本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

container-audit

Audit container images, Dockerfiles, and Kubernetes manifests for misconfigurations, excessive privileges, exposed secrets, and runtime risks. Use when the user mentions 'container security,' 'Docker security,' 'Dockerfile audit,' 'Kubernetes security,' 'K8s security,' 'pod security,' 'container hardening,' 'kubectl audit,' 'image scanning,' 'distroless,' 'rootless containers,' 'pod security policy,' 'pod security standards,' 'PSS,' 'network policy,' 'OPA Gatekeeper,' 'Kyverno,' 'runtime security,' or needs to review container or orchestration security.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md9.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Container Audit — Docker & Kubernetes Security Review

Audit container images, Dockerfiles, Helm charts, Kustomize overlays, and Kubernetes manifests for misconfiguration, excessive privilege, exposed secrets, and runtime security gaps. Distinct from cloud-audit (cloud-provider IAM and managed services) and dependency-audit (package CVEs in the application). This skill is the container/orchestration layer between them.

Scope the Audit

  1. Inventory the surface — Dockerfiles, base images, registries, Helm charts, K8s manifests, Kustomize overlays, CI build pipelines that produce images
  2. Identify the runtime — vanilla K8s, EKS, GKE, AKS, OpenShift, ECS Fargate, Cloud Run, Fly.io
  3. Identify the network model — service mesh, ingress controller, default-deny vs default-allow
  4. Identify the secret model — K8s Secrets (base64-only), External Secrets Operator, sealed-secrets, Vault, Doppler

Audit Checklist — Dockerfile

Base image & supply chain

  • Pinned by digest, not tag — FROM node:20@sha256:abc... not FROM node:20 (which can move)
  • Distroless / minimal where possible — gcr.io/distroless/nodejs20, alpine (be aware of musl quirks), chainguard/*
  • Not using :latest — non-reproducible builds
  • Multi-stage builds discard build-time tooling — FROM build AS builder → FROM runtime final stage
  • Grep for: FROM .*:latest, FROM .*:[0-9]+$ (tag without digest)

Build-time exposure

  • Secrets passed via --build-arg end up in image layers visible to anyone who pulls the image — use BuildKit secrets (--mount=type=secret) or runtime env vars instead
  • COPY . . ships everything in the build context — .dockerignore should exclude .git, .env, node_modules, *.pem, .aws/, .ssh/
  • ADD <url> follows redirects and disables checksum verification — prefer RUN curl ... && sha256sum -c
  • Grep for: ARG .*KEY, ARG .*TOKEN, ARG .*SECRET, ENV .*=.*[A-Za-z0-9]{32,}, ADD http

Runtime posture

  • Non-root user — USER 1001 (or any non-zero UID) before CMD
  • No chmod 4755 SUID binaries in the final image
  • No unnecessary shells / package managers in the final stage — distroless / FROM scratch is the strong default
  • HEALTHCHECK defined so orchestrator can detect unhealthy containers
  • Read-only root filesystem at runtime (set via K8s; verify nothing in the image writes outside /tmp or a declared volume)
  • Grep for: USER root (or absence of any USER directive), chmod 4755, apt-get install.*sudo

Audit Checklist — Kubernetes manifests

Pod security

  • securityContext.runAsNonRoot: true and runAsUser set to a non-zero UID
  • securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
  • securityContext.readOnlyRootFilesystem: true with explicit emptyDir mounts where the app needs to write
  • securityContext.capabilities.drop: ["ALL"] then add only what's needed
  • securityContext.privileged is never true in app workloads (Falco, kube-proxy, some CSI drivers are the rare legit exceptions)
  • hostNetwork, hostPID, hostIPC all false — yes on these is "container can see / talk to the node"
  • hostPath volumes — every one is a node-escape risk; review case by case
  • Grep for: privileged: true, runAsUser: 0, hostNetwork: true, hostPath:

Pod Security Standards (PSS) / admission

  • Cluster enforces restricted profile via PSS admission, or equivalent via OPA Gatekeeper / Kyverno
  • Pod Security Policies (deprecated since 1.21, removed in 1.25) are NOT what's enforcing this — confirm a current admission controller
  • No workloads in the kube-system namespace running app code

