本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

auditor-interview-prep

Use this skill when process owners, engineers or executives will be interviewed in an external or internal audit and need to be ready, or when someone asks "prepare the team for the auditor interviews", "what will the auditor ask our CTO", "interview briefing for the audit", "how should people answer the auditor", "mock audit interviews" or "our engineers are nervous about the audit". Builds a one-page brief per role: what the auditor is likely to ask, the records that person should be able to open, the honest way to answer what they do not know, and a short mock interview, plus an interview schedule with the evidence each session needs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Use this one to three weeks before an audit, once the audit plan or agenda is known. You get a new folder, ./auditor-interview-prep/, holding a one-to-two-page briefing note for each person the auditor will interview, with the likely questions, the records they should open and how to answer (briefs/<role>.md, one per role), and a timetable of the interview sessions with topics, backups and the coordinator (schedule.md). This skill drafts for a human to review and sign; this skill never marks a control effective. The aim is people who can show what they do, not people who recite policy.

Inputs to gather

Read the audit plan or agenda, the control list or applicability statement with owners, the policies and procedures each role is named in, the last audit report and its findings, and the evidence folder. Ask the reader in one message: which roles the auditor has asked to meet, who is new in their role, which areas had findings before, and who coordinates on the audit day.

Step 1: map roles to what the auditor will test

For each interviewee role, list the processes they own or operate, the controls mapped to them, the risks they own, and any open finding in their area. Leadership gets questions on direction, resources, risk decisions and management review, and each executive should be able to name one decision from the last review and what changed because of it; process owners on how their process runs and how they know it works; engineers and operators on the real steps, the last time they did them and where the record is.

Step 2: write the likely questions

Write 8 to 12 questions per role, in the auditor's style: open, about the last real occurrence, and followed by "show me". Put the audit period at the top of every brief; the last occurrence the person names must fall inside the window the auditor samples from, or they should know why there was none. Examples: "Walk me through the last person who left. Show me when their access was removed." "How do you decide whether a change needs approval? Show me an emergency change from this period." "What did leadership decide at the last review, and what happened next?" For framework-specific topics a role must speak to, run a framework lookup on what the auditor is likely to probe rather than inventing it.

Step 3: list the records each person opens

For each question, name the record that answers it and where it lives, and have the person open it once before the audit. An interviewee who can open the right ticket in thirty seconds needs fewer words than one who describes the process from memory.

Step 4: brief on how to answer

Every brief carries the same guidance:

  • Answer the question asked, then stop. Long answers open new lines of questioning.
  • Show the record instead of describing it.
  • When you do not know: say so, say who knows or where it is recorded, and offer to come back. A guess that contradicts a record is worse than "I will check".
  • When practice differs from the document, say what you actually do. The auditor will find the difference anyway; candour turns a possible finding into a conversation.
  • Do not speculate about other teams' processes.
  • Never create, backdate or tidy a record for the audit. A missing record is a finding to manage; a fabricated one ends trust in everything else.
  • If a finding is raised, ask what evidence the auditor saw; do not argue in the interview. Disputes go to the audit coordinator.

Step 5: run a short mock interview

For each role, script a 15-minute mock with four questions from the brief, asked by someone outside the person's team, and for an internal audit never by someone who runs the process being tested. Note where the person could not find a record or contradicted a document; those are items to fix before the audit, in the process or in the document, not in the script.

Step 6: build the schedule

The interview timetable (schedule.md) lists each session: role, time, topics, records to have open, the backup person if the interviewee is absent, and the coordinator who tracks auditor requests made during the session. The coordinator keeps a written request log (request, owner, due time) and reviews it at the end of each audit day; "can you send me that later" is the item most often lost.

What good looks like

  • Interviewees speak about the last real occurrence and open the record without help. That is what convinces an auditor.
  • The common mistake is coaching people to recite policy wording or memorise answers. The tell: answers sound identical across roles, and the first "show me" stalls the interview.
  • The briefs surface real gaps before the audit; a mock that finds nothing usually was too gentle.
  • "I do not know, here is who does" is treated as a good answer, and people know that.
  • New joiners and backup staff are briefed too; auditors often ask for whoever is available.

