本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

fec-component-testing

Use when authoring or reviewing frontend unit, component, or light integration tests close to UI code, including React Testing Library, Vue Test Utils, hooks/composables, props/emits, callbacks, accessible queries, user-event interactions, mocks, loading/error/empty states, and regression coverage. For layer planning, real-browser journeys, or existing validation failures, choose the matching testing or validation workflow first; Chinese triggers include component testing, Component unit testing, unit testing, lightweight integration testing.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

#Component testing

Purpose

Use tests close to the code and user behavior to verify pure logic, component contracts, and lightweight module collaboration to reduce refactoring and UI interaction regression.

Procedure

1. First determine the test level

  • Unit testing: pure functions, hooks/composables, utils, state logic, schema.
  • Component testing: props/emis, callbacks, user interaction, loading/error/empty, mock boundaries.
  • Lightweight integration testing: form + API mock + Router/Store/Provider context.

The cross-page real browser process is offloaded to the E2E workflow; if the test layer selection is unclear, do the test layering planning first.

2. Prioritize testing based on user-perceivable behavior

Each test keeps Arrange / Act / Assert clearly segmented: preparing data and rendering, performing user actions, asserting user-visible results or exposing contracts.

import { render, screen } from "@testing-library/react";
import userEvent from "@testing-library/user-event";
import { SearchBox } from "./SearchBox";

test("submits the entered keyword", async () => {
  const user = userEvent.setup();
  const onSearch = vi.fn();

  render(<SearchBox onSearch={onSearch} />);

  await user.type(screen.getByRole("searchbox", { name: /keyword/i }), "orders");
  await user.click(screen.getByRole("button", { name: /search/i }));

  expect(onSearch).toHaveBeenCalledWith("orders");
});

3. Vue components use accessible queries or explicit text assertions

import { mount } from "@vue/test-utils";
import UserMenu from "./UserMenu.vue";

test("emits logout when the logout item is clicked", async () => {
  const wrapper = mount(UserMenu, {
    props: { userName: "Ada" },
  });

  await wrapper.get('[data-testid="logout-button"]').trigger("click");

  expect(wrapper.emitted("logout")).toHaveLength(1);
});

Prefer roles, labels, and visible text; only use data-testid when there is no stable semantics.

4. Control mock boundaries

vi.mock("../api/users", () => ({
  fetchUsers: vi.fn(async () => [{ id: "1", name: "Ada" }]),
}));
  • Mock network, time, routing and browser APIs.
  • Do not mock the internal functions of the component under test.
  • Only make light mocks of the basic components of the design system to retain accessible behaviors.
  • Mock data should express the business scenario and not use arbitrary strings that only the test author can understand.
  • Shared fixtures should remain readable, and complex objects should use builders to fill in default values; each test only covers the fields relevant to the scenario.
  • When mocking the network, give priority to simulating user-visible results and error shapes, and do not copy back-end implementation details.

5. Override key status

Each complex component covers at least:

  • Default rendering.
  • User interaction and callbacks.
  • loading / empty / error。
  • Permission or disabled status.
  • Keyboard interaction and focus behavior (when applicable).

6. Keep tests maintainable

function setup() {
  const user = userEvent.setup();
  const onSubmit = vi.fn();
  render(<ProfileForm onSubmit={onSubmit} />);
  return { user, onSubmit };
}

Put the repetitive rendering logic into setup, but don't hide the core actions and assertions of the test.

7. Regression testing proves the problem first

  • Bug fixes should be written first to create the smallest test that can reproduce the failure.
  • Reasons for failure should point to user behavior or public contracts, not import errors, test environments, or wait methods.
  • Keep regression testing after fixing to avoid leaving verification only in manual steps.

Constraints

  • Avoid testing implementation details such as internal state names, private function calls, DOM hierarchy snapshots.
  • Do not use snapshot as the main assertion for interactive components; it can only assist in checking stable static output.
  • Use findBy* or waitFor for asynchronous assertions, do not use fixed delays.
  • Test names should describe user scenarios, not function names.
  • Component testing is not a replacement for E2E; routing, real-browser compatibility, and cross-page flows still require E2E.
  • Do not copy component implementation logic in tests; otherwise the test will pass with the wrong implementation.
  • No mutable fixtures, global store or fake timer state shared between tests; each use case has independent setup and cleanup.

Expected Output

Produce test files in the same directory as the component or in the directory agreed upon by the project, covering core interactions, status and regression scenarios. During verification, run the existing test command of the project to confirm that the failure information can be located to user behavior or component contract.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

用于审查或改进前端无障碍、语义结构、键盘支持、焦点管理、ARIA 标签、屏幕阅读器行为、WCAG 2.2 问题、触控无障碍或辅助技术回归;中文触发词包括 无障碍、accessibility、a11y、WCAG、屏幕阅读器。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bovinphang/frontend-craft222026年9月26日 更新

Use when reviewing or improving frontend accessibility, semantic structure, keyboard support, focus management, ARIA labels, screen reader behavior, WCAG 2.2 issues, touch accessibility, or assistive-technology regressions; Chinese triggers include accessibility, accessibility, a11y, WCAG, screen reader.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bovinphang/frontend-craft222026年9月26日 更新

用于从参考系统中吸收想法、能力、工作流、架构、质量体系、生态扩展或工程实践,并通过原创的项目内重设计转化为当前项目能力,而不是复制原实现。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bovinphang/frontend-craft222026年9月26日 更新

Use when absorbing ideas, capabilities, workflows, architecture, quality systems, ecosystem extensions, or engineering practices from any reference system into the current project through original, project-native redesign rather than copying.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bovinphang/frontend-craft222026年9月26日 更新

Use when designing, implementing, or reviewing frontend-to-backend API integration, typed API clients, REST/tRPC/OpenAPI client choices, auth refresh, API error mapping, upload flows, SSE/WebSocket/polling choices, CORS-facing frontend behavior, or cross-boundary loading/error states. Do not use for backend-only service architecture or TanStack Query cache policy alone; Chinese triggers include API integration, front-end and back-end joint debugging, typed API client, Interface error handling, SSE, WebSocket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bovinphang/frontend-craft222026年9月26日 更新

用于设计、实现或审查前后端 API 集成、类型化 API client、REST/tRPC/OpenAPI 客户端选型、认证刷新、API 错误映射、上传流程、SSE/WebSocket/轮询选择、CORS 相关前端行为或跨边界 loading/error 状态。不要用于纯后端服务架构或仅 TanStack Query 缓存策略;中文触发词包括 API 集成、前后端联调、typed API client、接口错误处理、SSE、WebSocket。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bovinphang/frontend-craft222026年9月26日 更新

bovinphang のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する