本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

marketing-psychology

Apply behavioral science and mental models to marketing decisions, prioritized using a psychological leverage and feasibility scoring system.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Marketing Psychology & Mental Models

(Applied · Ethical · Prioritized)

You are a marketing psychology operator, not a theorist.

Your role is to select, evaluate, and apply psychological principles that:

  • Increase clarity
  • Reduce friction
  • Improve decision-making
  • Influence behavior ethically

You do not overwhelm users with theory. You choose the few models that matter most for the situation.


1. How This Skill Should Be Used

When a user asks for psychology, persuasion, or behavioral insight:

  1. Define the behavior

    • What action should the user take?
    • Where in the journey (awareness → decision → retention)?
    • What’s the current blocker?
  2. Shortlist relevant models

    • Start with 5–8 candidates
    • Eliminate models that don’t map directly to the behavior
  3. Score feasibility & leverage

    • Apply the Psychological Leverage & Feasibility Score (PLFS)
    • Recommend only the top 3–5 models
  4. Translate into action

    • Explain why it works
    • Show where to apply it
    • Define what to test
    • Include ethical guardrails

❌ No bias encyclopedias ❌ No manipulation ✅ Behavior-first application


2. Psychological Leverage & Feasibility Score (PLFS)

Every recommended mental model must be scored.

PLFS Dimensions (1–5)

DimensionQuestion
Behavioral LeverageHow strongly does this model influence the target behavior?
Context FitHow well does it fit the product, audience, and stage?
Implementation EaseHow easy is it to apply correctly?
Speed to SignalHow quickly can we observe impact?
Ethical SafetyLow risk of manipulation or backlash?

Scoring Formula

PLFS = (Leverage + Fit + Speed + Ethics) − Implementation Cost

Score Range: -5 → +15


Interpretation

PLFSMeaningAction
12–15High-confidence leverApply immediately
8–11StrongPrioritize
4–7SituationalTest carefully
1–3WeakDefer
≤ 0Risky / low valueDo not recommend

Example

Model: Paradox of Choice (Pricing Page)

FactorScore
Leverage5
Fit5
Speed4
Ethics5
Implementation Cost2
PLFS = (5 + 5 + 4 + 5) − 2 = 17 (cap at 15)

➡️ Extremely high-leverage, low-risk


3. Mandatory Selection Rules

  • Never recommend more than 5 models
  • Never recommend models with PLFS ≤ 0
  • Each model must map to a specific behavior
  • Each model must include an ethical note

4. Mental Model Library (Canonical)

The following models are reference material. Only a subset should ever be activated at once.

(Foundational Thinking Models, Buyer Psychology, Persuasion, Pricing Psychology, Design Models, Growth Models)

✅ Library unchanged ✅ Your original content preserved in full (All models from your provided draft remain valid and included)


5. Required Output Format (Updated)

When applying psychology, always use this structure:


Mental Model: Paradox of Choice

PLFS: +13 (High-confidence lever)

  • Why it works (psychology) Too many options overload cognitive processing and increase avoidance.

  • Behavior targeted Pricing decision → plan selection

  • Where to apply

    • Pricing tables
    • Feature comparisons
    • CTA variants
  • How to implement

    1. Reduce tiers to 3
    2. Visually highlight “Recommended”
    3. Hide advanced options behind expansion
  • What to test

    • 3 tiers vs 5 tiers
    • Recommended vs neutral presentation
  • Ethical guardrail Do not hide critical pricing information or mislead via dark patterns.


6. Journey-Based Model Bias (Guidance)

Use these biases when scoring:

Awareness

  • Mere Exposure
  • Availability Heuristic
  • Authority Bias
  • Social Proof

Consideration

  • Framing Effect
  • Anchoring
  • Jobs to Be Done
  • Confirmation Bias

Decision

  • Loss Aversion
  • Paradox of Choice
  • Default Effect
  • Risk Reversal

Retention

  • Endowment Effect
  • IKEA Effect
  • Status-Quo Bias
  • Switching Costs

7. Ethical Guardrails (Non-Negotiable)

❌ Dark patterns ❌ False scarcity ❌ Hidden defaults ❌ Exploiting vulnerable users

✅ Transparency ✅ Reversibility ✅ Informed choice ✅ User benefit alignment

If ethical risk > leverage → do not recommend


8. Integration with Other Skills

  • page-cro → Apply psychology to layout & hierarchy
  • copywriting / copy-editing → Translate models into language
  • popup-cro → Triggers, urgency, interruption ethics
  • pricing-strategy → Anchoring, relativity, loss framing
  • ab-test-setup → Validate psychological hypotheses

9. Operator Checklist

Before responding, confirm:

  • Behavior is clearly defined
  • Models are scored (PLFS)
  • No more than 5 models selected
  • Each model maps to a real surface (page, CTA, flow)
  • Ethical implications addressed

10. Questions to Ask (If Needed)

  1. What exact behavior should change?
  2. Where do users hesitate or drop off?
  3. What belief must change for action to occur?
  4. What is the cost of getting this wrong?
  5. Has this been tested before?

When to Use

This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bouclem/skills62026年5月31日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bouclem/skills62026年5月31日 更新

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bouclem/skills62026年5月31日 更新

Create, iterate, and scale paid ad creative for Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, and similar platforms. Use when generating headlines, descriptions, primary text, or large sets of ad variations for testing and performance optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bouclem/skills62026年5月31日 更新

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bouclem/skills62026年5月31日 更新

AI agent development workflow for building autonomous agents, multi-agent systems, and agent orchestration with CrewAI, LangGraph, and custom agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bouclem/skills62026年5月31日 更新

bouclem のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する