本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

migration-ready-schema

Data-model rules that make a schema importable from day one, so the migration-import-engineer is never blocked on missing columns. Every SMB Product-Builder product must let a customer bring their data from an incumbent (ServiceTitan/Toast/Mindbody/Shopify) — that requires provenance (source_ref) and rollback (import_batch_id) on importable entities, and modelling real-world actors as entities rather than inline fields. Applied by architect when writing the data model in ARCH-{slug}.md, and checked by migration-import-engineer. One cheap rule set prevents the migration↔architecture seam gap from recurring across all 40 products.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Migration-ready schema — importable from day one

Every SMB product's wedge is low switching cost — the customer brings their data from the incumbent. If the schema can't receive that data idempotently and reversibly, the migration-import-engineer blocks and the wedge is a slogan. These rules are cheap at design time and impossible to retrofit cleanly. Apply them to the data model in ARCH, before any import is designed.

The three rules (the ones that actually block imports)

1. Importable entities carry source_ref (provenance)

Any entity that can be populated from an incumbent export or a third-party sync gets a nullable, unique source_ref column:

source_ref  text  UNIQUE NULL   -- e.g. "servicetitan:pricebook:8842"
  • It is the dedup key for idempotent re-import (re-running an export never duplicates).
  • Namespaced {source}:{type}:{id} so two incumbents can't collide.
  • Nullable because natively-created rows have no source.

2. Importable entities carry import_batch_id (rollback)

import_batch_id  uuid  NULL  -- tags every row written by one import run

Rollback = delete where import_batch_id = ?. Without it there is no undo, and an import with no undo is one a user will never trust enough to run.

3. Model real-world actors as entities, not inline fields

A customer, contact, vendor, member, or tenant is an entity with its own table, even if v1 only stores a name + phone. Reason: imports populate these before the dependent records (quotes, orders, bookings) exist — an inline customer_name field on Quote has nowhere to land an imported customer. Inline-actor is the single most common migration blocker.

-- WRONG (blocks import):  Quote(... customer_contact text)
-- RIGHT:                   CustomerContact(id, ..., source_ref, import_batch_id)
                            Quote(... customer_contact_id → CustomerContact.id)

Supporting rules (cheap, prevent silent data loss)

  • Money in integer minor units (*_cents), never float — incumbent exports carry exact amounts; floats corrupt them.
  • Timestamps carry the source timezone (store UTC + offset, or tz-aware) — exports use local times; ambiguous MM/DD and naive datetimes lose data.
  • Infra tables for integration bookkeeping exist in the model: outbound_message (idempotent send guard), processed_webhook_events (event dedup). The integrations-engineer relies on them; enumerate them so they aren't a surprise.

Checklist (architect runs this before finalizing the data model)

For each entity in the data model:
- [ ] Can it be imported from an incumbent or third-party? If yes → has source_ref + import_batch_id
- [ ] Is it a real-world actor (customer/contact/vendor/member)? If yes → it is its own entity, not an inline field
- [ ] Money fields integer minor units? Timestamps tz-aware?
- [ ] Listed the infra tables (outbound_message, processed_webhook_events) the integrations layer needs?

A data model that passes this checklist hands migration-import-engineer a destination it can import into idempotently and reversibly — no blocked seam.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

great_cto's own committed aesthetic — the instrument panel. Dark five-step surface ladder, exactly one accent, two faces divided by MEANING (Geist speaks, Geist Mono is machine-truth), tabular numerals, and a dash that is not a nought. Twelve checkable rules measured from packages/board and greatcto.systems, not designed for this file. Use when building or extending any great_cto surface — the board, the site, a report, a share page.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

avelikiy/great_cto1032026年10月12日 更新

Catalogue of known SDLC anti-patterns that great_cto agents must actively reject when reviewing architecture, plans, code, or post-mortems. Used by architect (pre-impl), pm (planning), senior-dev (impl), l3-support (post-incident).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

avelikiy/great_cto1032026年10月12日 更新

anydesign

無料

Analyze images, websites, and Figma files to extract their design and generate a `design.md` with token system, component inventory, and reconstruction notes. Use this skill whenever the user wants to understand, document, replicate, or audit the design of something visual: a screenshot, a URL, a Figma link, a Pinterest reference, a mockup, a competitor's site, a component, a dashboard, a landing page. Also when they ask 'extract the design system from X', 'document the style of Y', 'analyze this visually', 'convert this image into tokens', 'help me replicate this design', 'what palette does this site use', 'how is this built'. Also for single elements: 'copy this navbar', 'recreate this illustration', 'give me a prompt to regenerate this graphic' — element mode outputs a focused element.md, with token-grounded image-model prompts when the element is visual art. If the user brings any visual source and wants to understand it at a design level — this skill should activate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

avelikiy/great_cto1032026年10月12日 更新

Shared review framework that every domain reviewer (pci, oracle, gov, edtech, healthcare, mlops, etc.) MUST follow. Defines the output artifact (TM-{slug}.md), mandatory sections, severity scale, verdict format, the workflow scaffold (when-invoked, Step-0 read-inputs, HANDOFF), and the "domain heuristic vs generic check" boundary. Eliminates duplication across the ~30 reviewer prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

avelikiy/great_cto1032026年10月12日 更新

Structured idea generation + multi-LLM debate for the product-owner stage. Diverge (generate genuinely different bets), debate (a 4-persona panel on 4 models argues over 2 rounds), converge (synthesize a recommendation). Used by product-owner before architect; available to architect for design-space exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

avelikiy/great_cto1032026年10月12日 更新

Run the great_cto controlled Codex lifecycle with controller-owned writes, verifier evidence, human gates and optional artifact release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

avelikiy/great_cto1032026年10月12日 更新

avelikiy のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する