Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
The AAV Vector Design Agent provides AI-driven design of adeno-associated virus vectors for gene therapy applications. It covers capsid selection and engineering, promoter/enhancer design, transgene optimization, and manufacturing considerations.
Capsid Selection: Match AAV serotype to target tissue based on tropism profiles.
Capsid Engineering: Design modified capsids for enhanced transduction or immune evasion.
Promoter Design: Select and optimize tissue-specific or ubiquitous promoters.
Transgene Optimization: Codon optimization and regulatory element design.
Immunogenicity Prediction: Predict NAb binding and T-cell epitopes.
Manufacturing Assessment: Evaluate producibility and purification considerations.
| Serotype | Primary Tropism | Clinical Use |
|---|---|---|
| AAV1 | Muscle, CNS | Glybera (muscle) |
| AAV2 | Broad (liver, muscle) | Luxturna (retina) |
| AAV5 | CNS, liver, retina | Hemgenix (liver) |
| AAV8 | Liver, muscle | Multiple trials |
| AAV9 | CNS, cardiac, liver | Zolgensma (CNS) |
| AAVrh10 | CNS, liver | CNS trials |
| AAVrh74 | Muscle | Elevidys (muscle) |
| AAV-PHP.eB | CNS (mouse) | Research |
Input: Target tissue, therapeutic gene, patient population characteristics.
Capsid Selection: Rank serotypes by tropism profile match.
Capsid Engineering: Design modifications if needed (peptide insertion, point mutations).
Cassette Design: Optimize ITR-to-ITR expression cassette.
Immunogenicity Analysis: Predict NAb prevalence and T-cell epitopes.
Manufacturing Review: Assess production feasibility.
Output: Complete vector design with rationale.
User: "Design an AAV vector for liver-directed gene therapy in hemophilia B with low immunogenicity."
Agent Action:
python3 Skills/Gene_Therapy/AAV_Vector_Design_Agent/aav_designer.py \
--target_tissue liver \
--therapeutic_gene F9 \
--indication hemophilia_b \
--minimize_immunogenicity true \
--nab_escape true \
--promoter liver_specific \
--output aav_design/
5' ITR - [Promoter] - [5' UTR] - [Transgene] - [WPRE] - [PolyA] - 3' ITR
Packaging limit: ~4.7 kb between ITRs
Promoter Options:
| Promoter | Type | Size | Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAG | Ubiquitous | 1.7 kb | Strong expression |
| EF1α | Ubiquitous | 1.2 kb | Constitutive |
| LP1 | Liver-specific | 0.5 kb | Hepatocyte targeting |
| hSyn | Neuron-specific | 0.5 kb | CNS applications |
| MCK | Muscle-specific | 0.6 kb | Myopathies |
| CMV | Ubiquitous | 0.6 kb | High initial (silenced) |
Directed Evolution:
Rational Design:
Machine Learning:
Pre-existing NAbs:
| Serotype | NAb Prevalence |
|---|---|
| AAV2 | 30-60% |
| AAV5 | 15-30% |
| AAV8 | 15-25% |
| AAV9 | 20-35% |
Mitigation Strategies:
Tropism Prediction:
Immunogenicity Modeling:
Expression Optimization:
| Factor | Impact | Optimization |
|---|---|---|
| Capsid yield | Production cost | Sequence modifications |
| Empty/full ratio | Potency | Purification method |
| Aggregation | Stability | Formulation |
| DNA packaging | Transgene size | Cassette design |
AI Group - Biomedical AI Platform
<!-- AUTHOR_SIGNATURE: 9a7f3c2e-MD-BABU-MIA-2026-MSSM-SECURE -->まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow, 연구부터 논문까지, 연구 주제 설정부터 논문 완성까지, 논문 전체 워크플로.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。