most common failure, flag prominently
    • Near-duplicates → consolidate
    • Positioning statements masquerading as requirements → remove
  4. Report:

Output Format

Requirements Validation: [Document Name]

Total Requirements: X Passing (avg >= 3.5): Y (Z%) Flagged: W

IDRequirementSMARTAvgIssue
FR-1"..."425433.6Low measurability

Top Issues

  1. Measurability crisis — X requirements have M < 3
  2. Near-duplicates — [list pairs]
  3. Not requirements — [positioning statements]

Recommended Revisions

IDCurrentSuggested
FR-3"Improve load time""Reduce initial page load to <2s on 3G"

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Validates completed work against defined acceptance criteria. Use after completing a task that has specific success criteria defined in issues, specs, or task descriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ash1794/vibe-engineering1642026年10月8日 更新

Generates edge case, failure mode, and spec-driven test cases. Covers boundary values, nil inputs, concurrency, resource exhaustion, malformed data, and requirement-linked traceability tests. Use after happy-path tests exist and before claiming coverage is complete, when requirements lack tests, or before a security review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ash1794/vibe-engineering1642026年10月8日 更新

Catches shortcuts and reward hacking — weakening or deleting tests to make them pass, hard-coding expected outputs, silently dropping requirements, or claiming work is done without running it. Use before declaring a task complete and whenever a test or requirement feels like it's in the way.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ash1794/vibe-engineering1642026年10月8日 更新

Safely integrates commits from parallel agent branches using sequential cherry-pick. Use after parallel work completes in isolated branches or worktrees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ash1794/vibe-engineering1642026年10月8日 更新

Audits tests for concurrency safety — race conditions, shared mock state, cleanup ordering. Use when writing tests that involve goroutines, async operations, or shared mutable state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ash1794/vibe-engineering1642026年10月8日 更新

Enforces tiered test coverage standards with three dimensions — line coverage by tier, spec-to-test traceability, and spec-to-code implementation mapping. Use before claiming code is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ash1794/vibe-engineering1642026年10月8日 更新

ash1794 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する