Workflow for read alignment, sorting, indexing, mapping statistics, and downstream-ready alignment artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare gene regulatory and co-expression networks between biological conditions to identify rewired regulatory relationships using DiffCorr. Detects gained, lost, and reversed gene-gene correlations between conditions. Use when comparing co-expression networks between disease vs control, treatment conditions, or developmental stages.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Reference examples tested with: matplotlib 3.8+, numpy 1.26+, pandas 2.2+, scipy 1.12+, statsmodels 0.14+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signaturespackageVersion('<pkg>') then ?function_name to verify parametersIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Compare gene co-expression networks between my disease and control groups" → Test whether gene-gene correlations differ significantly between two conditions using Fisher's z-transform, identifying gained, lost, and reversed regulatory relationships.
DiffCorr::comp.2.cc.fdr() for differential correlation analysisscipy.stats and statsmodels for FDR correctionCompare co-expression and regulatory networks between biological conditions to identify rewired gene-gene relationships.
DiffCorr uses Fisher's z-transform to test whether the correlation between two genes differs significantly between two conditions.
library(DiffCorr)
library(igraph)
# Separate expression matrices by condition (genes as columns, samples as rows)
expr_all <- read.csv('normalized_counts.csv', row.names = 1)
sample_info <- read.csv('sample_info.csv', row.names = 1)
expr_condition1 <- t(expr_all[, sample_info$condition == 'control'])
expr_condition2 <- t(expr_all[, sample_info$condition == 'disease'])
# Filter to variable genes (top 2000-5000 most variable)
gene_vars <- apply(expr_all, 1, var)
top_genes <- names(sort(gene_vars, decreasing = TRUE))[1:3000]
expr_condition1 <- expr_condition1[, top_genes]
expr_condition2 <- expr_condition2[, top_genes]
# Compute correlation matrices
cor1 <- cor(expr_condition1, method = 'pearson')
cor2 <- cor(expr_condition2, method = 'pearson')
n1 <- nrow(expr_condition1)
n2 <- nrow(expr_condition2)
# Fisher z-transform test for differential correlation
# Compares correlation coefficients between two groups
result <- comp.2.cc.fdr(
output.file = 'diffcorr_results.txt',
data1 = expr_condition1,
data2 = expr_condition2,
threshold = 0.05 # FDR threshold
)
diffcorr <- read.delim('diffcorr_results.txt')
# Classify differential correlations
classify_edge <- function(cor1, cor2, threshold = 0.3) {
if (abs(cor1) < threshold & abs(cor2) >= threshold) return('gained')
if (abs(cor1) >= threshold & abs(cor2) < threshold) return('lost')
if (cor1 > threshold & cor2 < -threshold) return('reversed')
if (cor1 < -threshold & cor2 > threshold) return('reversed')
return('unchanged')
}
diffcorr$edge_type <- mapply(classify_edge, diffcorr$cor1, diffcorr$cor2)
table(diffcorr$edge_type)
# Focus on significant rewired edges
significant <- diffcorr[diffcorr$p.adj < 0.05, ]
rewired <- significant[significant$edge_type != 'unchanged', ]
print(paste('Significant rewired edges:', nrow(rewired)))
# Genes involved in most differential correlations
gene_rewiring <- c(rewired$gene1, rewired$gene2)
rewiring_counts <- sort(table(gene_rewiring), decreasing = TRUE)
top_rewired_genes <- head(rewiring_counts, 20)
print(top_rewired_genes)
# These genes have the most condition-specific regulatory changes
DGCA (Differential Gene Correlation Analysis) was archived from CRAN in May 2024. It is still available via GitHub.
# Install from GitHub (archived from CRAN 2024-05)
devtools::install_github('andymckenzie/DGCA')
library(DGCA)
# Run differential correlation analysis
dgca_results <- ddcorAll(
inputMat = expr_all,
design = sample_info$condition,
compare = c('control', 'disease'),
adjust = 'BH', # multiple testing correction
nPerm = 0, # 0 for analytical p-values (faster)
corrType = 'pearson'
)
# Filter significant results
sig_dgca <- dgca_results[dgca_results$pValDiff_adj < 0.05, ]
# Classify by correlation change category
# DGCA provides: +/+, +/-, -/+, -/-, +/0, 0/+, -/0, 0/-, 0/0
table(sig_dgca$Classes)
Goal: Identify gene pairs whose co-expression relationship changes significantly between two conditions using a Python-native workflow.