Network

  • NetworkPolicy exists for every namespace running app workloads — default-deny ingress AND egress, then allow specific pods
  • Missing NetworkPolicy = every pod can talk to every other pod on every port, including kube-apiserver and metadata service
  • Service mesh (Istio, Linkerd) mTLS in STRICT mode for sensitive namespaces, not PERMISSIVE
  • Ingress controllers terminate TLS properly; backend tls.crt / tls.key in K8s Secrets rotate

Secrets

  • K8s Secrets are base64-encoded, NOT encrypted — by default they're plain bytes in etcd
  • etcd encryption at rest enabled — --encryption-provider-config on kube-apiserver
  • Workloads consume secrets via projected volumes, not environment variables (env vars leak via /proc/<pid>/environ, error reports, crash dumps)
  • External Secrets Operator / Vault / sealed-secrets bridge so the Git repo never contains plaintext
  • Grep for: kind: Secret in Git with data: fields (base64-encoded values committed)

RBAC

  • No ClusterRole with * verbs on * resources except cluster-admin (audit who's bound to it)
  • ServiceAccount per workload, not shared "default" SA
  • automountServiceAccountToken: false on workloads that don't need API access
  • Bindings of system:authenticated group are visible to every legitimate workload — almost always wrong
  • Grep for: verbs: ["*"], resources: ["*"], apiGroups: ["*"], system:authenticated

Resource limits

  • Every container has resources.requests and resources.limits set — missing limits = noisy neighbor + DoS surface (one pod can starve the node)
  • LimitRange per namespace as a backstop
  • ResourceQuota per namespace prevents tenant-vs-tenant resource exhaustion

Image policy

  • imagePullPolicy: Always for :latest (you shouldn't use :latest, but if you do) — otherwise the node caches stale images
  • Cluster-level policy that all images come from approved registries (your own + a small allow-list); enforced via Gatekeeper / Kyverno / image-policy-webhook
  • Image signature verification — cosign + sigstore policy controller, or Notary v2

Audit Checklist — runtime

  • Image scanning in CI — trivy image, grype, docker scout cves. Must run on every build; advisories should not block but should surface
  • Runtime detection — Falco / Tracee / Tetragon catches "shell spawned in a pod that has never opened a shell" patterns
  • Audit logs enabled — kube-apiserver audit log captures exec, attach, port-forward events for incident response
  • kubectl exec access tracked — not free for any cluster-admin to silently shell into prod

Useful one-liners

# All Dockerfiles in the repo + their first FROM line
git ls-files | grep -E '(^|/)Dockerfile(\.|$)' | xargs -I{} sh -c 'echo "==> {}"; grep ^FROM "{}"'

# Manifests missing securityContext
grep -rL "securityContext" --include="*.yaml" --include="*.yml" .

# Manifests with privileged containers
grep -rln "privileged: *true" --include="*.yaml" --include="*.yml" .

# Manifests with hostPath volumes
grep -rln "hostPath:" --include="*.yaml" --include="*.yml" .

# Secrets in Git (base64-encoded but readable)
grep -rln "kind: *Secret" --include="*.yaml" --include="*.yml" . | xargs grep -l "^data:"

# Image scan (Trivy)
trivy image --severity HIGH,CRITICAL --exit-code 0 <image>

# Manifest scan (Trivy)
trivy config --severity HIGH,CRITICAL .

# Cluster posture (kube-bench, run inside the cluster)
kube-bench run --targets master,node,policies

Verify Fixes at Runtime

  • runAsNonRoot: true — verify the pod restarts cleanly and stays Running; if the image's ENTRYPOINT calls chown it'll crashloop
  • NetworkPolicy default-deny — verify legitimate traffic still works (run an in-cluster kubectl run -it --rm debug ... curl); silent partial outages are common after default-deny rollout
  • readOnlyRootFilesystem: true — verify the app doesn't write outside declared emptyDir mounts; log writes, PID files, and tmp files are common breakers
  • Image-policy enforcement — try to deploy an unsigned / off-list image; verify admission rejects it

Report Format

# Container Security Audit
## Target: [cluster name / image registry / repo path]
## Date: [date]

### Summary
- Dockerfiles audited: N
- Manifests audited: N
- Cluster posture checks: pass / fail counts

### Findings
| ID | Severity | Category | Location | Issue |
|----|----------|----------|----------|-------|

### Per-finding detail
#### [SEVERITY] [Title]
**File:** `path/to/manifest.yaml:42`
**Category:** Dockerfile | Pod security | RBAC | NetworkPolicy | Secrets | Resource limits | Image policy | Runtime