Framework lookups

If ISMS Copilot is connected to your agent (MCP server https://account.ismscopilot.com/v1/account/mcp), ask it the framework question with create_conversation (mode think, answer_format: decision) and keep one conversation for this task. Send only a short question in your own words, show it to the user first, and never include file contents, secrets, personal data or evidence. If it is not connected, check the official text of the framework yourself; this skill does not restate it. Set it up: https://www.ismscopilot.com/mcp?ref=grcskills-auditor-interview-prep

Rules

  • MUST tie every likely question to a record the interviewee can open.
  • MUST include the guidance on answering honestly when the person does not know.
  • MUST write outputs only inside ./auditor-interview-prep/ and ask before overwriting an existing file.
  • NEVER script answers that misstate practice, or coach anyone to hide a gap from the auditor.
  • NEVER name individuals in the briefs; use roles.
  • NEVER send briefs or invitations to staff; the reader distributes them.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Use this skill when a company needs rules for how staff use company systems, data, devices and AI tools, or asks "write our acceptable use policy", "AUP for employees", "can staff use ChatGPT at work", "AI usage policy", "BYOD rules", "remote work security rules" or "a policy people will actually read". Finds how people really work (devices, apps, AI tools, travel), puts the choices to the reader as decisions, drafts a short plain-language policy with concrete do and do not examples, and adds a comprehension check and an acknowledgement text for onboarding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

better-isms/grcskills102026年10月20日 更新

Use this skill when a periodic user access review is due, an auditor asked for access review evidence, or someone says "prepare the access review", "run the quarterly user recertification", "who still has admin", "check leavers still have access", "build the access review sheets for managers" or "our last review was a rubber stamp". Picks the systems in scope, builds account populations reconciled against HR, pre-flags leavers, orphans, shared and dormant accounts, assigns independent reviewers, defines the decisions to record, and plans the removal follow-up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

better-isms/grcskills102026年10月20日 更新

Use this skill when staff already use AI assistants, coding tools or AI features and the company needs rules people will follow, and asks "write our AI usage policy", "can staff use ChatGPT", "generative AI policy", "what data can we put into AI tools", "approved AI tools list", "rules for AI agents and connectors" or "AI literacy for staff". Finds out what people actually use, sets a short list of approved tools with a data traffic light, rules for checking outputs and for agents that act, a fast route to request a new tool, and writes a two-page rule set, the approved tools list and rollout notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

better-isms/grcskills102026年10月20日 更新

Use this skill when a company must work out where each of its AI systems sits under the EU AI Act, and asks "is this high-risk", "classify our AI systems", "AI Act risk tier", "are we a provider or a deployer", "does Annex III apply to us", "is this a prohibited practice", "what does the AI Act mean for our chatbot" or "which AI Act obligations do we have". Tests each system, one at a time, for scope, role, prohibited practices, the two high-risk routes, the narrow exemption, transparency duties and general-purpose models, and writes a reasoned classification record per system plus a summary table of resulting obligations to confirm with whoever owns legal interpretation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

better-isms/grcskills102026年10月20日 更新

Use this skill when one AI system needs its impact on people and on the company assessed before launch, after a significant change, or because a customer, auditor or regulator asks for it, and the team says "AI impact assessment", "assess the impact of this model", "fundamental rights impact assessment", "who could this AI harm", "bias assessment before launch" or "sign-off for the AI feature". Describes the system in its context, works through impacts on the people it affects with evidence, sizes them, proposes mitigations with measurable triggers, and writes one assessment ready for the system owner and an accountable executive to sign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

better-isms/grcskills102026年10月20日 更新

Use this skill when a company that already runs a security management system wants to add an AI management system, or is preparing for an AI governance certification, and asks "scope our AI management system", "what should the AIMS cover", "AI governance roles", "who owns AI governance", "extend our ISMS to AI" or "write the AI management system scope statement". Decides which AI systems, roles, teams and lifecycle stages are in, maps interfaces and dependencies, reuses the processes the security system already runs, assigns roles with a RACI, and writes the scope statement, the roles file and the open questions for leadership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

better-isms/grcskills102026年10月20日 更新

better-isms のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する