Approach: Compute per-condition Pearson correlation matrices, test each gene pair for differential correlation using Fisher's z-transform, apply BH FDR correction, then classify edges as gained, lost, or reversed based on correlation magnitude thresholds.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
import networkx as nx
def build_correlation_network(expr_matrix, threshold=0.6):
'''Build network from correlation matrix, keeping edges above threshold.'''
cor_matrix = expr_matrix.corr(method='pearson')
genes = cor_matrix.columns.tolist()
G = nx.Graph()
G.add_nodes_from(genes)
for i in range(len(genes)):
for j in range(i + 1, len(genes)):
r = cor_matrix.iloc[i, j]
if abs(r) >= threshold:
G.add_edge(genes[i], genes[j], weight=r)
return G
def fisher_z_test(r1, n1, r2, n2):
'''Fisher z-transform test for difference between two correlations.'''
z1 = np.arctanh(np.clip(r1, -0.9999, 0.9999))
z2 = np.arctanh(np.clip(r2, -0.9999, 0.9999))
se = np.sqrt(1 / (n1 - 3) + 1 / (n2 - 3))
z_stat = (z1 - z2) / se
p_value = 2 * stats.norm.sf(abs(z_stat))
return z_stat, p_value
def differential_network_analysis(expr_cond1, expr_cond2, fdr_threshold=0.05):
'''Compare correlation networks between two conditions.'''
genes = expr_cond1.columns.tolist()
n1, n2 = len(expr_cond1), len(expr_cond2)
cor1 = expr_cond1.corr()
cor2 = expr_cond2.corr()
results = []
for i in range(len(genes)):
for j in range(i + 1, len(genes)):
r1, r2 = cor1.iloc[i, j], cor2.iloc[i, j]
z_stat, p_val = fisher_z_test(r1, n1, r2, n2)
results.append({
'gene1': genes[i], 'gene2': genes[j],
'cor_cond1': r1, 'cor_cond2': r2,
'z_stat': z_stat, 'p_value': p_val
})
df = pd.DataFrame(results)
# FDR correction
from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests
_, df['p_adj'], _, _ = multipletests(df['p_value'], method='fdr_bh')
# Classify edges
def classify(row, threshold=0.3):
r1, r2 = row['cor_cond1'], row['cor_cond2']
if abs(r1) < threshold and abs(r2) >= threshold:
return 'gained'
if abs(r1) >= threshold and abs(r2) < threshold:
return 'lost'
if r1 > threshold and r2 < -threshold:
return 'reversed'
if r1 < -threshold and r2 > threshold:
return 'reversed'
return 'unchanged'
df['edge_type'] = df.apply(classify, axis=1)
return df
# Usage
expr_all = pd.read_csv('normalized_counts.csv', index_col=0).T
sample_info = pd.read_csv('sample_info.csv', index_col=0)
expr_ctrl = expr_all.loc[sample_info[sample_info['condition'] == 'control'].index]
expr_disease = expr_all.loc[sample_info[sample_info['condition'] == 'disease'].index]
# Filter to top variable genes
gene_vars = expr_all.var()
top_genes = gene_vars.nlargest(3000).index.tolist()
expr_ctrl, expr_disease = expr_ctrl[top_genes], expr_disease[top_genes]
diff_results = differential_network_analysis(expr_ctrl, expr_disease)
significant = diff_results[diff_results['p_adj'] < 0.05]
print(significant['edge_type'].value_counts())
Goal: Render the rewired gene-gene connections as a color-coded network graph distinguishing gained, lost, and reversed edges.
Approach: Build a NetworkX graph from significant rewired edges, assign edge colors by change type, and draw with a spring layout.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
rewired = significant[significant['edge_type'] != 'unchanged']
G_diff = nx.Graph()
color_map = {'gained': '#2ca02c', 'lost': '#d62728', 'reversed': '#9467bd'}
for _, row in rewired.iterrows():
G_diff.add_edge(row['gene1'], row['gene2'],
color=color_map[row['edge_type']], weight=abs(row['z_stat']))
edge_colors = [G_diff[u][v]['color'] for u, v in G_diff.edges()]
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(12, 12))
pos = nx.spring_layout(G_diff, k=2, seed=42)
nx.draw_networkx(G_diff, pos, edge_color=edge_colors, node_size=50,
font_size=6, width=0.5, alpha=0.7, ax=ax)
# Legend
import matplotlib.patches as mpatches
legend_handles = [mpatches.Patch(color=c, label=l) for l, c in color_map.items()]
ax.legend(handles=legend_handles, loc='upper left')
ax.set_title('Differential co-expression network')
plt.savefig('differential_network.pdf', bbox_inches='tight')
| Consideration | Guideline | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum samples per group | 20 recommended, 15 floor | Correlation estimates unstable below 15 |
| Multiple testing | BH FDR correction | Thousands of gene pairs tested |
| Correlation method | Pearson (default) | Spearman for non-linear; Pearson is standard |
| Gene filtering | Top 2000-5000 variable | Reduces test burden, focuses on informative genes |
| Effect size filter | abs(delta_r) > 0.3 | Avoid reporting trivially different correlations |
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Workflow for read alignment, sorting, indexing, mapping statistics, and downstream-ready alignment artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AlphaFold2 / AlphaFold-Multimer structure prediction for validation and confidence scoring. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm2-sequence-scoring. For QC thresholds, use protein-design-qc.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Workflow for event-level and isoform-level splicing analysis with sashimi-ready outputs and splice QC.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ATAC-seq processing with assay QC, MACS3 peak calling, consensus peak matrices, differential accessibility, and motif or footprint follow-up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end binder design using BindCraft hallucination. Use this skill when: (1) Designing protein binders with built-in AF2 validation, (2) Running production-quality binder campaigns, (3) Using different design protocols (fast, default, slow), (4) Need joint backbone and sequence optimization, (5) Want high experimental success rate. For backbone-only generation, use rfdiffusion. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc. For tool selection guidance, use binder-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。