**Description:** [what the issue is]

**Vulnerable config:**
```yaml
[snippet]

Remediation:

[fixed snippet]

Verification: [observed behavior proving the fix holds]


Disposition rule (Fixed / Deferred / Accepted Risk) matches `owasp-audit`.

## Boundaries

- Only audit clusters and registries the user provides or has authorization for
- Never `kubectl delete` or modify cluster state during an audit — read-only operations only (`get`, `describe`, `auth can-i`)
- For runtime evidence, prefer non-disruptive checks (a `kubectl run -it --rm` ephemeral debug pod) over modifying running workloads
- Refuse cluster-takeover scenarios — escalating from a found weakness to a full pivot is exploitation, not audit
- Flag low-confidence findings as "Potential" rather than confirmed

## References

- CIS Docker Benchmark
- CIS Kubernetes Benchmark
- NSA/CISA Kubernetes Hardening Guide
- Pod Security Standards (PSS) — restricted, baseline, privileged
- OWASP Docker Security Cheat Sheet
- OWASP Kubernetes Security Cheat Sheet
- MITRE ATT&CK for Containers

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the security slice). Use when the user mentions 'AI risk,' 'AI governance,' 'NIST AI RMF,' 'AI compliance,' 'ML governance,' 'model risk management,' 'AI fairness,' 'AI bias,' 'algorithmic accountability,' 'AI Bill of Rights,' 'EU AI Act,' 'AI transparency,' 'model card,' 'AI red team,' 'AI safety,' 'responsible AI,' 'model drift,' 'concept drift,' 'AI monitoring,' 'AI incident,' or needs to assess or govern an AI / ML system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4192026年5月27日 更新

api-audit

無料

Audit REST, GraphQL, and RPC APIs against the OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023). Use when the user mentions 'API security,' 'API audit,' 'BOLA,' 'broken object level authorization,' 'BFLA,' 'function-level authorization,' 'mass assignment,' 'API rate limiting,' 'GraphQL security,' 'REST security,' 'API authentication,' 'API authorization,' 'excessive data exposure,' or needs to review API endpoints for security weaknesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4192026年5月27日 更新

Learn from public breach disclosures — extract the audit question each one implies and check your own stack. Capital One IMDS abuse, LastPass vault exfiltration, Okta Lapsus$, Snowflake credential reuse, MOVEit, SolarWinds, Equifax, Target POS, Codecov, Uber, Twilio — what would you check now if your boss said 'could that happen to us?' Use when the user mentions 'breach analysis,' 'lessons learned,' 'security postmortem,' 'breach patterns,' 'breach lessons,' 'has this happened to us,' 'apply breach lessons,' 'preempt breaches,' 'security retrospective,' 'real-world security incidents,' or wants to harden against known attacker playbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4192026年5月27日 更新

Audit cloud infrastructure (AWS, GCP, Azure) for misconfigurations, excessive permissions, and security gaps. Use when the user mentions 'cloud security,' 'cloud audit,' 'AWS security,' 'GCP security,' 'Azure security,' 'IAM audit,' 'S3 bucket,' 'cloud misconfiguration,' 'cloud hardening,' or needs to review cloud infrastructure security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4192026年5月27日 更新

Audit cryptography implementation — algorithm choice, key sizes, KDF parameters, IV/nonce handling, signature verification, randomness, TLS configuration, and key rotation. Deeper than owasp-audit A02. Use when the user mentions 'crypto review,' 'cryptography audit,' 'encryption review,' 'KDF,' 'PBKDF2,' 'Argon2,' 'bcrypt cost,' 'IV reuse,' 'nonce reuse,' 'AES mode,' 'AES-GCM,' 'AES-ECB,' 'signature verification,' 'TLS configuration,' 'cipher suites,' 'key rotation,' 'libsodium,' 'BoringSSL,' or 'is this crypto right.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4192026年5月27日 更新

Map your security posture against the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover). Produce a gap analysis, current/target tier assessment, and roadmap in the governance language that boards, auditors, and CISOs actually use. Use when the user mentions 'NIST CSF,' 'CSF 2.0,' 'cybersecurity framework,' 'security posture,' 'governance mapping,' 'CSF gap analysis,' 'CSF tiers,' 'cybersecurity maturity,' 'security roadmap,' 'CISO report,' 'board reporting,' 'security program,' or needs to translate technical findings into governance language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills4192026年5月27日 更新

briiirussell のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する