本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

agent-expenditure

Tracks per-agent token usage and flags waste in parallel dispatch. Use when evaluating parallel agent efficiency or after a multi-agent run.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md2.7 KB
  • modules/waste-signals.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Agent Token Waste Monitoring

When To Use

  • After parallel agent dispatch completes
  • When evaluating whether to increase agent count
  • During retrospectives on agent-heavy workflows
  • When plan-before-large-dispatch rule triggers

When NOT To Use

  • Single-agent workflows (no coordination overhead)
  • During active agent execution (post-hoc analysis)
  • For token budgeting (use token-conservation instead)

Brooks's Law for Agents

Dispatching more agents does not always help. Coordination overhead grows with agent count:

Agent CountExpected OverheadGuidance
1-3NegligibleDispatch freely
4-510-15%Acceptable; plan first
6-820-30%Monitor closely
9+30%+Likely counterproductive

Coordination overhead is measured as shared-file conflicts: concurrent Read/Write operations on the same file by different agents, as a percentage of total agent runtime.

Post-Dispatch Review Checklist

After parallel agent runs, evaluate:

  1. Did each agent produce unique findings?
  2. Was total token expenditure proportional to value?
  3. Did any agent duplicate another's work?
  4. Would fewer agents have produced the same result?

If 2+ questions answer no, reduce agent count in future dispatches of the same type.

Waste Signals

See modules/waste-signals.md for the 5 waste signal categories and detection criteria.

Cross-References

  • Dispatching 4 or more agents needs an agreed plan first: the roster, each agent's scope, and the output contract it returns. 1-3 agents may dispatch directly.
  • conserve:token-conservation for session-level token budgeting
  • conjure:agent-teams for dispatch coordination

Exit Criteria

  • All 4 post-dispatch review questions answered with explicit yes/no per agent (unique findings, proportional expenditure, no duplication, fewer agents sufficient)
  • Waste signals from modules/waste-signals.md checked against the completed run; any triggered signal named with the category
  • A recommendation is produced: either "reduce agent count to N" or "dispatch was efficient" with coordination overhead percentage
  • If 2+ review questions answer no, a concrete agent-count reduction is stated for future dispatches of the same type

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Shapes turns action-first: action leads, steps numbered, state restated. Use for ADHD-friendly output. Do not use to trim tokens; use response-compression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

athola/claude-night-market3412026年10月10日 更新

Inverts burden of proof for code additions. Use when reviewing PRs, planning refactors, or running unbloat to challenge every addition's necessity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

athola/claude-night-market3412026年10月10日 更新

Coordinates Claude agent teams via filesystem protocol. Use when orchestrating parallel agents with task dependencies. Do not use for single-agent tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

athola/claude-night-market3412026年10月10日 更新

Evaluates API surface design, consistency, and exemplar alignment. Use when reviewing public API changes or before releasing a new API surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

athola/claude-night-market3412026年10月10日 更新

Selects architecture paradigm via research before scaffolding. Use when architecture is undecided and the choice needs justification and documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

athola/claude-night-market3412026年10月10日 更新

Generates a Mermaid architecture diagram showing high-level component relationships. Use when visualizing how plugins or modules fit together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

athola/claude-night-market3412026年10月10日 更新

athola のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する